Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Acquired haemophilia A: successful treatment of a patient using upfront immunosuppressive therapy and haemostatic agents.

ABSTRACT: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and possibly fatal autoimmune disorder that is challenging to treat. Although a majority of cases are idiopathic, AHA can also be associated with an underlying malignancy, autoimmune disorder, pregnancy, infection or certain medications. The diagnosis and treatment of AHA require a specialist with both clinical and laboratory expertise. The goal of treatment is aimed at achieving haemostasis as well as eradicating factor inhibitors. We present a patient with AHA and life-threatening haemorrhage who was successfully treated with a combination of haemostatic agents and a triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. In reviewing recent studies and published guidelines, we advocate that a newer agent, emicizumab, can potentially be incorporated into the treatment protocol for AHA given its promising performance in the realm of congenital haemophilia.

SUBMITTER: Chung SY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8217947 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Acquired haemophilia A: successful treatment of a patient using upfront immunosuppressive therapy and haemostatic agents.

Chung Su Yun SY Shen Janice Gloria JG Sticco Kristin Lynn KL

BMJ case reports 20210621 6

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and possibly fatal autoimmune disorder that is challenging to treat. Although a majority of cases are idiopathic, AHA can also be associated with an underlying malignancy, autoimmune disorder, pregnancy, infection or certain medications. The diagnosis and treatment of AHA require a specialist with both clinical and laboratory expertise. The goal of treatment is aimed at achieving haemostasis as well as eradicating factor inhibitors. We present a patient wit ...[more]

PMID: 34155028

Similar Datasets

Persistence of haemostatic response following gene therapy with valoctocogene roxaparvovec in severe haemophilia A.

Project description:IntroductionValoctocogene roxaparvovec is an investigational AAV5-based factor VIII (FVIII) gene therapy that has demonstrated sustained clinical benefit in people with severe haemophilia A.AimTo report safety, tolerability, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) among participants who received valoctocogene roxaparvovec in a phase 1/2 clinical study (NCT02576795).MethodsMen ≥18 years of age with severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤1 IU/dl) without history of FVIII inhibitors or anti-AAV5 antibodies received a single infusion of valoctocogene roxaparvovec and were followed for 5 years (6 × 1013 vg/kg dose, n = 7) and 4 years (4 × 1013 vg/kg dose, n = 6).ResultsOver the past 2 years, few adverse events and no FVIII inhibitors were reported. Per chromogenic substrate (CSA) assay at years 5 and 4, four of seven and three of six participants in the 6 × 1013 and 4 × 1013 vg/kg cohorts, respectively, maintained median FVIII levels >5 IU/dl, corresponding to mild haemophilia. By regression analysis, rate of change in FVIII activity was -0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.32 to .03) IU/dl/wk in the 6 × 1013 vg/kg cohort in year 5 and -.06 (95% CI: -.14 to .01) IU/dl/wk in the 4 × 1013 vg/kg cohort in year 4. No participants resumed FVIII prophylaxis, and eight of 13 participants reported zero bleeds in the past 2 years. Improved QOL from baseline persisted in the 6 × 1013 vg/kg cohort; all six Haemo-QOL-A domain scores increased. For the 4 × 1013 vg/kg cohort, high baseline Haemo-QOL-A scores persisted.ConclusionThese results demonstrate transgene expression and haemostatic response for up to 5 years in individuals with haemophilia A.

| S-EPMC9291073 | biostudies-literature

Pro-coagulant haemostatic factors for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in people without haemophilia.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6517302 | biostudies-literature

Management of acquired haemophilia A in severe Covid-19: Haemostatic bridging with emicizumab to keep the balance between bleeding and thrombosis.

Project description:Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies blocking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Haemostatic management of AHA and concomitant thrombotic risk is difficult. We cover the management of a 75-year-old male with severe Covid-19, a prothrombotic disease, and de novo AHA with severe muscle bleeding, a disease requiring highly thrombogenic haemostatic therapy and immunosuppression-a challenging combination. FVIII activity was measured using human and bovine reagents to differentiate between endo- and exogenous FVIII activity. For haemostatic control, recombinant human activated FVII was given, followed by emicizumab, as a less thrombogenic long-term haemostatic agent. Steroids were used as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Later, rituximab was used for inhibitor eradication. No thromboembolic events occurred, and bleeding was effectively controlled. Emicizumab achieved haemostatic balance in a patient under haemorrhagic and thrombogenic conditions. Individual risk assessment is needed to guide treatment decisions in patients threatened by simultaneous bleeding and thrombosis.

| S-EPMC9877795 | biostudies-literature

Zero incidence of factor VIII inhibitors and successful haemostatic response in previously factor VIII-treated patients with haemophilia A switching to turoctocog alfa in a noninterventional study.

Project description:IntroductionTuroctocog alfa (NovoEight® ) is a B-domain-truncated recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) approved for patients with haemophilia A.AimTo investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in routine clinical practice.MethodsGuardian 5 was a prospective, multinational, non-interventional, post-authorisation safety study. Male previously treated patients (> 150 exposure days [EDs]) of any age with severe/moderately severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤ 2%) and a negative inhibitor test prior to first dosing (independent of FVIII-inhibitor history) were included to receive prophylaxis or on-demand treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients developing FVIII inhibitors (≥.6 Bethesda Units [BU]) after baseline visit, measured as per routine practice of each study site during clinic visits. Secondary endpoints included haemostatic effect, annualised bleeding rate (ABR), and adverse reactions assessment. The study concluded when 50 patients reached 100 EDs/patient minimum.ResultsSeventy patients were screened and 68 exposed to turoctocog alfa; 63 (92.6%) were on prophylaxis and five received on-demand treatment. Six (8.8%) patients reported a history of positive inhibitors. During the study, patients were exposed to turoctocog alfa for a mean (standard deviation) of 131.9 (99.0) days/patient. Fifty-five of 58 patients who completed the study were tested for FVIII inhibitors; no positive tests were reported. Overall success rate of turoctocog alfa for treatment of bleeds was 87.3%. Among patients receiving prophylaxis, median (range) ABR was 1.97 (.0-25.5) bleeds/year; estimated ABR (negative binomial model) was 3.65 (95% confidence interval: 2.53-5.25).ConclusionTuroctocog alfa was safe and efficacious for haemophilia A treatment in routine clinical practice.

| S-EPMC9298792 | biostudies-literature

Acquired haemophilia A: Italian Consensus Recommendations on diagnosis, general management and treatment of bleeding.

Project description:BackgroundAcquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder due to autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII that may be secondary to autoimmune diseases, cancer, drugs, pregnancy, infections, or be idiopathic. Recurrent bleeding, often severe, mostly in muscles and soft tissues, and isolated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), in the absence of personal and family history of bleeding, are typical features that should raise the suspicion of AHA. Poor awareness of the disease results in diagnostic delays and inappropriate treatment.Materials and methodsThe Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) developed consensus recommendations in cooperation with the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET). The document was shared with scientific societies of specialist physicians, laboratory professionals and pharmacists to spread knowledge about AHA and promote appropriate diagnosis/treatment.ResultsReady availability of the aPTT mixing test is crucial, although diagnostic confirmation and optimal management require prompt referral of patients to specialised centres with rapidly available diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. If immediate referral is unfeasible, treatment must be undertaken early, under guidance of specialised centres or based on shared protocols. Recommendations about diagnosis, general management and, in bleeding patients, haemostatic therapy using bypassing agents or replacement treatment, including the recently available recombinant porcine factor VIII, are provided, considering the different clinical settings and laboratory facilities.DiscussionThis consensus document aims to improve the overall healthcare pathways for AHA, harmonise the management and therapeutic approaches to newly diagnosed patients and reduce the still relevant complications and mortality in this setting.

| S-EPMC9068356 | biostudies-literature

Efficacy of eltrombopag with immunosuppressive therapy for children with acquired aplastic anemia.

Project description:BackgroundEltrombopag (EPAG), an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), has been proven to improve the hematologic response without increasing toxic effects as a first-line therapy combined with standard immunosuppressive treatment (IST) in adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Nevertheless, the clinical evidence on the efficacy of EPAG in children with acquired aplastic anemia is limited and controversial.MethodsWe performed a single-center, retrospective study to analyze the clinical outcomes of fifteen patients aged ≤18 years with newly diagnosed acquired SAA who received first-line IST and EPAG (EPAG group) compared with those of forty-five patients who received IST alone (IST group) by propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsThere was no difference in the overall response (OR) rate between the EPAG group and IST group (53.3% vs. 46.7% at 3 months, P = 0.655; 66.7% vs. 57.8% at 6 months, P = 0.543), but the complete response (CR) rate was statistically significant (20.0% vs. 4.4% at 3 months, P = 0.094; 46.7% vs. 13.3% at 6 months, P = 0.012). The median time to achieve a hematological response in the EPAG and IST groups was 105 days and 184 days, respectively. No difference was observed in the event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS) rates.ConclusionAdding EPAG to standard IST as the first-line treatment for children with acquired SAA improved the rapidity of hematological response and the CR rate but did not improve the OR or EFS rates.

| S-EPMC9872003 | biostudies-literature

Patient perspectives regarding gene therapy in haemophilia: Interviews from the PAVING study.

Project description:IntroductionExploring patient perceptions regarding gene therapies may provide insights about their acceptability to patients.ObjectiveTo investigate opinions of people with haemophilia (PWH) regarding gene therapies. Moreover, this study aimed to identify patient-relevant attributes (treatment features) that influence PWH's treatment choices.MethodsSemi-structured individual interviews were conducted with Belgian PWH, types A and B. A predefined interview guide included information sections and open, attribute ranking and case questions. Qualitative data were organized using NVivo 12 and analysed following framework analysis. Sum totals of scores obtained in the ranking exercise were calculated per attribute.ResultsIn total, 20 PWH participated in the interviews. Most participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards gene therapy and were very willing (40%; n = 8) or willing (35%; n = 7) to receive this treatment. The following five attributes were identified as most important to PWH in making their choice: annual bleeding rate, factor level, uncertainty of long-term risks, impact on daily life, and probability that prophylaxis can be stopped. While participants were concerned about the uncertainty regarding long-term safety, most participants were less concerned about uncertainty regarding long-term efficacy.ConclusionsThis qualitative study showed that most PWH have a positive attitude towards gene therapy and that besides efficacy, safety and the related uncertainties, also impact on daily life is important to patients. The identified patient-relevant attributes may be used by regulators, health technology assessment bodies and payers in their evaluation of gene therapies for haemophilia. Moreover, they may inform clinical trial design, pay-for-performance schemes and real-world evidence studies.

| S-EPMC7894464 | biostudies-literature

Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10032461 | biostudies-literature

How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective.

Project description:Gene therapy has the potential to revolutionise treatment for patients with haemophilia and is close to entering clinical practice. While factor concentrates have improved outcomes, individuals still face a lifetime of injections, pain, progressive joint damage, the potential for inhibitor development and impaired quality of life. Recently published studies in adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy have demonstrated improvement in endogenous factor levels over sustained periods, significant reduction in annualised bleed rates, lower exogenous factor usage and thus far a positive safety profile. In making the shared decision to proceed with gene therapy for haemophilia, physicians should make it clear that research is ongoing and that there are remaining evidence gaps, such as long-term safety profiles and duration of treatment effect. The eligibility criteria for gene therapy trials mean that key patient groups may be excluded, eg children/adolescents, those with liver or kidney dysfunction and those with a prior history of factor inhibitors or pre-existing neutralising AAV antibodies. Gene therapy offers a life-changing opportunity for patients to reduce their bleeding risk while also reducing or abrogating the need for exogenous factor administration. Given the expanding evidence base, both physicians and patients will need sources of clear and reliable information to be able to discuss and judge the risks and benefits of treatment.

| S-EPMC6852207 | biostudies-literature

Treatment optimization of maintenance immunosuppressive agents in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Project description:Introduction: Graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant patients has increased significantly within the last three decades, correlating with the discovery and utilization of new immunosuppressants as well as improvements in patient care. Despite these developments in graft survival for patients, there is still improvement needed, particularly in long-term care in pediatric patients receiving grafts from deceased donor patients. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapies have narrow therapeutic indices and are associated with high inter-individual and intra-individual variability.Areas covered: In this review, we examine the impact of pharmacokinetic variability on renal transplantation and its association with age, genetic polymorphisms, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, renal insufficiency, route of administration, and branded versus generic drug formulation. Pharmacodynamics are outlined in terms of the mechanism of action for each immunosuppressant, potential adverse effects, and the utility of pharmacodynamic biomarkers.Expert opinion: Acquiring abetter quantitative understanding of immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic components should help clinicians implement treatment regimens to maintain the balance between therapeutic efficacy and drug-related toxicity.

| S-EPMC10726690 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data