Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations.Methods
A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Out of 1,389 screened abstracts, 22 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 5 studies were included (N = 18,047 embryos). Prolonged cryo-storage was defined as > 12 months (N = 3389 embryos). Subgroup analysis was performed for untested vitrified cleavage stage embryos (N = 1739 embryos) and for untested and euploid vitrified blastocysts (N = 13,596 and 2712 embryos, respectively).Results
Survival rate, miscarriage, live birth and major malformation rates were all similar in the two groups.Conclusion
These data further support the safety of long-term cryo-storage of human embryos beyond 12 months. This is reassuring for good prognosis patients with surplus embryos, couples seeking a second child from supernumerary embryos and women postponing the transfer for clinical or personal reasons.
SUBMITTER: Canosa S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9050987 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Canosa S S Cimadomo D D Conforti A A Maggiulli R R Giancani A A Tallarita A A Golia F F Fabozzi G G Vaiarelli A A Gennarelli G G Revelli A A Bongioanni F F Alviggi C C Ubaldi F M FM Rienzi L L
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 20220204 4
<h4>Purpose</h4>Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and me ...[more]