Dataset Information

Arterial Stiffness Predicts General Anesthesia-Induced Vasopressor-Resistant Hypotension in Patients Taking Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Patients chronically treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) may develop hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. A fraction of these patients are resistant to therapeutic doses of vasopressors, which poses serious concerns for hemodynamic management. The authors hypothesized that the patients who develop refractory hypotension, compared with those who do not, show lower central arterial stiffness due to the profound effect of ACEIs.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Single tertiary center.

Interventions

Fifty surgical patients chronically treated with ACEIs were enrolled. Prior to surgery, all the patients had central arterial stiffness assessment measured by carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the systolic blood pressure response during the first 10 minutes after induction of general anesthesia: a vasopressor-resistant hypotension group requiring more than 200 µg phenylephrine, or a control group requiring no more than 200 µg of phenylephrine to maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg during the study period.

Measurements and main results

Carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity was significantly lower in the vasopressor-resistant hypotension group compared to the control group (7.6 [7.2-8.3] m/s v 9.9 [8.7-12.0] m/s, p = 0.001 [Hodges-Lehman median difference 2.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-4.4]).

Conclusion

These findings suggested that preoperative measurement of carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity in patients chronically treated with ACEIs could help identify patients at increased risk of developing hypotension refractory to vasopressors after induction of general anesthesia.

SUBMITTER: Ueda K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8528715 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arterial Stiffness Predicts General Anesthesia-Induced Vasopressor-Resistant Hypotension in Patients Taking Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.

Ueda Kenichi K Janiczek David M DM Casey Darren P DP

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 20200822 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>Patients chronically treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) may develop hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. A fraction of these patients are resistant to therapeutic doses of vasopressors, which poses serious concerns for hemodynamic management. The authors hypothesized that the patients who develop refractory hypotension, compared with those who do not, show lower central arterial stiffness due to the profound effect of ACEIs.<h4>Design</ ...[more]

PMID: 32921603

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNorepinephrine infusion decreases hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of norepinephrine infusion and ephedrine bolus against post-spinal hypotension in parturients.MethodsIn this double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly allocated to receive norepinephrine infusion (0.05 μg·kg-1·min-1) just before spinal anesthesia continuing for 30 min or ephedrine bolus (0.15 mg/kg) just before spinal anesthesia. A rescue bolus (5 μg norepinephrine for the norepinephrine group, and 5 mg ephedrine for the ephedrine group) was administered whenever hypotension occurred. Our primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 30 min of spinal anesthesia administration. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes 30 min after spinal block, and neonatal cerebral oxygenation 10 min after birth.ResultsIn total, 190 patients were enrolled; of these patients, 177 were included in the final analysis. Fewer patients suffered hypotension in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (29.5% vs. 44.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.95, P = 0.034). Moreover, the tachycardia frequency was lower in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11-0.44, P < 0.001), and patients suffered less nausea and vomiting (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11-0.70, P = 0.004). There was no difference in Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis between the two groups. However, neonatal cerebral regional saturations were significantly higher after birth in the norepinephrine group than in the ephedrine group (mean difference: 2.0%, 95% CI: 0.55%-3.45%, P = 0.008).ConclusionIn patients undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion compared to ephedrine bolus resulted in less hypotension and tachycardia, and exhibited potential neonatal benefits.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02542748; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02542748.

Project description:BackgroundThe optimal treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia is uncertain. A novel double intravenous vasopressor automated (DIVA) system reduces hypotension compared to standard care, and was subsequently modified to an advanced-DIVA (ADIVA) system. The primary objective was to compare ADIVA versus DIVA on incidence of hypotension (systolic BP (SBP) < 80% baseline).MethodsWe conducted a randomized-controlled trial in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. SBP and heart rate were measured continuously using a Nexfin monitor. ADIVA delivered 25 μg phenylephrine (heart rate > 60 beats.min-1) or 2 mg ephedrine (heart rate < 60 beats.min-1) at SBP 90 to 110% of baseline, 50 μg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine at SBP 80 to 90%, and 75 μg phenylephrine or 6 mg ephedrine at SBP < 80%. ADIVA calculated the trend of SBP; vasopressors were administered rapidly if SBP trended downward, or 30 s if SBP trended upward. In contrast, DIVA delivered 25 μg phenylephrine or 2 mg ephedrine at SBP 90 to 100% of baseline, and 50 μg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine at SBP < 90%. Boluses were followed by a 10-s lockout. Other outcomes included hypertension (SBP > 120% baseline), vasopressor consumption, clinical outcomes, and performance measures from spinal anesthesia to fetal delivery.ResultsWe analyzed 94 parturients (ADIVA: n = 46, DIVA: n = 48), with no difference in the incidence of hypotension between ADIVA (78.3%) and DIVA (83.3%, p = 0.677). ADIVA had significantly higher proportion of hypotensive SBP readings, lower phenylephrine consumption and higher umbilical arterial pH. There was no difference in hypertension, bradycardia, ephedrine consumption, intravenous fluid volume, nausea/vomiting, Apgar scores, and umbilical venous pH or lactate. ADIVA maintained SBP higher above baseline with greater fluctuation than DIVA.ConclusionADIVA was associated with a greater proportion of hypotensive SBP readings, reduced phenylephrine consumption, and increased umbilical arterial pH than DIVA. Further research is needed to determine the optimal method of vasopressor delivery in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.Trial registrationThis study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03620942) on 08/08/2018.

Dataset Information

Arterial Stiffness Predicts General Anesthesia-Induced Vasopressor-Resistant Hypotension in Patients Taking Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Interventions

Measurements and main results

Conclusion

Publications

Arterial Stiffness Predicts General Anesthesia-Induced Vasopressor-Resistant Hypotension in Patients Taking Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets