Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Hydroxychloroquine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: whole blood is preferable but serum levels also detect non-adherence.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) levels can be measured in both serum and whole blood. No cut-off point for non-adherence has been established in serum nor have these methods ever been compared. The aims of this study were to compare these two approaches and determine if serum HCQ cut-off points can be established to identify non-adherent patients.

Methods

HCQ levels were measured in serum and whole blood from 573 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The risk factors for active SLE (SLEDAI score > 4) were identified by multiple logistic regression. Serum HCQ levels were measured in 68 additional patients known to be non-adherent, i.e. with whole-blood HCQ < 200 ng/mL.

Results

The mean (± SD) HCQ levels were 469 ± 223 ng/mL in serum and 916 ± 449 ng/mL in whole blood. The mean ratio of serum/whole-blood HCQ levels was 0.53 ± 0.15. In the multivariate analysis, low whole-blood HCQ levels (P = 0.023), but not serum HCQ levels, were independently associated with active SLE. From the mean serum/whole-blood level ratio, a serum HCQ level of 106 ng/mL was extrapolated as the corresponding cut-off to identify non-adherent patients with a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) and specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.72-0.98). All serum HCQ levels of patients with whole-blood HCQ below the detectable level (< 20 ng/mL) were also undetectable (< 20 ng/mL).

Conclusions

These data suggest that whole blood is better than serum for assessing the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relation of HCQ. Our results support the use of serum HCQ levels to assess non-adherence when whole blood is unavailable.

SUBMITTER: Blanchet B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7517694 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Hydroxychloroquine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: whole blood is preferable but serum levels also detect non-adherence.

Blanchet Benoit B   Jallouli Moez M   Allard Marie M   Ghillani-Dalbin Pascale P   Galicier Lionel L   Aumaître Olivier O   Chasset François F   Le Guern Véronique V   Lioté Frédéric F   Smail Amar A   Limal Nicolas N   Perard Laurent L   Desmurs-Clavel Hélène H   Le Thi Huong Du D   Asli Bouchra B   Kahn Jean-Emmanuel JE   Sailler Laurent L   Ackermann Félix F   Papo Thomas T   Sacré Karim K   Fain Olivier O   Stirnemann Jérôme J   Cacoub Patrice P   Leroux Gaelle G   Cohen-Bittan Judith J   Sellam Jérémie J   Mariette Xavier X   Goulvestre Claire C   Hulot Jean Sébastien JS   Amoura Zahir Z   Vidal Michel M   Piette Jean-Charles JC   Jourde-Chiche Noémie N   Costedoat-Chalumeau Nathalie N  

Arthritis research & therapy 20200925 1


<h4>Background</h4>Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) levels can be measured in both serum and whole blood. No cut-off point for non-adherence has been established in serum nor have these methods ever been compared. The aims of this study were to compare these two approaches and determine if serum HCQ cut-off points can be established to identify non-adherent patients.<h4>Methods</h4>HCQ levels were measured in serum and whole blood from 573 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The risk facto  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11879311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8848057 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10654291 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11364994 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9724699 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10787061 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7794606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9855909 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5835241 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7490265 | biostudies-literature