Dataset Information

A New Panel-Estimated GFR, Including β₂-Microglobulin and β-Trace Protein and Not Including Race, Developed in a Diverse Population.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale and objective

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFR_cr-cys) is more accurate than estimated GFR (eGFR) based on creatinine or cystatin C alone (eGFR_cr or eGFR_cys, respectively), but the inclusion of creatinine in eGFR_cr-cys requires specification of a person's race. β₂-Microglobulin (B2M) and β-trace protein (BTP) are alternative filtration markers that appear to be less influenced by race than creatinine is.

Study design

Study of diagnostic test accuracy.

Setting and participants

Development in a pooled population of 7 studies with 5,017 participants with and without chronic kidney disease. External validation in a pooled population of 7 other studies with 2,245 participants.

Tests compared

Panel eGFR using B2M and BTP in addition to cystatin C (3-marker panel) or creatinine and cystatin C (4-marker panel) with and without age and sex or race.

Outcomes

GFR measured as the urinary clearance of iothalamate, plasma clearance of iohexol, or plasma clearance of [⁵¹Cr]EDTA.

Results

Mean measured GFRs were 58.1 and 83.2 mL/min/1.73 m², and the proportions of Black participants were 38.6% and 24.0%, in the development and validation populations, respectively. In development, addition of age and sex improved the performance of all equations compared with equations without age and sex, but addition of race did not further improve the performance. In validation, the 4-marker panels were more accurate than the 3-marker panels (P < 0.001). The 3-marker panel without race was more accurate than eGFR_cys (percentage of estimates greater than 30% different from measured GFR [1 - P₃₀] of 15.6% vs 17.4%; P = 0.01), and the 4-marker panel without race was as accurate as eGFR_cr-cys (1 - P₃₀ of 8.6% vs 9.4%; P = 0.2). Results were generally consistent across subgroups.

Limitations

No representation of participants with severe comorbid illness and from geographic areas outside of North America and Europe.

Conclusions

The 4-marker panel eGFR is as accurate as eGFR_cr-cys without requiring specification of race. A more accurate race-free eGFR could be an important advance.

SUBMITTER: Inker LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8102017 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A New Panel-Estimated GFR, Including β2-Microglobulin and β-Trace Protein and Not Including Race, Developed in a Diverse Population.

Inker Lesley A LA Couture Sara J SJ Tighiouart Hocine H Abraham Alison G AG Beck Gerald J GJ Feldman Harold I HI Greene Tom T Gudnason Vilmundur V Karger Amy B AB Eckfeldt John H JH Kasiske Bertram L BL Mauer Michael M Navis Gerjan G Poggio Emilio D ED Rossing Peter P Shlipak Michael G MG Levey Andrew S AS

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 20201207 5

<h4>Rationale and objective</h4>Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) is more accurate than estimated GFR (eGFR) based on creatinine or cystatin C alone (eGFRcr or eGFRcys, respectively), but the inclusion of creatinine in eGFRcr-cys requires specification of a person's race. β2-Microglobulin (B2M) and β-trace protein (BTP) are alternative filtration markers that appear to be less influen ...[more]

PMID: 33301877

Similar Datasets

Project description:Backgroundβ-Trace protein (BTP) and β2-microglobulin (B2M) are novel glomerular filtration markers that have stronger associations with adverse outcomes than creatinine. Comparisons of BTP and B2M to creatinine and cystatin C are limited by the absence of rigorously developed glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations for the novel markers.Study designStudy of diagnostic test accuracy.Setting & participantsPooled database of 3 populations with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with mean measured GFR of 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 (N=3,551; MDRD [Modification of Diet in Renal Disease] Study, AASK [African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension], and CRIC [Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort] Study).Index testsGFR estimated using creatinine, cystatin C, BTP, or B2M level.Reference testGFR measured as the urinary clearance of iothalamate.ResultsFor BTP and B2M, coefficients for age, sex, and race were smaller than for creatinine and were similar or smaller than for cystatin C. For B2M, coefficients for sex, age, and race were smaller than for creatinine and were similar (age and race) or smaller (sex) than for cystatin C. The final equations with BTP (BTP, age, and sex) or B2M (B2M alone) were less accurate than either the CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or cystatin C equations. The combined BTP-B2M equation (BTP and B2M alone) had similar accuracy to the CKD-EPI creatinine or cystatin C equation. The average of the BTP-B2M equation and the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was not more accurate than the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation.LimitationsNo external validation population, study population was restricted to CKD, few participants older than 65 years, or nonblack nonwhite race.ConclusionsBTP and B2M are less influenced by age, sex, and race than creatinine and less influenced by race than cystatin C, but provide less accurate GFR estimates than the CKD-EPI creatinine and cystatin C equations. The CKD-EPI BTP and B2M equation provides a methodological advance for their study as filtration markers and in their associations with risk and adverse outcomes, but further study is required before clinical use.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveIn 2021, the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) updated the creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation and removed the coefficient for race. The development and validation of this equation involved binarizing race into African American and non-African American, involving few Asian participants. This study aimed to examine the difference between the 2021 equation and the previous 2009 equation on CKD prevalence estimates in 2 Asian populations.Study designObservational study using 2 national surveys.Setting & participantsParticipants from the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey and participants self-reported as Asian from the 2011-2020 US National Health and Nutrition Survey.ExposureeGFR using 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation.OutcomesPrevalence of CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or urine albumin-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g).Analytical approachSampling-weighted prevalence estimated using the 2009 and 2021 equations as well as the percentage of individuals with CKD G3+ using the 2009 equation being reclassified as not having CKD G3+ using the 2021 equation.ResultsThe prevalence of CKD estimated using the 2021 equation was 9.75% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 8.80-10.80%) in Koreans and 11.60% (95% CI, 10.23-13.13%) in US Asians. The prevalence of CKD estimated using the 2021 equation was slightly lower than that using the 2009 equation in both Korean and US Asian populations by 0.63% (95% CI, 0.44-0.90%) and 0.84% (95% CI, 0.52-1.34%), respectively. Furthermore, 32.8% and 30.2% of Koreans and US Asians with CKD G3-5, respectively, estimated using the 2009 equation were reclassified as not having CKD G3-5 when the eGFR was calculated using the 2021 equation.LimitationsMeasured GFR was not available.ConclusionsUse of the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation leads to a small decrease in CKD prevalence in both Korean and US Asian populations, and of similar magnitude, resulting in significant reclassification among those originally classified as having CKD G3+.

Project description:ImportanceAt a given estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), individuals who are Black have higher rates of mortality and kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) compared with those who are non-Black. Whether the recently adopted eGFR equations without race preserve racial differences in risk of mortality and KFRT at a given eGFR is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess whether eGFR equations with and without race and cystatin C document racial differences in risk of KFRT and mortality in populations including Black and non-Black participants.Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective individual-level data analysis of 62 011 participants from 5 general population and 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) US-based cohorts with serum creatinine, cystatin C, and follow-up for KFRT and mortality from 1988 to 2018.ExposuresChronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation with serum creatinine (eGFRcr with and without race), cystatin C (eGFRcys without race), or both markers (eGFRcr-cys without race).Main outcomes and measuresThe prevalence of decreased eGFR at baseline and hazard ratios of KFRT and mortality in Black vs non-Black participants were calculated, adjusted for age and sex. Analyses were performed within each cohort and with random-effect meta-analyses of the models.ResultsAmong 62 011 participants (20 773 Black and 41 238 non-Black; mean age, 63 years; 53% women), the prevalence ratio (95% CI; percent prevalences) of eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 comparing Black with non-Black participants was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93-1.03; 11% vs 12%) for eGFRcr with race, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98; 17% vs 18%) for eGFRcys, and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.2-1.3; 13% vs 11%) for eGFRcr-cys but was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-1.8; 15% vs 9%) for eGFRcr without race. During a mean follow-up of 13 years, 8% and 4% of Black and non-Black participants experienced KFRT and 34% and 39% died, respectively. Decreased eGFR was associated with significantly greater risk of both outcomes for all equations. At an eGFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the hazard ratios for KFRT comparing Black with non-Black participants were 2.8 (95% CI, 1.6-4.9) for eGFRcr with race, 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5-5.8) for eGFRcys, and 2.8 (95% CI, 1.4-5.4) for eGFRcr-cys vs 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.1) for eGFRcr without race. The 5-year absolute risk differences for KFRT comparing Black with non-Black participants were 1.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-2.6%) for eGFRcr with race, 1.1% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.9%) for eGFRcys, and 1.3% (95% CI, 0%-2.6%) for eGFRcr-cys vs 0.37% (95% CI, -0.32% to 1.05%) for eGFRcr without race. Similar patterns were observed for mortality.Conclusions and relevanceIn this retrospective analysis of 8 US cohorts including Black and non-Black individuals, the eGFR equation without race that included creatinine and cystatin C, but not the eGFR equation without race that included creatinine without cystatin C, demonstrated racial differences in the risk of KFRT and mortality throughout the range of eGFR. The eGFRcr-cys equation may be preferable to the eGFRcr equation without race for assessing racial differences in the risk of KFRT and mortality associated with low eGFR.

Project description:Assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is critical for diagnosis, staging, and management of kidney disease. However, accuracy of estimated GFR (eGFR) is limited by large errors (>30% error present in >10-50% of patients), adversely impacting patient care. Errors often result from variation across populations of non-GFR determinants affecting the filtration markers used to estimate GFR. We hypothesized that combining multiple filtration markers with non-overlapping non-GFR determinants into a panel GFR could improve eGFR accuracy, extending current recognition that adding cystatin C to serum creatinine improves accuracy. Non-GFR determinants of markers can affect the accuracy of eGFR in two ways: first, increased variability in the non-GFR determinants of some filtration markers among application populations compared to the development population may result in outlying values for those markers. Second, systematic differences in the non-GFR determinants of some markers between application and development populations can lead to biased estimates in the application populations. Here, we propose and evaluate methods for estimating GFR based on multiple markers in applications with potentially higher rates of outlying predictors than in development data. We apply transfer learning to address systematic differences between application and development populations. We evaluated a panel of 8 markers (5 metabolites and 3 low molecular weight proteins) in 3,554 participants from 9 studies. Results show that contamination in two strongly predictive markers can increase imprecision by more than two-fold, but outlier identification with robust estimation can restore precision nearly fully to uncontaminated data. Furthermore, transfer learning can yield similar results with even modest training set sample size. Combining both approaches addresses both sources of error in GFR estimates. Once the laboratory challenge of developing a validated targeted assay for additional metabolites is overcome, these methods can inform the use of a panel eGFR across diverse clinical settings, ensuring accuracy despite differing non-GFR determinants.

Project description:Assessment of GFR is central to clinical practice, research, and public health. Current Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommend measurement of serum creatinine to estimate GFR as the initial step in GFR evaluation. Serum creatinine is influenced by creatinine metabolism as well as GFR; hence, all equations to estimate GFR from serum creatinine include surrogates for muscle mass, such as age, sex, race, height, or weight. The guideline-recommended equation in adults (the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation) includes a term for race (specified as black versus nonblack), which improves the accuracy of GFR estimation by accounting for differences in non-GFR determinants of serum creatinine by race in the study populations used to develop the equation. In that study, blacks had a 16% higher average measured GFR compared with nonblacks with the same age, sex, and serum creatinine. The reasons for this difference are only partly understood, and the use of race in GFR estimation has limitations. Some have proposed eliminating the race coefficient, but this would induce a systematic underestimation of measured GFR in blacks, with potential unintended consequences at the individual and population levels. We propose a more cautious approach that maintains and improves accuracy of GFR estimates and avoids disadvantaging any racial group. We suggest full disclosure of use of race in GFR estimation, accommodation of those who decline to identify their race, and shared decision making between health care providers and patients. We also suggest mindful use of cystatin C as a confirmatory test as well as clearance measurements. It would be preferable to avoid specification of race in GFR estimation if there was a superior, evidence-based substitute. The goal of future research should be to develop more accurate methods for GFR estimation that do not require use of race or other demographic characteristics.