Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension.Methods
In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software.Results
Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively.Conclusions
Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.
SUBMITTER: Cheng YB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8997688 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Cheng Yi-Bang YB Thijs Lutgarde L Aparicio Lucas S LS Huang Qi-Fang QF Wei Fang-Fei FF Yu Yu-Ling YL Barochiner Jessica J Sheng Chang-Sheng CS Yang Wen-Yi WY Niiranen Teemu J TJ Boggia José J Zhang Zhen-Yu ZY Stolarz-Skrzypek Katarzyna K Gilis-Malinowska Natasza N Tikhonoff Valérie V Wojciechowska Wiktoria W Casiglia Edoardo E Narkiewicz Krzysztof K Filipovský Jan J Kawecka-Jaszcz Kalina K Wang Ji-Guang JG Li Yan Y Staessen Jan A JA
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) 20220304 5
<h4>Background</h4>Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension.<h4>Methods</h4>In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined an ...[more]