First Experience Addressing the Prognostic Utility of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Patients With COVID-19.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tantry US
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8194603 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
First Experience Addressing the Prognostic Utility of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Patients With COVID-19.
Tantry Udaya S US Bliden Kevin P KP Cho Alastair A Walia Naval N Dahlen Jeffrey R JR Ens Gordon G Traianova Malina M Jerjian Christophe C Usman Abira A Gurbel Paul A PA
Open forum infectious diseases 20210526 7
Urine 11-dehydro-thromboxane B<sub>2</sub> (u11-dh-TxB<sub>2</sub>), 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and liver-type fatty acid binding protein levels (L-FABP) at the time of hospitalization were higher in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with adverse events vs without events. Higher u11-dh-TxB<sub>2</sub> and L-FABP levels were associated with longer hospitalization, more thrombotic events, and greater mortality, providing evidence for potential utility as early prognostic biom ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Rationale & objectiveAcute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated with poor outcomes. Urinary biomarkers have been associated with adverse kidney outcomes in other settings and may provide additional prognostic information in patients with COVID-19. We investigated the association between urinary biomarkers and adverse kidney outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Study designProspective cohort study.Setting & participantsPatients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n=153) at 2 academic medical centers between April and June 2020.Exposure19 urinary biomarkers of injury, inflammation, and repair.OutcomeComposite of KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) stage 3 AKI, requirement for dialysis, or death within 60 days of hospital admission. We also compared various kidney biomarker levels in the setting of COVID-19 versus other common AKI settings.Analytical approachTime-varying Cox proportional hazards regression to associate biomarker level with composite outcome.ResultsOut of 153 patients, 24 (15.7%) experienced the primary outcome. Twofold higher levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) (HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.14-1.57]), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09-1.84]), and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) (HR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.38-2.99]) were associated with highest risk of sustaining primary composite outcome. Higher epidermal growth factor (EGF) levels were associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]). Individual biomarkers provided moderate discrimination and biomarker combinations improved discrimination for the primary outcome. The degree of kidney injury by biomarker level in COVID-19 was comparable to other settings of clinical AKI. There was evidence of subclinical AKI in COVID-19 patients based on elevated injury biomarker level in patients without clinical AKI defined by serum creatinine.LimitationsSmall sample size with low number of composite outcome events.ConclusionsUrinary biomarkers are associated with adverse kidney outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and may provide valuable information to monitor kidney disease progression and recovery.
| S-EPMC8542781 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has led to a catastrophic shortage of ICU beds. This has resulted in the need to identify patients that can be discharged early before full clinical recovery. We designed this study to determine if in changes routine tests like CBCD and CRP can be a useful complement to clinical status when deciding to discharge patients from ICU.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted in Rafic Hariri University Hospital. Levels of biomarkers measured at admission (T1) and within 3 days of outcome (T2) were collected and ratios (T2/T1) were calculated. The Odds Ratios of association between the changes in these biomarkers and outcome were estimated. Multivariate analysis and AUC for the performance of these biomarkers were also conducted.ResultsWe found on multivariate analysis that reduction in counts of lymphocyte and platelets and elevation in counts of neutrophils and level of CRP (T2/T1 ratio > 1) are strongly associated with mortality with respective ORs estimated at 6.74, 3.26, 5.65 and 4.34 [p-values < 0.001]. AUCs were found to lie in a range of 0.68 to 0.81 indicating fair to good performance. Other factors found to impact survival were AKI, AF and ACS [p-values < 0.01]. In contrast to other studies, risk factors didn't show an association with survival when adjusted for effects of complications and changes in biomarker levels.ConclusionsOur results confirm that inexpensive tests like lymphocyte count and CRP can be reliably used to follow COVID-19 patients in ICU and to support the decision to discharge patients.
| S-EPMC9278762 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented threat to humanity that has provoked global health concerns. Since the etiopathogenesis of this illness is not fully characterized, the prognostic factors enabling treatment decisions have not been well documented. Accurately predicting the progression of the disease would aid in appropriate patient categorization and thus help determine the best treatment option. Here, we have introduced a proteomic approach utilizing data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) to identify the serum proteins that are closely associated with COVID-19 prognosis. Twenty-seven proteins were differentially expressed between severely ill COVID-19 patients with an adverse or favorable prognosis.
2021-11-02 | PXD021702 | JPOST Repository
Project description:Biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular events in community-based populations have not consistently added information to standard risk factors. A limitation of many previously studied biomarkers is their lack of cardiovascular specificity.To determine the prognostic value of 3 novel biomarkers induced by cardiovascular stress, we measured soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I in 3428 participants (mean age, 59 years; 53% women) in the Framingham Heart Study. We performed multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards models to assess the individual and combined ability of the biomarkers to predict adverse outcomes. We also constructed a "multimarker" score composed of the 3 biomarkers in addition to B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 years, there were 488 deaths, 336 major cardiovascular events, 162 heart failure events, and 142 coronary events. In multivariable-adjusted models, the 3 new biomarkers were associated with each end point (P<0.001) except coronary events. Individuals with multimarker scores in the highest quartile had a 3-fold risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.7; P<0.001), 6-fold risk of heart failure (6.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-14.8; P<0.001), and 2-fold risk of cardiovascular events (1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.7; P=0.001). Addition of the multimarker score to clinical variables led to significant increases in the c statistic (P=0.005 or lower) and net reclassification improvement (P=0.001 or lower).Multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are detectable in ambulatory individuals and add prognostic value to standard risk factors for predicting death, overall cardiovascular events, and heart failure.
| S-EPMC3656719 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThis study explored circulating pneumoproteins in the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of COVID-19 by meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched five databases and other sources until December 16, 2021. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were the overall outcomes. RevMan 5.3, Stata 16, and Meta-DiSc 1.4 were utilized for pooled analysis.ResultsA total of 2432 subjects from 26 studies were included. Patients with COVID-19 had higher circulating KL-6, SP-D, and SP-A levels (SMD 1.34, 95% CI [0.60, 2.08]; SMD 1.74, 95% CI [0.64, 2.84]; SMD 3.42, 95% CI [1.31, 5.53], respectively) than healthy individuals. Circulating SP-D levels were not significantly different in survivors and non-survivors (SMD - 0.19, 95% CI [- 0.78, 0.40]). Circulating KL-6, SP-D, and RAGE levels in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 were significantly lower (SMD - 0.93, 95% CI [- 1.22, - 0.65]; SMD - 1.32, 95% CI [- 2.34, - 0.29]; SMD - 1.17, 95% CI [- 2.06, - 0.28], respectively) than in patients with severe COVID-19. Subgroup analysis suggested that country and total number may be related to the heterogeneity when analyzing SP-D in patients with mild to moderate vs. severe COVID-19. The meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy including KL-6 for severity, KL-6 for mortality, and SP-D for severity demonstrated that they all had limited diagnostic value.ConclusionTherefore, circulating pneumoproteins (KL-6, SP-D, and RAGEs) reflect the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of COVID-19, and follow-up studies are still needed.
| S-EPMC9403970 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) posts a challenge for the understanding of factors affecting disease severity and the identification of prognostic biomarkers and physiological processes relevant for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to contribute to the control of this pandemic. To address this challenge, in this study we used a quantitative proteomics together with multiple data analysis algorithms to characterize serum protein profiles in five cohorts from healthy to SARS-CoV-2-infected asymptomatic, recovered, nonsevere and severe individuals. The results corroborated previous findings, but the analysis was focused on novel disease processes and biomarkers. Our results contributed to the characterization of SARS-CoV-2-host molecular interactions and provided protein prognostic biomarkers and physiological disorders associated with COVID-19 with potential implications for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to contribute to the control of this pandemic.
2021-11-03 | PXD024549 | Pride
Project description:Background and aimThe study aimed to determine whether the MPs levels and platelet activation are affected by the COVID-19 infection in both malignant and non-malignant patients compared to healthy individuals and define their contribution to the COVID-19 associated coagulopathy and the relation of these MPs to other hematologic parameters.Patients and methodsWe recruited 23 malignant patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive COVID-19, also, 19 COVID-19 non-malignant patients, and 20 healthy volunteers were also enrolled for comparison. Blood samples were collected from patients and healthy donors into 5 mL vacutainer tube containing 3.5% buffered sodium citrate solution for measurement of total microparticles (TMPs), platelet microparticles (PMPs), endothelial microparticles (EMPs), CD62 activated platelets, and CD41 platelet marker.ResultsCOVID-19 malignant patients had significantly lower hemoglobin and platelets compared to COVID non-malignant ones, while they had significantly higher C-reactive protein, LDH, AST, Albunim, creatinine, and prognostic index (PI) compared to COVID-19 non-malignant patients. significant accumulations of TMPs, PMPs, EMPs, and activated platelets in COVID-19 affected patients compared to healthy controls. TMPs, and EMPs were significantly accumulated in COVID-19 malignant compared to COVID-19 non-malignant patients with no significant difference in PMPs between both.ConclusionCirculating MPs and activated platelets may be promising novel prognostic biomarkers capable of identifying potentially severe COVID-19 patients who require immediate care especially in cancer patients.
| S-EPMC7899358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Multiple Biomarkers have recently been shown to be elevated in COVID-19, a respiratory infection with multi-organ dysfunction; however, information regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers as it relates to disease severity and cardiac injury are inconsistent. The goal of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding the prognostic relevance of cardiac biomarkers from data available in published reports. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from inception through April 2020 for studies comparing median values of cardiac biomarkers in critically ill versus non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, or patients who died versus those who survived. The weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between the groups were calculated for each study and combined using a random effects meta-analysis model. The odds ratio (OR) for mortality based on cardiac injury was combined from studies reporting it. Troponin levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients who died or were critically ill versus those who were alive or not critically ill (WMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.70, p < 0.001). Additionally, BNP levels were also significantly higher in patients who died or were critically ill (WMD 0.45, 95% CI - 0.21-0.69, p < 0.001). Cardiac injury was independently associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (OR 6.641, 95% CI 1.26-35.1, p = 0.03). A significant difference in levels of D-dimer was seen in those who died or were critically ill. CK levels were only significantly higher in those who died versus those who were alive (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.25-1.33, p = 0.004). Cardiac biomarkers add prognostic value to the determination of the severity of COVID-19 and can predict mortality.
| S-EPMC7925599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immunization programmes have been globally recognized as one of the most successful medical interventions against infectious diseases. Despite the proven efficacy and safety profiles of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, there are still a substantial number of people who express vaccine hesitancy. Factors that influence vaccine decision-making are heterogenous, complex, and context specific and may be caused or amplified by uncontrolled online information or misinformation. With respect to COVID-19, the recent emergence of novel variants of concern that give rise to milder disease also drives vaccine hesitancy. Healthcare professionals remain one of the most trusted groups to advise and provide information to those ambivalent about COVID-19 vaccination and should be equipped with adequate resources and information as well as practical guidance to empower them to effectively discuss concerns. This article seeks to summarize the currently available information to address the most common concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination.
| S-EPMC9225513 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Central neurocytomas (CN) are intraventricular brain tumors predominantly occurring in young adults. Although prognosis is usually favorable, tumor recurrence is common, particularly following subtotal resection (STR). Currently, the risk of progression is evaluated using histopathological criteria, such as atypical features and elevated Ki67 proliferation index. However, these markers lack consistent definitions and application. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles were examined in 136 tumors histologically classified as CN. Clinical and histopathological characteristics were assessed in 93 and 90 cases, and whole-exome sequencing was conducted in 12 cases. Clinical and molecular characteristics were integrated into a survival model to predict progression-free survival (PFS). A diagnosis of CN was epigenetically confirmed in 125 of 136 cases (92%). No DNA methylation subgroups associated with risk were identified, but global DNA hypomethylation emerged as a hallmark feature of CN. Hypomethylation at the FGFR3 locus, accompanied by increased FGFR3 protein expression, was observed in 97% of cases. Exome-sequencing revealed BCR frameshift mutations in 3/12 cases. Gross total resection was associated with significantly improved PFS compared to subtotal resected tumors (STR), while patients undergoing STR benefited from adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.00088). Younger patients were identified as having a higher risk of recurrence (p = 0.026). Patient age and treatment strategy were key factors influencing survival outcomes in this cohort. These findings underscore the importance of closer follow-up for younger patients and recommend radiotherapy for STR cases. Furthermore, FGFR3 represents a hallmark feature and potential therapeutic target warranting further investigation.
2025-06-18 | GSE288337 | GEO