Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content.


ABSTRACT: People tend to interpret political information in a manner that confirms their prior beliefs, a cognitive bias that contributes to rising political polarization. In this study, we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging with semantic content analyses to investigate the neural mechanisms that underlie the biased processing of real-world political content. We scanned American participants with conservative-leaning or liberal-leaning immigration attitudes while they watched news clips, campaign ads, and public speeches related to immigration policy. We searched for evidence of "neural polarization": activity in the brain that diverges between people who hold liberal versus conservative political attitudes. Neural polarization was observed in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), a brain region associated with the interpretation of narrative content. Neural polarization in the DMPFC intensified during moments in the videos that included risk-related and moral-emotional language, highlighting content features most likely to drive divergent interpretations between conservatives and liberals. Finally, participants whose DMPFC activity closely matched that of the average conservative or the average liberal participant were more likely to change their attitudes in the direction of that group's position. Our work introduces a multimethod approach to study the neural basis of political cognition in naturalistic settings. Using this approach, we characterize how political attitudes biased information processing in the brain, the language most likely to drive polarized neural responses, and the consequences of biased processing for attitude change. Together, these results shed light on the psychological and neural underpinnings of how identical information is interpreted differently by conservatives and liberals.

SUBMITTER: Leong YC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7959490 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content.

Leong Yuan Chang YC   Chen Janice J   Willer Robb R   Zaki Jamil J  

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20201020 44


People tend to interpret political information in a manner that confirms their prior beliefs, a cognitive bias that contributes to rising political polarization. In this study, we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging with semantic content analyses to investigate the neural mechanisms that underlie the biased processing of real-world political content. We scanned American participants with conservative-leaning or liberal-leaning immigration attitudes while they watched news clips, campa  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3867439 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6681971 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8204937 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6060547 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9891706 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9999339 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11377512 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8017675 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9340134 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8455561 | biostudies-literature