Phaco with ICL in situ in a case of high hyperopia.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To describe a unique method of biometric calculation and surgical technique of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation with an implantable collamer lens (ICL) in situ; for a high hyperope with post - ICL cataract.Observations
A patient with high hyperopia who underwent bilateral ICL implantation later developed cataract in both eyes. He underwent phacoaspiration of the cataract with ICL in situ and a standard power PCIOL implantation in the left eye. A unique method of PCIOL power calculation was later devised for the right eye by accounting for the residual refractive error of the eye and implanted by a similar surgical technique.Conclusion and importance
Following cataract surgery with the ICL in situ, the patient had a residual refractive error of +3.00D in the left eye however had a minimal residual refractive error in the right eye. A new surgical method of PCIOL implantation after cataract extraction with an ICL in situ as well as the biometric calculation for a PICOL to be implanted with an ICL in situ was devised.
SUBMITTER: Ganesh S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8810360 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Phaco with ICL in situ in a case of high hyperopia.
Ganesh Sri S Sriganesh Supriya Samak SS Sriganesh Sushmitha Samak SS Sriganesh Skanda Samak SS
American journal of ophthalmology case reports 20220126
<h4>Purpose</h4>To describe a unique method of biometric calculation and surgical technique of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation with an implantable collamer lens (ICL) in situ; for a high hyperope with post - ICL cataract.<h4>Observations</h4>A patient with high hyperopia who underwent bilateral ICL implantation later developed cataract in both eyes. He underwent phacoaspiration of the cataract with ICL in situ and a standard power PCIOL implantatio ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeTo report a case that had a progressive decrease in the visual acuity caused by a progressive increase in the hyperopia due to a flattening of the cornea.ObservationsA 50-year-old woman complained of decreased vision in both eyes. Her decimal best-corrected visual acuity was 1.2 in the right and 0.5 in the left eyes, and the refractive error (spherical equivalent) was +3.75 diopters (D) for the right eye and +6.5 D for the left eye. Slit-lamp examinations showed clear corneas but Descemet's folds and fine pigmentations and opacities were present beneath the corneal epithelium in both eyes. Analysis of the corneal shape by anterior segment optical coherence tomography showed that the corneas were flattened, and the corneal refractive power was decreased in both eyes. The large values of the higher-order aberration in the cornea and total eye displayed bilateral irregular astigmatism. She obtained good vision by wearing hard contact lenses but her refractive power continued to decrease for at least 1 year.Conclusionsand Importance: We report a rare case of progressive hyperopia and irregular astigmatism due to a flattening of the cornea. Folds were present in Descemet's membrane but the cornea was not edematous.
| S-EPMC5956658 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHyperopia, or hypermetropia (also known as long-sightedness or far-sightedness), is the condition where the unaccommodating eye brings parallel light to a focus behind the retina instead of on it. Hyperopia can be corrected with both non-surgical and surgical methods, among them photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser assisted In situ keratomileusis (LASIK). There is uncertainty as to whether hyperopic-PRK or hyperopic-LASIK is the better method.ObjectivesThe objectives of this review were to determine whether PRK or LASIK leads to more reliable, stable and safe results when correcting a hyperopic refractive error.Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1950 to February 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to February 2012), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to February 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 17 February 2012. When trials are included in the review we will search the reference lists of the studies included in the review for information about further trials. We will use the Science Citation Index to search for papers that cite any studies included in this review. We did not handsearch journals or conference proceedings specifically for this review.Selection criteriaWe planned to include only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PRK against LASIK for correction of hyperopia and then perform a sensitivity analysis of pre- and post-millennial trials since this is the mid-point in the history of both PRK and LASIK.Data collection and analysisWe did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review.Main resultsAs no studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, we discussed the results of non-randomised trials comparing hyperopic-PRK with hyperopic-LASIK.Authors' conclusionsNo robust, reliable conclusions could be reached, but the non-randomised trials reviewed appear to be in agreement that hyperopic-PRK and hyperopic-LASIK are of comparable efficacy. High quality, well-planned open RCTs are needed in order to obtain a robust clinical evidence base.
| S-EPMC7388917 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aimed to assess refractive astigmatism, in phaco-canaloplasty (PC) vs phaco-non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) in a randomized, prospective study within 24 months. Patients were randomized pre-operatively, 37 underwent PC and 38 PDS. The following data was collected: BCVA, IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, refraction with autokeratorefractometry. The assessment of astigmatism was simple arithmetic and vector analysis (calculations included cylinder with axis in form of centroids) and included double angle plots and cumulative refractive astigmatism graphs. Pre-operative mean BCVA in PC was 0.40 ± 0.43 and was comparable to BCVA in PDS 0.30 ± 0.32logMAR (P = 0.314). In the sixth month follow-up, mean BCVA showed no difference (P = 0.708) and was 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.05 ± 0.11, respectively. However, 2 years after the intervention mean BCVA was better in PC 0.05 ± 0.12 than in PDS 0.12 ± 0.23 and it was statistically significant (P = 0.039). Mean astigmatism in PC at baseline was 1.13 ± 0.73Dcyl, at 6 months it was 1.09 ± 0.61 and at 2 years 1.17 ± 0.51. In PDS at baseline 1.35 ± 0.91 at 6 months 1.24 ± 0.86 and at 2 years 1.24 ± 0.82. There were no differences between the groups in mean astigmatism throughout the study. Centroids (mean of a cylinder with axis) in PC were pre-operatively 0.79D@172˚ ± 1.10Dcyl, at 6 months 0.75D@166˚ ± 1.01 and at 24-months 0.64D@164˚ ± 1.11 and in PDS pre-operatively 0.28D@10˚ ± 1.63D at 6 months 0.26D@11˚ ± 1.5 and at 24-months 0.47D@20˚ ± 1.43. The direction of mean astigmatism was against the rule in all analyzed time points. The mean baseline IOP in PC was 19.4 ± 5.8 mmHg and 19.7 ± 5.4 mmHg in PDS(P = 0.639). From the 6-month IOP was lower in PC, at 24-months it was 13.8 ± 3.3 mmHg in PC and 15.1 ± 2.9 mmHg in PDS(P = 0.048). In both groups preoperatively patients used median(Me) of three antiglaucoma medications(P = 0.197), at 24-months in PC mean 0.5 ± 0.9 Me = 0.0 and 1.1 ± 1.2 Me = 1.0 in PDS(P = 0.058). Both surgeries in mid-term observation are safe and effective. They do not generate vision-threatening astigmatism and do not even change the preoperative direction of mean astigmatism. Refractive astigmatism is stable throughout the observation.
| S-EPMC9124182 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeMutations in the membrane-type frizzled-related protein (MFRP) gene have been identified in patients with pathologic high hyperopia associated with nanophthalmos or microphthalmia. This study is to test if a mutation in MFRP is responsible for physiologic high hyperopia.MethodsDNA was prepared from venous leukocytes of 51 patients with physiologic high hyperopia (refraction of spherical equivalent > or = +5.00 [diopters] D) and 96 controls (refraction of spherical equivalent between -0.50 D and +1.00 D). The coding regions and adjacent intronic sequence of MFRP were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and were then analyzed by cycle sequencing. Variations detected were further evaluated in normal controls and available family members by heteroduplex- single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis or sequencing.ResultsThe average spherical refractive error of patients was +8.41 D in the right eye (from +6.00 D to +16.5 D) and was +8.76 D in the left eye (from +6.00 D to +16.5 D). Five novel heterozygous variations in MFRP, c.55-14_55-13insGTAT, c.496C>G, c.664C>A, c.669G>A, and c.770G>A, were identified. Of these, c.664C>A (p.Pro222Thr) and c.669G>A (p.=) were not observed in the 96 normal controls. In addition, one known c.192C>G substitution and five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs883247, rs3814762, rs36015759, rs2510143, and rs35885438) were detected.ConclusionsSeveral novel variations in MFRP were detected in Chinese. Our results imply that MFRP is less likely to play a major role in physiologic high hyperopia.
| S-EPMC2629737 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo present a case of delayed recurrent hyphema following toric ICL implantation.ObservationsThis case reports a 24-year-old Asian female who presented with sudden decrease in vision in the right eye, accompanied by recurrent massive anterior chamber hemorrhage, six months after bilateral implantation of toric ICL with central holes for myopia correction. Despite initial conservative treatment with immobilization and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication at another hospital, the hyphema persisted. At our hospital, her corrected visual acuity (CDVA) in the right eye was counting fingers (CF) at 50 cm, with visible blood clots and hyphema in the anterior chamber, and an IOP of 40 mmHg. Ultrabiomicroscopy (UBM) indicated a large amount of hyphema in the anterior chamber. Initially, the patient was treated with a combination of three IOP-lowering medications: brimonidine eye drops, brinzolamide eye drops, and timolol eye drops, but the condition recurred. Two weeks later, we performed an anterior chamber hyphema evacuation and ICL removal surgery in the right eye. Postoperatively, the patient's IOP stabilized and her vision gradually recovered. One month after the surgery, a follow-up examination showed a CDVA of LogMAR 0.6 in the affected eye.Conclusion and importanceThis case report is essential for characterizing a rare and serious complication following toric ICL implantation, highlighting the importance of close monitoring and timely intervention.
| S-EPMC11420483 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We describe a catalyst-free 1,2-trans-dihalogenation of alkynes with an unprecedented substrate scope and exclusive regio- and stereoselectivity. This versatile dihalogenation system-a combination of NX1S electrophile and alkali metal halide (MX2) in acetic acid-is applicable for diverse categories of alkynes (electron-rich or poor alkynes, internal and terminal alkynes, or heteroatoms such as O-, N-, S-substituted alkynes). The hydrogen bonding donor solvent acetic acid is essential for the in-situ generation of X1X2 electrophile, including ICl, IBr, BrCl, I2, and Br2.
| S-EPMC7367077 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo investigate the morphological changes of concave iris in myopic patients after EVO implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation.MethodsEVO ICL candidates with posterior bowing iris were observed using ultrasound biometric microscopy (UBM) in this prospective nonrandomized observational study. Forty patients were enrolled, with 20 patients in the concave iris group and the other 20 patients in the control group. None of the patients underwent laser peripheral iridotomy. All patients received preoperative and postoperative examinations, which included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective manifest refraction and intraocular pressure. UBM was used to observe iris curvature (IC), irido-corneal angle (ICA), posterior chamber angle (PCA), iris-lens contact distance (ILCD), iris-zonule distance (IZD) and ciliary process length (CPL). Anterior chamber angle pigment was observed by gonioscopy. The preoperative and postoperative data were analyzed using SPSS.ResultsThe average follow-up period was 13.3 ± 5.3 months. The mean efficacy indices were 1.10 ± 0.13 and 1.07 ± 0.11 (P = 0.58), and the safety indices were 1.19 ± 0.09 and 1.18 ± 0.17 in the control group and the concave iris group (P = 0.93), respectively. The IOP postoperatively were 14.13 ± 2.02 mmHg and 14.69 ± 1.59 mmHg in control and concave iris groups (P = 0.37). Preoperatively, the concave iris group was presented with greater IC (P < 0.0001), longer ILCD (P < 0.0001), wider ICA (P = 0.004), narrower PCA (P = 0.01), and shorter IZD (P = 0.03) than the control group. In the concave iris group, IC, ILCD and ICA were significantly decreased after ICL implantation (P < 0.0001), while PCA and IZD were significantly increased (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Postoperative IC, ILCD, ICA, PCA and IZD were not statistically different between groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in pigment deposition grades between the two groups (P = 0.37).ConclusionAfter EVO ICL implantation, the morphology of concave iris was significantly improved, which may reduce the risk of intraocular pigment dissemination caused by iris concavity. The concave iris has no impact on the safety of EVO ICL surgery during the follow-up.
| S-EPMC10068169 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceUncertainty currently exists about whether the same genetic variants are associated with susceptibility to low myopia (LM) and high myopia (HM) and to myopia and hyperopia. Addressing this question is fundamental to understanding the genetics of refractive error and has clinical relevance for genotype-based prediction of children at risk for HM and for identification of new therapeutic targets.ObjectiveTo assess whether a common set of genetic variants are associated with susceptibility to HM, LM, and hyperopia.Design, setting, and participantsThis genetic association study assessed unrelated UK Biobank participants 40 to 69 years of age of European and Asian ancestry. Participants 40 to 69 years of age living in the United Kingdom were recruited from January 1, 2006, to October 31, 2010. Of the total sample of 502 682 participants, 117 279 (23.3%) underwent an ophthalmic assessment. Data analysis was performed from December 12, 2019, to June 23, 2020.ExposuresFour refractive error groups were defined: HM, -6.00 diopters (D) or less; LM, -3.00 to -1.00 D; hyperopia, +2.00 D or greater; and emmetropia, 0.00 to +1.00 D. Four genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses were performed in participants of European ancestry: (1) HM vs emmetropia, (2) LM vs emmetropia, (3) hyperopia vs emmetropia, and (4) LM vs hyperopia. Polygenic risk scores were generated from GWAS summary statistics, yielding 4 sets of polygenic risk scores. Performance was assessed in independent replication samples of European and Asian ancestry.Main outcomes and measuresOdds ratios (ORs) of polygenic risk scores in replication samples.ResultsA total of 51 841 unrelated individuals of European ancestry and 2165 unrelated individuals of Asian ancestry were assigned to a specific refractive error group and included in our analyses. Polygenic risk scores derived from all 4 GWAS analyses were predictive of all categories of refractive error in both European and Asian replication samples. For example, the polygenic risk score derived from the HM vs emmetropia GWAS was predictive in the European sample of HM vs emmetropia (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.41-1.77; P = 1.54 × 10-15) as well as LM vs emmetropia (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23; P = 8.14 × 10-5), hyperopia vs emmetropia (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; P = 4.18 × 10-7), and LM vs hyperopia (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.33-1.59; P = 1.43 × 10-16).Conclusions and relevanceGenetic risk variants were shared across HM, LM, and hyperopia and across European and Asian samples. Individuals with HM inherited a higher number of variants from among the same set of myopia-predisposing alleles and not different risk alleles compared with individuals with LM. These findings suggest that treatment interventions targeting common genetic risk variants associated with refractive error could be effective against both LM and HM.
| S-EPMC8033508 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This report describes two maneuvers in different steps of phaco surgery in a case with hard cataract, which provide debulking of the central dense nucleus and prevents posterior capsule rupture (PCR). In the current case, clear corneal incisions were created, and anterior chamber was filled with ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD). Anterior capsule was punctured, and capsulorhexis was completed. Nucleus was cracked into two halves following vertical groove formation. Core nucleus was hollowed sideward bilaterally in the capsular bag. Nuclear halves were removed from capsular bag, and each one was pushed to one side on the iris plane. Capsular bag was inflated with OVD, and intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted. Nuclear halves were removed in confidence. The presented maneuvers initially reduce dense nucleus load in the safe zone and allow surgeon to use IOL as a barrier to protect floppy posterior capsule from early steps of the surgery.
| S-EPMC6369501 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Relative anterior microphthalmos, nanophthalmos and high-grade hyperopia are small eyes with different characteristic morphological relationships between the anterior segment and axis length. This article discusses the intraoperative challenges and surgical approaches to solutions for cataract operations in patients with one of the three named morphological alterations. Additionally, the article addresses possible comorbidities including glaucoma and preoperative planning.
| S-EPMC8763755 | biostudies-literature