Dataset Information

Effect of ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To determine whether maintaining ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a different fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

Methods

A total of 413 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB were randomly assigned into three groups: 138 in the NoV group (received no mechanical ventilation during CPB), 138 in the LOV group (received a tidal volume (V_T) of 3-4 ml/kg of ideal body weight with the respiratory rate of 10-12 bpm, and the positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-8 cmH₂O during CPB; the FiO₂ was 30%), and 137 in the HOV group (received the same ventilation parameters settings as the LOV group while the FiO₂ was 80%).

Results

The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of PPCs during hospitalization. The composite incidence of PPCs did not significantly differ between the NoV (63%), LOV (49%) and HOV (57%) groups (P = 0.069). And there was also no difference regarding the incidence of PPCs between the non-ventilation (NoV) and ventilation (the combination of LOV and HOV) groups. The LOV group was observed a lower proportion of moderate and severe pulmonary complications (grade ≥ 3) than the NoV group (23.1% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Maintaining ventilation during CPB did not reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800015261. Prospectively registered 19 March 2018. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=25982.

SUBMITTER: Zhang MQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8556847 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Zhang Meng-Qiu MQ Liao Yu-Qi YQ Yu Hong H Li Xue-Fei XF Shi Wei W Jing Wei-Wei WW Wang Zai-Li ZL Xu Yi Y Yu Hai H

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 20211030 1

<h4>Background</h4>To determine whether maintaining ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a different fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 413 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB were randomly assigned into three groups: 138 in the NoV group (received no mechanical ventilation during CPB), 138 in the LOV group (received a tidal volume (V<sub>T ...[more]

PMID: 34717700

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCompared with historic ventilation strategies, modern lung-protective ventilation includes lower tidal volumes (VT), lower driving pressures, and application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The contributions of each component to an overall intraoperative protective ventilation strategy aimed at reducing postoperative pulmonary complications have neither been adequately resolved, nor comprehensively evaluated within an adult cardiac surgical population. The authors hypothesized that a bundled intraoperative protective ventilation strategy was independently associated with decreased odds of pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery.MethodsIn this observational cohort study, the authors reviewed nonemergent cardiac surgical procedures using cardiopulmonary bypass at a tertiary care academic medical center from 2006 to 2017. The authors tested associations between bundled or component intraoperative protective ventilation strategies (VT below 8 ml/kg ideal body weight, modified driving pressure [peak inspiratory pressure - PEEP] below 16 cm H2O, and PEEP greater than or equal to 5 cm H2O) and postoperative outcomes, adjusting for previously identified risk factors. The primary outcome was a composite pulmonary complication; secondary outcomes included individual pulmonary complications, postoperative mortality, as well as durations of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay.ResultsAmong 4,694 cases reviewed, 513 (10.9%) experienced pulmonary complications. After adjustment, an intraoperative lung-protective ventilation bundle was associated with decreased pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42-0.75). Via a sensitivity analysis, modified driving pressure below 16 cm H2O was independently associated with decreased pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.66), but VT below 8 ml/kg and PEEP greater than or equal to 5 cm H2O were not.ConclusionsThe authors identified an intraoperative lung-protective ventilation bundle as independently associated with pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery. The findings offer insight into components of protective ventilation associated with adverse outcomes and may serve as targets for future prospective interventional studies investigating the impact of specific protective ventilation strategies on postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Project description:BackgroundCardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers pulmonary injury. In this trial we assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of low frequency ventilation (LFV) during CPB in patients undergoing valvular surgery.Methods and resultsPatients with severe mitral or aortic valve disease were randomized to either LFV or usual care. Primary outcomes included release of generic inflammatory and vascular biomarkers and the lung-specific biomarker sRAGE (soluble receptor for advance glycation end products) up to 24 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function tests and 6-minute walking test up to 8 weeks postdischarge. Sixty-three patients were randomized (33 LFV versus 30 usual care). Mean age was 66.8 years and 30% were female. LFV was associated with changes of sRAGE (soluble receptor for advance glycation end products) levels (geometric mean ratio, 3.05; [95% CI, 1.13-8.24] 10 minutes post CPB, and 1.07 [95% CI, 0.64-1.79], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.55-1.27], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.42-1.07], and 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45-0.85] at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours post CPB respectively). No changes were observed for any of the generic biomarkers. Respiratory index soon after surgery (mean difference, -0.61 [95% CI, -1.24 to 0.015] 10 minutes post end of CPB), forced expiratory volume after 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio (0.050 [95% CI, 0.007-0.093] at 6 to 8 weeks pos-surgery), Forced vital capacity alone (95% CI, -0.191 L [-0.394 to 0.012]) and 6-minute walking test score at discharge (63.2 m [95% CI, 12.9-113.6]) were better preserved in the LFV group. No other differences were noted.ConclusionsThe use of LFV during CPB in patients undergoing valvular surgery was feasible and safe and was associated with changes in sRAGE levels along with better preserved lung function and walking performance. These observations warrant further investigation in larger future studies.RegistrationURL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique Identifier: ISRCTN75795633.

Project description:ObjectivesThe effect of one-lung ventilation (OLV) strategy based on low tidal volume (TV), application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) to reduce postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared with higher TV without PEEP and ARM strategy in adult patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy has not been well established.DesignMulticenter, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.SettingSixteen Italian hospitals.ParticipantsA total of 880 patients undergoing elective major lung resection.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive lower tidal volume (LTV group: 4 mL/kg predicted body weight, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and ARMs) or higher tidal volume (HTL group: 6 mL/kg predicted body weight, no PEEP, and no ARMs). After OLV, until extubation, both groups were ventilated using a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg and a PEEP value of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital ARDS. Secondary outcomes were the in-hospital rate of PPCs, major cardiovascular events, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital length of stay.Measurements and main resultsARDS occurred in 3 of 438 patients (0.7%, 95% CI 0.1-2.0) and in 1 of 442 patients (0.2%, 95% CI 0-1.4) in the LTV and HTV group, respectively (Risk ratio: 3.03 95% CI 0.32-29, p = 0.372). Pulmonary complications occurred in 125 of 438 patients (28.5%, 95% CI 24.5-32.9) and in 136 of 442 patients (30.8%, 95% CI 26.6-35.2) in the LTV and HTV group, respectively (risk ratio: 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.507). The incidence of major complications, in-hospital mortality, and unplanned ICU admission, ICU and in-hospital length of stay were comparable in both groups.ConclusionsIn conclusion, among adult patients undergoing elective lung resection, an OLV with lower tidal volume, PEEP 5 cmH2O, and ARMs and a higher tidal volume strategy resulted in low ARDS incidence and comparable postoperative complications, in-hospital length of stay, and mortality.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate whether a perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy prevents postoperative pulmonary complications after elective on-pump cardiac surgery.MethodsIn a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned patients planned for on-pump cardiac surgery to either a conventional ventilation strategy with no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and lower perioperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (2 cm H2O) or an open-lung ventilation strategy that included maintaining ventilation during CPB along with perioperative recruitment maneuvers and higher PEEP levels (8 cm H2O). All study patients were ventilated with low-tidal volumes before and after CPB (6 to 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight). The primary end point was a composite of pulmonary complications occurring within the first 7 postoperative days.ResultsAmong 493 randomized patients, 488 completed the study (mean age, 65.7 years; 360 (73.7%) men; 230 (47.1%) underwent isolated valve surgery). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 133 of 243 patients (54.7%) assigned to open-lung ventilation and in 145 of 245 patients (59.2%) assigned to conventional ventilation (p = 0.32). Open-lung ventilation did not significantly reduce the use of high-flow nasal oxygenotherapy (8.6% vs 9.4%; p = 0.77), non-invasive ventilation (13.2% vs 15.5%; p = 0.46) or new invasive mechanical ventilation (0.8% vs 2.4%, p = 0.28). Mean alive ICU-free days at postoperative day 7 was 4.4 ± 1.3 days in the open-lung group vs 4.3 ± 1.3 days in the conventional group (mean difference, 0.1 ± 0.1 day, p = 0.51). Extra-pulmonary complications and adverse events did not significantly differ between groups.ConclusionsA perioperative open-lung ventilation including ventilation during CPB does not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as compared with usual care. This finding does not support the use of such a strategy in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866578. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02866578.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsThe medical records of 214 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the occurrence of postoperative delirium, patients were divided into a delirium group (49 cases) and a non-delirium group (165 cases). Outcome measures, including clinical baseline data, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), preoperative Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), intraoperative blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, as well as postoperative MAP, were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential factors associated with post-operative delirium in patients.ResultsOf the included 214 patients, 49 patients experienced delirium, resulting in an incidence of 22.90%. The delirium group had significantly lower LVEF and significantly higher APACHE II scores compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative MAP, and intraoperative blood loss (all P>0.05). The delirium group experienced significantly longer length of ICU stay and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration as compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative MAP between the two groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) (OR: 6.755, 95% CI: 2.529-18.039, P<0.001), preoperative LVEF (OR: 6.886, 95% CI: 2.383-19.899, P<0.001), preoperative APACHE II score (OR: 7.788, 95% CI: 2.740-22.135, P<0.001), length of ICU stay (OR: 9.463, 95% CI: 3.563-25.135, P<0.001), and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration (OR: 9.744, 95% CI: 3.419-27.768, P<0.001) as independent factors influencing the occurrence of delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.ConclusionPostoperative delirium is a prevalent complication among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery include preoperative NYHA class III or IV, lower LVEF, higher APACHE II score, an extended length of stay in the ICU, and prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation duration.

Project description:BackgroundThere is no consensus on the ventilation management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and the anesthesiologists or the surgeons usually ventilate the lungs with different ventilation strategies or keep them static. Better outcomes are more likely to occur when the ventilation is administered during CPB according to the existing literatures. However, the use of high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is debatable in cardiac surgery. And the potential effects of strategies combining low tidal volume (VT) ventilation with different FiO2 during CPB on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are unclear.DesignThe VONTCPB trial is a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. We are going to recruit total 420 elective cardiac surgery patients with median sternotomy under CPB, who will be equally randomized into three different ventilation strategy groups: NoV, LOV and HOV. (1) The NoV group receives no mechanical ventilation during CPB; (2) the LOV group receives a low VT of 3-4 ml/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) with the respiratory rate (RR) of 10-12 acts/min, and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5-8 cmH2O during CPB; the FiO2 is 30%; (3) the HOV group receives a low VT of 3-4 ml/kg of IBW with the RR of 10-12 acts/min, and the PEEP of 5-8 cmH2O during CPB; the FiO2 is 80%. The primary endpoints are the incidence of the composite of PPCs and the PPCs score. The secondary endpoints refer to the incidence of the oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) < 300 mmHg at three time points (the moment arriving in the ICU, 6 and 12 h after arrival in the ICU), the surgical incision healing grade, the intubation time, the stay of ICU, the length of hospital stay, and mortality at 30 days after the surgery.DiscussionThe VONTCPB trial is the first study to assess the effects of strategies combining low tidal volume (VT) ventilation with different FiO2 during CPB on patients' outcomes.Trial registrationChiCTR1800015261 . Registered on 20 March 2018.

Dataset Information

Effect of ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Effect of ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets