Dataset Information

Advantages of additional PET vs. MRI in the clinical diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors.

ABSTRACT: The present study retrospectively examined the diagnostic utility of adding positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to computed tomography (CT) alone for preoperative diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors. A total of 104 consecutive patients who had undergone surgical resection of anterior mediastinal tumors were divided into two groups: Additional PET to another modality and no additional PET to another modality, and further subdivided into three groups: CT alone, additional MRI to CT and additional PET to CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing malignant tumors in each subgroup was calculated. Comparing the two groups, the diagnostic sensitivity was similar for additional PET (98.0%) and no additional PET (95.2%) groups; however, the specificity and accuracy for additional PET (75.0 and 92.2%, respectively) were significantly improved compared with no additional PET (31.6 and 65.0%, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, adding PET to CT showed an improvement in specificity and positive predictive value for detecting malignant tumors, compared with either additional MRI to CT or CT alone. Additional PET, but not MRI, has advantages over CT alone in clinically distinguishing benign from malignant tumors of the mediastinum.

SUBMITTER: Yajima T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7642802 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Advantages of additional PET vs. MRI in the clinical diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors.

Yajima Toshiki T Mogi Akira A Yamaki Ei E Onozato Ryouichi R Kosaka Takayuki T Shirabe Ken K Kuwano Hiroyuki H

Molecular and clinical oncology 20201016 6

The present study retrospectively examined the diagnostic utility of adding positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to computed tomography (CT) alone for preoperative diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors. A total of 104 consecutive patients who had undergone surgical resection of anterior mediastinal tumors were divided into two groups: Additional PET to another modality and no additional PET to another modality, and further subdivided into three groups: CT alo ...[more]

PMID: 33163181

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of the subxiphoid approach for early anterior mediastinal thymoma and evaluate its advantages over the lateral intercostal approach.MethodsA total of 345 patients with early anterior mediastinal thymoma were retrospectively analyzed from January 2016 to December 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Out of these, 99 patients underwent subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy and 246 patients underwent transthoracic video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. We compared the intraoperative conditions (such as operation time and intraoperative blood loss), postoperative conditions [such as postoperative pleural drainage volume, extubation time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score], and postoperative complications (such as death, pneumonia, delayed wound healing, cardiac arrhythmia, and phrenic nerve injury) of the two groups and analyzed the clinical advantages of the subxiphoid approach for treating early anterior mediastinal thymoma.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general clinical features, operation time, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05).However, there was a significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pleural drainage volume, tube extubation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative VAS pain score, and postoperative analgesics (a significantly decreased flurbiprofen axetil amount) (P < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with the lateral intercostal thoracic approach, the subxiphoid approach had advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, tube extubation time, postoperative pleural drainage volume, postoperative VAS pain score, and analgesics dosage. It could provide a better view of the bilateral pleural cavities and more thorough thymectomy and superior cosmesis, and it proved to be a safe and feasible minimally invasive surgical method.

Project description:UnlabelledWe assessed the value of fusion (18)F-fluoromethylcholine ((18)F-choline) PET/MRI for image-guided (targeted) prostate biopsies to detect significant prostate cancer (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) compared with standard (systematic 12-core) biopsies.MethodsWithin an ongoing prospective clinical trial, hybrid (18)F-choline PET/CT and multiparametric 3T MRI (mpMRI) of the pelvis were performed in 36 subjects with a rising prostate-specific antigen for known (n = 15) or suspected (n = 21) prostate cancer before a prostate biopsy procedure. PET and T2-weighted MR volumes of the prostate were spatially registered using commercially available software. Biopsy targets were selected on the basis of visual appearance on MRI and graded as low, intermediate, or high risk for significant disease. Volumes of interest were defined for MR-identified lesions. (18)F-choline uptake measures were obtained from the MR target and a mirrored background volume of interest. The biopsy procedure was performed after registration of real-time transrectal ultrasound with T2-weighted MR and included image-guided cores plus standard cores. Histologic results were determined from standard and targeted biopsy cores as well as prostatectomy specimens (n = 10).ResultsFifteen subjects were ultimately identified with Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 prostate cancer, of which targeted biopsy identified significantly more (n = 12) than standard biopsies (n = 5; P = 0.002). A total of 52 lesions were identified by mpMRI (19 low, 18 intermediate, 15 high risk), and mpMRI-assigned risk was a strong predictor of final pathology (area under the curve = 0.81; P < 0.001). When the mean (18)F-choline target-to-background ratio was used, the addition of (18)F-choline to mpMRI significantly improved the prediction of Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 cancers over mpMRI alone (area under the curve = 0.92; P < 0.001).ConclusionFusion PET/MRI transrectal ultrasound image registration for targeted prostate biopsies is clinically feasible and accurate. The addition of (18)F-choline PET to mpMRI improves the identification of significant prostate cancer.

Project description:This study aimed to evaluate the role of pretreatment SUVmax and volumetric FDG positron emission tomography (PET) parameters in the differentiation between benign and malignant mediastinal tumors. In addition, we investigated whether pretreatment SUVmax and volumetric FDG-PET parameters could distinguish thymomas from thymic carcinomas, and low-risk from high-risk thymomas.This study was conducted on 52 patients with mediastinal tumors undergoing FDG-PET/CT. Histological examination indicated that 29 mediastinal tumors were benign, and 23 cases were malignant. To obtain quantitative PET/CT parameters, we determined the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), volumetric parameters, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for primary tumors using SUVmax cut-off value of 2.5. SUVmax, MTV and TLG of benign and malignant tumors were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Moreover, receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis was applied to identify the cut-off values of SUVmax, MTV and TLG for the accurate differentiation of benign and malignant tumors. SUVmax, MTV and TLG were compared between thymomas and thymic carcinomas, as well as low-risk and high-risk thymomas.Mean SUVmax, MTV and TLG of malignant mediastinal tumors were significantly higher compared to benign tumors (P<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SUVmax were 78.2%, 86.2%, 82.6%, 81.8%, and 83.3%, respectively. These values were estimated at 82.6%, 96.6%, 90.4%, 95%, and 87.5% for MTV and TLG, respectively. Additionally, optimal cut-off values for the differentiation of benign and malignant mediastinal tumors were determined at 4.2 and 22.3 mL and 79.7 g for SUVmax, MTV and TLG, respectively. Mean SUVmax, MTV and TLG of thymic carcinomas were significantly higher compared to thymomas (P<0.01), while no significant differences were observed in the mean quantitative parameters between low-risk and high-risk thymomas.Although SUVmax, MTV and TLG could not distinguish between low-risk and high-risk thymomas, these parameters might be able to differentiate benign tumors from malignant mediastinal tumors noninvasively. These parameters could be used to distinguish between thymomas and thymic carcinomas as well. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT parameters seem to be accurate indices for the detection of malignant mediastinal tumors.

Project description:BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has been used to treat anterior mediastinal tumors. This study sought to describe a single team's experience of uniport subxiphoid mediastinal surgery using a modified sternum retractor.MethodsPatients who underwent uniport subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (USVATS) or unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (LVATS) from September 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. A 5-cm vertical incision approximately 1-cm caudal to the xiphoid process was usually made followed by the installment of a modified retractor, which was able to raise the sternum by 6-8 cm. Next, the USVATS was performed. In the unilateral group, 3 1-cm incisions were usually made, among which, 2 are made in the 2nd or 3rd and 5th intercostal anterior axillary line, and the 3rd was made in the 5th intercostal midclavicular line. In some instances, an additional subxiphoid incision was made to remove the large tumors. All the clinical and perioperative data, including the prospectively recorded visual analogue scale (VAS) score, were analyzed.ResultsIn total, 16 patients who underwent USVATS and 28 patients who underwent LVATS were enrolled in this study. With the exception of tumor size (USVATS 7.9±1.6 cm vs. LVATS 5.1±2.4 cm, P<0.001), the baseline data of the patients in the 2 groups were comparative. Blood loss in surgery, conversion, draining duration, postoperative stay, postoperative complications, pathology and tumor invasion were similar between the 2 groups. Although the operation time was significantly longer in the USVATS group than the LVATS group (115±19 vs. 83±30 min, P<0.001), the VAS score at 1st postoperative day (1.9±1.1 vs. 3.1±1.1, P<0.001) and moderate pain level (a VAS score >3) (6.3% vs. 32.1%, P=0.049) were better in the USVATS group than the LVATS group.ConclusionsUniport subxiphoid mediastinal surgery is a feasible and safe procedure, especially for large tumors. Our modified sternum retractor is especially helpful during uniport subxiphoid surgery. Compared to lateral thoracic surgery, this approach has the advantages of less injury and lower postoperative pain, which may lead to a faster recovery. However, its long-term follow-up outcomes need to be observed.

Dataset Information

Advantages of additional PET vs. MRI in the clinical diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors.

Publications

Advantages of additional PET vs. MRI in the clinical diagnosis of anterior mediastinal tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets