Dataset Information

Family history and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction and hypothesis

Numerous analytic observational studies assess family history as a risk factor for POP and report a wide range of associations. This review aims to systematically evaluate the role of family history of POP in relation to POP risk and its recurrence.

Methods

A review was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE database with search criteria specifying family history, risk factors, POP, and their synonyms as title/abstract keywords, as well as MESH terms, up to March 2020. We aggregated evidence across studies with fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) meta-analysis.

Results

Forty-three articles underwent full-text review. Eighteen independent studies evaluating the relationship between family history of POP and POP risk in 3639 POP cases and 10,912 controls were eligible for meta-analysis. Four studies evaluating family history and POP recurrence in 224 recurrent cases and 400 non-recurrent cases were eligible for inclusion into another meta-analyses. A positive family history of POP is on average associated with 2.3- to 2.7-fold increased risk for POP (RE OR = 2.64; 95% CI = 2.07, 3.35) as well as a 1.4-fold increased risk for POP recurrence (FE OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.00, 2.08). Meta-analysis estimates of POP risk varied by study design, definition of family history, and model adjustment status. We found evidence that publication bias and recall bias are a possibility.

Conclusions

Family history of POP is a risk factor for both POP presence and recurrence. However, reported magnitudes may be overestimates due to confounding, recall bias, and publication bias.

SUBMITTER: Samimi P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8086380 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Family history and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Samimi Parisa P Jones Sarah H SH Giri Ayush A

International urogynecology journal 20201021 4

<h4>Introduction and hypothesis</h4>Numerous analytic observational studies assess family history as a risk factor for POP and report a wide range of associations. This review aims to systematically evaluate the role of family history of POP in relation to POP risk and its recurrence.<h4>Methods</h4>A review was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE database with search criteria specifying family history, risk factors, POP, and their synonyms as title/abstract keywords, as well as MESH terms, up to Ma ...[more]

PMID: 33084962

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSacrocolpopexy is the gold standard procedure for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients with apical defects. Different surgical approaches have emerged and been utilized successively, including traditional laparoscopy, single-hole laparoscopy, robotic laparoscopy, vaginal-assisted laparoscopy, and transvaginal approaches. Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) has attracted increasing attention as an emerging surgical technique and has unique advantages, such as a "simulated wrist" mechanical arm and high-definition three-dimensional (3D) visual field, which has gradually begun to be utilized in the clinical setting.MethodsWe followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting checklist, and a systematic literature search was conducted on six databases from their inception to 1st March 2020. We evaluated patients with POP who underwent RSC or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), outcomes (including perioperative outcomes: blood loss, operating times, blood transfusion, and hospital stay), surgery-related complications, as well as cure and recurrence rates.ResultsA total of 49 articles were available, including 3,014 patients, among which 18 were comparative studies on LSC vs. RSC, and 31 were non-comparative single-arm studies on RSC. For RSC, median operative time was 226 [90-604] minutes, estimated blood loss was 56 [5-1,500] mL, and hospital stay was 1.55 [1-16] days. Intraoperative complications and postoperative complications occurred in 74 (2.7%) and 360 (13.0%) patients, respectively. Of 2,768 RSC patients, 40 had been converted from a robot-assisted approach to other approaches, and 134 of 1,852 patients (7.2%) have recurrent prolapses of any compartment. Compared to LSC, RSC was associated with significantly lower blood loss and lower conversion rate. However, more operative time was observed in RSC. No significant differences were observed in perioperative transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or objective recurrence between RSC and LSC.ConclusionsRSC's application seems to contribute some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to promote equivalent clinical outcomes. Notably, heterogeneity among studies might have affected the outcome of the study. Consequently, high-quality and large-sample randomized trials comparing both techniques are necessitated.

Project description:Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) improvement is one of the main outcomes in the management of pelvic organ prolapse as a chronic illness in women. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of surgical or pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was applied. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched for original articles that evaluated the QoL before and after surgical interventions or pessary in pelvic organ prolapse from 1 January 2012 until 30 June 2022 with a combination of proper keywords. Included studies were categorized based on interventions, and they were tabulated to summarize the results. Results: Overall, 587 citations were retrieved. Of these, 76 articles were found eligible for final review. Overall, three categories of intervention were identified: vaginal surgeries (47 studies), abdominal surgeries (18 studies), and pessary intervention (11 studies). Almost all interventions were associated with improved quality of life. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant association between the employment of surgical approach techniques (including vaginal and abdominal surgeries) and the quality of life (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) (MD: −48.08, 95% CI: −62.34 to −33.77, p-value < 0.01), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) (MD: −33.41, 95% CI: −43.48 to −23.34, p < 0.01)) and sexual activity of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ) (MD: 4.84, 95% CI: 1.75 to 7.92, p < 0.01)). Furthermore, narrative synthesis for studies investigating the effect of the pessary approach showed a positive association between the use of this instrument and improvement in the quality of life and sexual activity. Conclusions: The results of our study revealed a significant improvement in the women’s quality of life following abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. The use of pessary was also associated with increased patient quality of life.

Project description:BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects millions of women globally, with resource-limited countries, such as Ethiopia, carrying the highest burden. Previously, the prevalence of POP was estimated using seven studies. However, this study lacks generalization because of the limited number of studies and low geographical representation. In total, 12 additional primary studies were conducted after this review, and their reported prevalence was significantly variable across the studies. In addition, different new factors were reported in the primary studies. Therefore, this study aimed to update the pooled prevalence of POP and its associated factors in Ethiopia.MethodsThis study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles that were published between 2000 and 2023 were searched using the African Journal of Online, ScienceDirect, DOAJ, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and analyzed by Stata version 11. A random effect model was used to investigate the pooled prevalence of POP and its associated factors. The I2 test and Egger's regression test were used to detect the presence of heterogeneity and publication bias across studies, respectively.ResultA total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria and represented the data of 14,575 women. The pooled prevalence of POP was found to be 22.70%. History of home delivery (pooled odds ratio (OR) =2.93, 95% CI =1.46, 5.91), prolonged labor (OR = 4.63, 95% CI = 2.56, 8.38), history of perineal tear (OR = 4.83, 95% CI = 2.31, 10.11), instrumental delivery (OR =3.70, 95% CI =2.01, 6.81), grand multipara (OR = 5.42, 95% CI = 4.06, 7.23), family history of POP (OR = 3.30, 95% CI = 2.07, 5.25), and carrying heavy objects (OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 2.22, 4.70) were significantly associated with POP.ConclusionThe pooled prevalence of POP was high in Ethiopia. The Ministry of Health and clinicians should emphasize counseling on modifiable risk factors and develop further prevention strategies.

Project description:Female pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition associated with significant impact on women's lives from a biopsychosocial perspective. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and summarize the biopsychosocial profile of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Searches were completed from inception to October 2022 from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO and PEDro using a search string and in line with the Preferred Reporting Information for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. English language studies (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, qualitative research) investigating female pelvic organ prolapse and using a validated patient-reported outcome measure and validated pelvic organ prolapse objective measurement were examined. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full articles for eligibility. Data extraction included participant characteristics, pelvic organ prolapse grading and outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute Tool. Baseline mean score for each questionnaire or questionnaire domain in each category was presented in tertiles (low, moderate and high impact) to allow simple classification of impact. Of 8341 articles identified, 18 were included (n = 2075 women, age range = 22-85 years, parity range = 0-10). One objective outcome measure graded pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurement. Eleven validated patient-reported outcome measures were utilized; two pelvic organ prolapse-specific (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire), the remainder pelvic health (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7, Female Sexual Function Index, Urinary Distress Inventory-6, Kings Health Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7) or general health questionnaires (Short Form-36). Patient-reported outcome measures included in the review reported moderate levels of pain with sexual intercourse and low levels of bodily pain. Pelvic organ prolapse had a low to moderate impact in sleep/energy and quality of life and sexual function domains. Its impact on physical symptoms and general health perception domains was low. Patient-reported outcome measures results for physical functioning varied from low to high impact. More impact was demonstrated when using pelvic organ prolapse-specific patient-reported outcome measures. There are opportunities for improvement in the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research which would facilitate increased understanding of the biopsychosocial profile of women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Dataset Information

Family history and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Family history and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets