Immunologic response in bacterial sepsis is different from that in COVID-19 sepsis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Perschinka F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8932087 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Immunologic response in bacterial sepsis is different from that in COVID-19 sepsis.
Perschinka Fabian F Mayerhöfer Timo T Lehner Georg Franz GF Hasslacher Julia J Klein Sebastian Johann SJ Joannidis Michael M
Infection 20220318 4
Similar Datasets
Project description:Although some studies reported the comprehensive mRNA expression analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using blood samples to understand its pathogenesis, the characteristics of RNA expression in COVID-19 and sepsis have not been compared. We compared the transcriptome expression of whole blood samples from patients with COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and patients with sepsis caused by other bacteria who entered the intensive care unit to clarify the COVID-19-specific RNA expression and understand its pathogenesis. Transcriptomes related to mitochondria were upregulated in COVID-19, whereas those related to neutrophils were upregulated in sepsis. However, the transcriptomes related to neutrophils were upregulated in both COVID-19 and sepsis compared to in healthy controls, whereas the mitochondrial transcriptomes were upregulated in COVID-19 and downregulated in sepsis compared to in healthy controls. Moreover, sepsis showed sub-optimal intrinsic apoptotic features compared with COVID-19. The transcriptome expression of COVID-19 has been examined in vitro but has not been widely validated using human specimens. This study improves the understanding of the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and can contribute to the development of treatments.
2022-11-29 | GSE199816 | GEO
Project description:In this prospective observational cohort study, we found transcriptional evidence that persistent immune dysfunction was associated with 28-day mortality in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 septic patients. COVID-19 patients had an early antiviral response but became indistinguishable on a gene expression level from non-COVID-19 sepsis patients a week later. Early treatment of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 sepsis ICU patients should focus on pathogen control, but both patient groups also require novel immunomodulatory treatments, particularly later during ICU hospitalization, independent of admission diagnosis. Some T1 samples were uploaded in GSE185263 and were not re-uploaded in this series.
2023-03-24 | GSE222393 | GEO
Project description:Sepsis is an extreme inflammatory response to infection that occurs in the bloodstream and causes damage throughout the body. Glycosylation is known to play a role in immunity and inflammation, but the role of glycans in sepsis is not well-defined. Herein, we profiled the serum glycomes of experimental mouse sepsis models to identify changes induced by 4 different clinical bacterial pathogens (Gram-positive: Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-negative: Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium) using our lectin microarray technology. We observed global shifts in the blood sera glycome that were conserved across all four species, regardless of whether they were Gram positive or negative. Bisecting GlcNAc was decreased upon sepsis and a strong increase in core 1/3 O-glycans was observed. Lectin blot analysis revealed a high molecular weight protein induced in sepsis by all four bacteria as the major cause of the core 1/3 O-glycan shift. Analysis of this band by mass spectrometry identified interalpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chains (ITIHs) and fibronectin, both of which are associated with human sepsis. Shifts in the glycosylation of these proteins were observed. Overall, our work points toward a common mechanism for bacterially induced sepsis, marked by conserved changes in the glycome.
| S-EPMC9112329 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To profile the landscape of circRNAs in neutrophils of COVID-19 and sepsis patients, we conducted comprehensive expression profiling analysis in a training cohort.
2025-08-24 | GSE208092 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundLipids may influence cellular penetrance by viral pathogens and the immune response that they evoke. We deeply phenotyped the lipidomic response to SARs-CoV-2 and compared that with infection with other pathogens in patients admitted with acute respiratory distress syndrome to an intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsMass spectrometry was used to characterise lipids and relate them to proteins, peripheral cell immunotypes and disease severity.ResultsCirculating phospholipases (sPLA2, cPLA2 (PLA2G4A) and PLA2G2D) were elevated on admission in all ICU groups. Cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase and epoxygenase products of arachidonic acid (AA) were elevated in all ICU groups compared with controls. sPLA2 predicted severity in COVID-19 and correlated with TxA2, LTE4 and the isoprostane, iPF2α-III, while PLA2G2D correlated with LTE4. The elevation in PGD2, like PGI2 and 12-HETE, exhibited relative specificity for COVID-19 and correlated with sPLA2 and the interleukin-13 receptor to drive lymphopenia, a marker of disease severity. Pro-inflammatory eicosanoids remained correlated with severity in COVID-19 28 days after admission. Amongst non-COVID ICU patients, elevations in 5- and 15-HETE and 9- and 13-HODE reflected viral rather than bacterial disease. Linoleic acid (LA) binds directly to SARS-CoV-2 and both LA and its di-HOME products reflected disease severity in COVID-19. In healthy marines, these lipids rose with seroconversion. Eicosanoids linked variably to the peripheral cellular immune response. PGE2, TxA2 and LTE4 correlated with T cell activation, as did PGD2 with non-B non-T cell activation. In COVID-19, LPS stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell PGF2α correlated with memory T cells, dendritic and NK cells while LA and DiHOMEs correlated with exhausted T cells. Three high abundance lipids - ChoE 18:3, LPC-O-16:0 and PC-O-30:0 - were altered specifically in COVID. LPC-O-16:0 was strongly correlated with T helper follicular cell activation and all three negatively correlated with multi-omic inflammatory pathways and disease severity.ConclusionsA broad based lipidomic storm is a predictor of poor prognosis in ARDS. Alterations in sPLA2, PGD2 and 12-HETE and the high abundance lipids, ChoE 18:3, LPC-O-16:0 and PC-O-30:0 exhibit relative specificity for COVID-19 amongst such patients and correlate with the inflammatory response to link to disease severity.
| S-EPMC10637636 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Critically ill COVID-19 patients start developing single respiratory organ failure that often evolves into multiorgan failure. Understanding the immune mechanisms in severe forms of an infectious disease (either critical COVID-19 or bacterial septic shock) would help to achieve a better understanding of the patient's clinical trajectories and the success of potential therapies. We hypothesized that a dysregulated immune response manifested by the abnormal activation of innate and adaptive immunity might be present depending on the severity of the clinical presentation in both COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis. We found that critically ill COVID-19 patients demonstrated a different clinical endotype that resulted in an inflammatory dysregulation in mild forms of the disease. Mild cases (COVID-19 and bacterial non severe sepsis) showed significant differences in the expression levels of CD8 naïve T cells, CD4 naïve T cells, and CD4 memory T cells. On the other hand, in the severe forms of infection (critical COVID-19 and bacterial septic shock), patients shared immune patterns with upregulated single-cell transcriptome sequencing at the following levels: B cells, monocyte classical, CD4 and CD8 naïve T cells, and natural killers. In conclusion, we identified significant gene expression differences according to the etiology of the infection (COVID-19 or bacterial sepsis) in the mild forms; however, in the severe forms (critical COVID-19 and bacterial septic shock), patients tended to share some of the same immune profiles related to adaptive and innate immune response. Severe forms of the infections were similar independent of the etiology. Our findings might promote the implementation of co-adjuvant therapies and interventions to avoid the development of severe forms of disease that are associated with high mortality rates worldwide.
| S-EPMC10045101 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immunosuppression caused by cancer itself and cytotoxic treatment may pose a challenge to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with hematological malignancies. Here, we use multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC) to analyze immune profiles in peripheral blood samples of 515 COVID-19 patients at presentation. In 14 cases, deep immunophenotyping of B- and T-cells was performed and six myeloid- and dendritic-cell subsets were FACSorted for transcriptome analysis using RNAseq. Of the 515 patients, 15 and 10 had solid and hematological tumors, respectively. Those with hematological cancer showed significantly higher rates of intensive care (50%) and death (30%) from COVID-19 vs cases with solid cancer and no tumor. Patients with hematological malignancies displayed altered immune profiles with significantly decreased absolute numbers of several subsets of myeloid and lymphoid cells. Myeloid- and dendritic-cell types from hematological cases showed differentially expression of genes coding transcription factors, toll-like receptors and proinflammatory interleukin receptors implicated in response to coronaviruses. The relative distribution of the B-cell compartment was notoriously altered in COVID-19 patients with hematological cancer, and progressively lower numbers of B- and T-cell subsets were observed in deceased cases. Altogether, our results suggest an association between impaired immune responses and poorer outcomes in COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies.
2020-12-31 | GSE153610 | GEO
Project description:Vaccination against 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) can reduce disease incidence and severity. Dialysis patients demonstrate a delayed immunologic response to vaccines. We determined factors affecting the immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in haemodialysis patients. All patients within a Swedish haemodialysis network, vaccinated with two doses of COVID-19 vaccine 2-8 weeks before inclusion, were eligible for this cross-sectional study. Severe adult respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein antibody levels were determined by EliA SARS-CoV-2-Sp1 IgG test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia AB) and related to clinical and demographic parameters. Eighty-nine patients were included. Patients were vaccinated with two doses of Comirnaty (BNT162b2, 73%) or Spikevax (mRNA-1273, 23,6%). Three patients received combinations of different vaccines. Response rate (antibody titres >7 U/mL) was 89.9%, while 39.3% developed high antibody titres (>204 U/mL), 47 (43-50) days after the second dose. A previous COVID-19 infection associated with higher antibody titres (median (25th-75th percentile) 1558.5 (814.5-3,763.8) U/mL vs 87 (26-268) U/mL, P = .002), while time between vaccine doses did not differ between groups (P = .7). Increasing SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres were independently associated with increasing time between vaccine doses (B 0.241, P = .02), decreasing serum calcium levels (B -0.233, P = .007) and previous COVID-19 (B 1.078, P < .001). In conclusion, a longer interval between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, lower calcium and a previous COVID-19 infection were independently associated with a stronger immunologic vaccination response in haemodialysis patients. While the response rate was good, only a minority developed high antibody titres, 47 (43-50) days after the second vaccine dose.
| S-EPMC9115353 | biostudies-literature
Project description:SARS-CoV-2 caused the pandemic situation experienced since the beginning of 2020, and many countries faced the rapid spread and severe form of the disease. Mechanisms of interaction between the virus and the host were observed during acute phase, but few data are available when related to immunity dynamics in convalescents. We conducted a longitudinal study, with 51 healthy donors and 62 COVID-19 convalescent patients, which these had a 2-month follow-up after symptoms recovery. Venous blood sample was obtained from all participants to measure blood count, subpopulations of monocytes, lymphocytes, natural killer cells and dendritic cells. Serum was used to measure cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, anti-N IgG and anti-S IgG/IgM antibodies. Statistic was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test, and linear regression with days post symptoms and antibody titers. All analysis had confidence interval of 95%. Less than 35% of convalescents were anti-S IgM+, while more than 80% were IgG+ in D30. Anti-N IgG decreased along time, with loss of seroreactivity of 13%. Eosinophil count played a distinct role on both antibodies during all study, and the convalescence was orchestrated by higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and IL-15, but initial stages were marked by increase in myeloid DCs, B1 lymphocytes, inflammatory and patrolling monocytes, G-CSF and IL-2. Later convalescence seemed to change to cytotoxicity mediated by T lymphocytes, plasmacytoid DCs, VEGF, IL-9 and CXCL10. Anti-S IgG antibodies showed the longest perseverance and may be a better option for diagnosis. The inflammatory pattern is yet present on initial stage of convalescence, but quickly shifts to a reparative dynamic. Meanwhile eosinophils seem to play a role on anti-N levels in convalescence, although may not be the major causative agent. We must highlight the importance of immunological markers on acute clinical outcomes, but their comprehension to potentialize adaptive system must be explored to improve immunizations and further preventive policies.
| S-EPMC11384766 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) varies significantly among persons of similar age and is higher in males. Age-independent, sex-biased differences in susceptibility to severe COVID-19 may be ascribable to deficits in a sexually dimorphic protective attribute that we termed immunologic resilience (IR).ObjectiveWe sought to examine whether deficits in IR that antedate or are induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection independently predict COVID-19 mortality.MethodsIR levels were quantified with 2 novel metrics: immune health grades (IHG-I [best] to IHG-IV) to gauge CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell count equilibrium, and blood gene expression signatures. IR metrics were examined in a prospective COVID-19 cohort (n = 522); primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Associations of IR metrics with outcomes in non-COVID-19 cohorts (n = 13,461) provided the framework for linking pre-COVID-19 IR status to IR during COVID-19, as well as to COVID-19 outcomes.ResultsIHG-I, tracking high-grade equilibrium between CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell counts, was the most common grade (73%) among healthy adults, particularly in females. SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with underrepresentation of IHG-I (21%) versus overrepresentation (77%) of IHG-II or IHG-IV, especially in males versus females (P < .01). Presentation with IHG-I was associated with 88% lower mortality, after controlling for age and sex; reduced risk of hospitalization and respiratory failure; lower plasma IL-6 levels; rapid clearance of nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 burden; and gene expression signatures correlating with survival that signify immunocompetence and controlled inflammation. In non-COVID-19 cohorts, IR-preserving metrics were associated with resistance to progressive influenza or HIV infection, as well as lower 9-year mortality in the Framingham Heart Study, especially in females.ConclusionsPreservation of immunocompetence with controlled inflammation during antigenic challenges is a hallmark of IR and associates with longevity and AIDS resistance. Independent of age, a male-biased proclivity to degrade IR before and/or during SARS-CoV-2 infection predisposes to severe COVID-19.
| S-EPMC8425719 | biostudies-literature