Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Impact of COVID-19 on the association between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.


ABSTRACT: Managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requires frequent changes in mechanical ventilator respiratory settings to optimize arterial oxygenation assessed by arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and saturation (SaO2). Pulse oxymetry (SpO2) has been suggested as a non-invasive surrogate for arterial oxygenation however its accuracy in COVID-19 patients is unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of COVID-19 status on the association between SpO2 and arterial oxygenation. We prospectively included patients with ARDS and compared COVID-19 to non-COVID-19 patients, regarding SpO2 and concomitant arterial oxygenation (SaO2 and PaO2) measurements, and their association. Bias was defined as mean difference between SpO2 and SaO2 measurements. Occult hypoxemia was defined as a SpO2 ≥ 92% while concomitant SaO2 < 88%. Multiple linear regression models were built to account for confounders. We also assessed concordance between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial-induced changes in SpO2 and in arterial oxygenation. We included 55 patients, among them 26 (47%) with COVID-19. Overall, SpO2 and SaO2 measurements were correlated (r = 0.70; p < 0.0001), however less so in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001 vs. r = 0.84, p < 0.0001, p = 0.002 for intergroup comparison). Bias was + 1.1%, greater in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (2.0 vs. 0.3%; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, bias was associated with COVID-19 status (unstandardized β = 1.77, 95%CI = 0.38-3.15, p = 0.01), ethnic group and ARDS severity. Occult hypoxemia occurred in 5.5% of measurements (7.7% in COVID-19 patients vs. 3.4% in non-COVID-19 patients, p = 0.42). Concordance rate between PEEP trial-induced changes in SpO2 and SaO2 was 84%, however less so in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (69% vs. 97%, respectively). Similar results were observed for PaO2 regarding correlations, bias, and concordance with SpO2 changes. In patients with ARDS, SpO2 was associated with arterial oxygenation, but COVID-19 status significantly altered this association.

SUBMITTER: Nguyen LS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8795352 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Impact of COVID-19 on the association between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Nguyen Lee S LS   Helias Marion M   Raia Lisa L   Nicolas Estelle E   Jaubert Paul P   Benghanem Sarah S   Ait Hamou Zakaria Z   Dupland Pierre P   Charpentier Julien J   Pène Frédéric F   Cariou Alain A   Mira Jean-Paul JP   Chiche Jean-Daniel JD   Jozwiak Mathieu M  

Scientific reports 20220127 1


Managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requires frequent changes in mechanical ventilator respiratory settings to optimize arterial oxygenation assessed by arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>) and saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>). Pulse oxymetry (SpO<sub>2</sub>) has been suggested as a non-invasive surrogate for arterial oxygenation however its accuracy in COVID-19 patients is unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the influence of COVID-19 status o  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9423770 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9184974 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5091333 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5474185 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3219343 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10219298 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7946521 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6879165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6679149 | biostudies-literature