Dataset Information

Adapting to a New Normal After Severe Acute Brain Injury: An Observational Cohort Using a Sequential Explanatory Design.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Treatment decisions following severe acute brain injury need to consider patients' goals-of-care and long-term outcomes. Using family members as respondents, we aimed to assess patients' goals-of-care in the ICU and explore the impact of adaptation on survivors who did not reach the level of recovery initially considered acceptable.

Design

Prospective, observational, mixed-methods cohort study.

Setting

Comprehensive stroke and level 1 trauma center in Pacific Northwest United States.

Participants

Family members of patients with severe acute brain injury in an ICU for greater than 2 days and Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 12.

Measurements and main results

At enrollment, we asked what level of physical and cognitive recovery the patient would find acceptable. At 6 months, we assessed level of recovery through family surveys and chart review. Families of patients whose outcome was below that considered acceptable were invited for semistructured interviews, examined with content analysis.

Results

For 184 patients, most family members set patients' minimally acceptable cognitive recovery at "able to think and communicate" or better (82%) and physical recovery at independence or better (66%). Among 170 patients with known 6-month outcome, 40% had died in hospital. Of 102 survivors, 33% were able to think and communicate, 13% were independent, and 10% died after discharge. Among survivors whose family member had set minimally acceptable cognitive function at "able to think and communicate," 64% survived below that level; for those with minimally acceptable physical function at independence, 80% survived below that. Qualitative analysis revealed two key themes: families struggled to adapt to a new, yet uncertain, normal and asked for support and guidance with ongoing treatment decisions.

Conclusions and relevance

Six months after severe acute brain injury, most patients survived to a state their families initially thought would not be acceptable. Survivors and their families need more support and guidance as they adapt to a new normal and struggle with persistent uncertainty.

SUBMITTER: Rutz Voumard R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8282680 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adapting to a New Normal After Severe Acute Brain Injury: An Observational Cohort Using a Sequential Explanatory Design.

Rutz Voumard Rachel R Kiker Whitney A WA Dugger Kaley M KM Engelberg Ruth A RA Borasio Gian Domenico GD Curtis J Randall JR Jox Ralf J RJ Creutzfeldt Claire J CJ

Critical care medicine 20210801 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>Treatment decisions following severe acute brain injury need to consider patients' goals-of-care and long-term outcomes. Using family members as respondents, we aimed to assess patients' goals-of-care in the ICU and explore the impact of adaptation on survivors who did not reach the level of recovery initially considered acceptable.<h4>Design</h4>Prospective, observational, mixed-methods cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>Comprehensive stroke and level 1 trauma center in Pacific Nor ...[more]

PMID: 33730742

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex condition common among individuals treated in behavioral healthcare, but TBI screening has not been adopted in these settings which can affect optimal clinical decision-making. Integrating evidence-based practices that address complex health comorbidities into behavioral healthcare settings remains understudied in implementation science, limited by few studies using theory-driven hypotheses to disentangle relationships between proximal and medial indicators on distal implementation outcomes. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, we examined providers' attitudes, perceived behavioral control (PBC), subjective norms, and intentions to adopt The Ohio State University TBI Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) in behavioral healthcare settings.MethodsWe used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. In Phase I, 215 providers from 25 organizations in the USA completed training introducing the OSU TBI-ID, followed by a survey assessing attitudes, PBC, norms, and intentions to screen for TBI. After 1 month, providers completed another survey assessing the number of TBI screens conducted. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with logistic regressions. In Phase II, 20 providers were purposively selected for semi-structured interviews to expand on SEM results. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, integrated with quantitative results, and combined into joint displays.ResultsOnly 25% (55/215) of providers adopted TBI screening, which was driven by motivations to trial the intervention. Providers who reported more favorable attitudes (OR: 0.67, p < .001) and greater subjective norms (OR: 0.12, p < .001) toward TBI screening demonstrated increased odds of intention to screen, which resulted in greater TBI screening adoption (OR: 0.30; p < .01). PBC did not affect intentions or adoption. Providers explained that although TBI screening can improve diagnostic and clinical decision-making, they discussed that additional training, leadership engagement, and state-level mandates are needed to increase the widespread, systematic uptake of TBI screening.ConclusionsThis study advances implementation science by using theory-driven hypothesis testing to disentangle proximal and medial indicators at the provider level on TBI screening adoption. Our mixed-methods approach added in-depth contextualization and illuminated additional multilevel determinants affecting intervention adoption, which guides a more precise selection of implementation strategies.

Project description:BackgroundLicensure and registration are the traditional approaches to ensure minimally acceptable standards of care for practice. However, due to advances in medical technology and changes in clinical practice, the knowledge and skills obtained from basic education and training may rapidly become out of date. There is no mandated, structured and ongoing mechanism to assess all doctors' competence in Hong Kong. This paper assessed doctors' perceived needs for continuous professional development, and to identify facilitators and barriers that are likely to influence the implementation of compulsory continuous professional development for maintaining professional competence and ensuring patient safety.MethodsAn explanatory sequential mixed method design with two distinct interactive phases was adopted comprising a postal self-administered questionnaire survey among a random sample of 2,459 of doctors (Phase 1), followed by individual interviews of a stratified sample of 30 questionnaire respondents for the subsequent qualitative analysis (Phase 2).ResultsThe majority of doctors (over 90%) agreed the importance of continuous professional development to update knowledge and skills. However, just 30.7% of non-specialists compared with 65.4% of specialists agreed it would be desirable for continuous professional development to be a requirement for renewal of licenses. A relatively higher percentage of non-specialists compared with specialists reported barriers to participation such as accessibility, availability and relevance of the content of the programmes. Facilitators for uptake included more convenient schedule and location, relevant content, and incentives for participation such as making this a pre-condition for enrolling in government-funded services.ConclusionsTo address the needs of individual doctors, the spheres of practice, personal preferences and learning styles should be considered in deciding the content and processes of continuous professional development. Flexibility is also an important principle. A learning model, incentives for participation and a compliance strategy (instead of deterrence) could be effective strategy for continuous professional development.

Project description:BackgroundEven patients with normal computed tomography (CT) head imaging may experience persistent symptoms for months to years after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is currently no good way to predict recovery and triage patients who may benefit from early follow-up and targeted intervention. We aimed to assess if existing prognostic models can be improved by serum biomarkers or diffusion tensor imaging metrics (DTI) from MRI, and if serum biomarkers can identify patients for DTI.MethodsWe included 1025 patients aged >18 years with a Glasgow Coma Score >12 and normal CT from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study which recruited between December 19,2014 and December 17, 2017 (NCT02210221). Biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, S100B) were obtained at a median of 8.8 h (Q1-Q3 4.2-16.7) and DTI at 13 days (3-19) after injury. DTI metrics were available in 153 patients for 48 white matter tracts (ICBM-DTI-81 atlas). Incomplete recovery at three months was defined as an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score <8. Existing prognostic models were fitted with and without biomarkers, or with and without DTI, and internally validated using bootstrapping.Findings385 (38%) patients had incomplete recovery. Adding biomarkers did not improve performance beyond the best existing clinical prognostic model [optimism-corrected AUC 0.69 (95% CI 0.65-0.72) and R2 17% (11-22)]. Adding DTI metrics significantly enhanced all models [best optimism-corrected AUC 0.82 (0.79-0.85) and R2 75% (39-100)]. The top three prognostic tracts were the left posterior thalamic radiation, left superior cerebellar peduncle and right uncinate fasciculus. Serum biomarkers could have avoided 1 in 5 DTI scans, with GFAP <12 h and NFL 12-24 h from injury performing best.InterpretationDTI substantially improved existing prognostic models for functional outcome in patients with mTBI and a normal CT, and biomarkers could help select patients for MRI. If validated, DTI could allow for targeted follow-up and enrichment of clinical trials of early interventions to improve outcome.FundingEU Seventh Framework Programme, Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, NeuroTrauma Sciences.

Project description:Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is widely used in the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is limited evidence about the efficacy of ICP monitoring in older subjects (aged ≥65 years). This study evaluated the effect of intraventricular ICP monitoring on the outcome of older adults suffering from a severe TBI.This prospective, observational study included 166 older TBI patients (aged ≥65 years) with Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) scores lower than 9 at admission. The study cohort was divided into two groups, intraventricular ICP monitoring and non-ICP monitoring. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score 6 months after injury, the ICU and total hospital lengths of stay, and mechanical ventilation days.There were 80 patients in the intraventricular ICP monitoring group and 86 patients in non-ICP monitoring group. There was no statistical difference between groups in demographics and severity of head injury. Patients treated with intraventricular ICP monitoring had lower in-hospital mortality (33.8 % vs 51.2 %, P < 0.05), a higher 6-month GOS score (3.0 ± 1.4 vs 2.5 ± 1.2 P < 0.05), and a lower dosage (514 ± 246 g vs 840 ± 323 g, P < 0.0001) and shorter duration (7.2 ± 3.6 days vs 8.4 ± 4.3 days, P < 0.01) of mannitol use. However, the ICU length of stay (14.3 ± 6.4 days vs 11.6 ± 5.8 days, P < 0.01) and mechanical ventilation days (6.7 ± 3.5 days vs 5.6 ± 2.4 days, P < 0.05) were longer in the ICP monitoring group. The total length of hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (28.5 ± 12.1 days vs 26.1 ± 13.5 days, P = 0.23).Intraventricular ICP monitoring may have beneficial effects on the decreased in-hospital mortality and improved 6-month outcome of older patients with severe TBI. However, given that this was an observational study conducted in a single institution, further well-designed randomized control trials are needed to evaluate the effect of intraventricular ICP monitoring on the outcome of older severe TBI patients.

Dataset Information

Adapting to a New Normal After Severe Acute Brain Injury: An Observational Cohort Using a Sequential Explanatory Design.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Measurements and main results

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Adapting to a New Normal After Severe Acute Brain Injury: An Observational Cohort Using a Sequential Explanatory Design.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets