Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.


ABSTRACT: We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10-7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation.

SUBMITTER: Creager HM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7336953 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Creager Hannah M HM   Cabrera Barbara B   Schnaubelt Andy A   Cox Jesse L JL   Cushman-Vokoun Allison M AM   Shakir Salika M SM   Tardif Keith D KD   Huang Meei-Li ML   Jerome Keith R KR   Greninger Alexander L AL   Drobysheva Daria D   Spaulding Usha U   Rogatcheva Margarita M   Bourzac Kevin M KM   Hinrichs S H SH   Broadhurst M J MJ   Fey P D PD  

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology 20200706


We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10553804 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7654322 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8942994 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8064816 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8482523 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9377931 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8775103 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8197784 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9983612 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7924818 | biostudies-literature