Post-Transplant Hypotension in Kidney Recipients-Vasopressin to the Rescue?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bajpai D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9174034 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Post-Transplant Hypotension in Kidney Recipients-Vasopressin to the Rescue?
Bajpai Divya D Muthukumar Thangamani T
Kidney international reports 20220507 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionHypotension after deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) is a risk factor for delayed graft function (DGF) and poor graft survival (GS). We hypothesize that vasopressin use in hypotensive DDKT recipients (DDKTRs) to increase blood pressure (BP) reduces DGF rates and is safe without increasing mortality.MethodsGroup with vasopressin "study group" (n = 45) was defined as DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 who required vasopressin for hypotension systolic BP (SBP) <120 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) <60 mm Hg. DDKTRs with no-vasopressin "comparison group" (n = 90) were propensity score-matched DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 without vasopressin use. Primary outcomes were GS, creatinine and allograft biopsy rate at 1 year, DGF rate, and death during transplant hospitalization.ResultsVasopressin group had lower mean maximum and minimum SBP and DBP in the operating room (OR). Median vasopressin start time post-DDKT was 2 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1-6), and duration of use was 42 hours (IQR 24-63). DGF, creatinine at 1 year, and allograft biopsy rates were comparable. No deaths occurred during transplant hospitalization. Multivariable analysis did not find an effect of vasopressin use on GS.ConclusionTreatment of hypotensive DDKTRs with vasopressin is safe and facilitated similar graft function and survival with that of nonhypotensive patients. In the absence of a randomized control trial, our study supports the safety of vasopressin therapy to prevent the adverse effects of hypotension.
| S-EPMC9174042 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Objectives: Kidney transplant recipients represent a unique population with metabolic abnormalities, altered nutritional and immune status, as well as an imbalanced regulation of adipocytokine metabolism. Leptin is a hormonally active protein mainly produced by fat tissue that modulates appetite, satiety, and influences growth, energy, and bone metabolism. There has been great interest in the role of this hormone in chronic kidney disease-related protein energy wasting; thus, a positive leptin correlation with body mass index and fat mass was confirmed. This study was designed to determine the association of pre and post-kidney transplant leptin concentration with nutritional status and body composition. Materials and Methods: We studied 65 kidney transplant recipients. Nutritional status was evaluated before kidney transplantation and 6 months later using three different malnutrition screening tools (Subjective Global Assessment Scale (SGA), Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI)), anthropometric measurements, and body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)). Demographic profile, serum leptin levels, and other biochemical nutritional markers were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with R software. Results: Median age of the studied patients was 45 years, 42% were females, and 12% had diabetes. Leptin change was associated with body weight (p < 0.001), waist circumference (p < 0.001), fat mass (p < 0.001) and body fat percentage (p < 0.001), decrease in parathyroid hormone (PTH) (p < 0.001) transferrin (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.010), and residual renal function (p = 0.039), but not dependent on dialysis vintage, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), or delayed graft function at any time during the study. After adjustment for age and sex, body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), fat mass (p < 0.001), and body fat percentage (p < 0.001) were independent variables significantly associated with post-transplant leptin change. Lower leptin values were found both before and after kidney transplantation in the SGA B group. GNRI as a nutritional status tool was strongly positively related to changes in leptin within the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions: Kidney transplant recipients experience change in leptin concentration mainly due to an increase in fat mass and loss of muscle mass. GNRI score as compared to SGA or MIS score identifies patients in whom leptin concentration is increasing alongside an accumulation of fat and decreasing muscle mass. Leptin concentration evaluation in combination with BIA, handgrip strength measurement, and GNRI assessment are tools of importance in defining nutrition status in the early post-kidney transplant period.
| S-EPMC8399685 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2024-10-15 | GSE250536 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundPost-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a devastating complication of immunosuppressive treatment in both solid organ transplantations (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection precedes PTLD in 90% of patients. Rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, depletes B-lymphocytes, which are the ultimate reservoir for EBV. Although rituximab therapy is commonly used as a preventive measure for PTLD in high-risk HSCT, it is not established in SOT.MethodsPediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTR) underwent routine EBV-PCR surveillance. Patients with increasing viral loads, despite immunosuppressive dose reduction, were managed with preventive rituximab therapy.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2023, we identified eight episodes of asymptomatic EBV-PCR-positive blood tests in seven out of 65 PKTR (11%) under our care. EBV DNAemia emerged 120-720 days post-transplantation. Five of seven patients with EBV DNAemia (71%) were EBV-seronegative prior to transplantation. All five patients did not respond to MMF dose reduction and were therefore treated with preventive rituximab therapy. Following this treatment, EBV PCR clearance was observed in all patients with only minimal complications.ConclusionsPKTR who are EBV-naïve prior to transplantation are expected to have a higher prevalence of EBV DNAemia. We found that PKTR who were EBV seronegative prior to transplantation were less likely to achieve EBV clearance in response to immunosuppression dose reduction. We suggest that rituximab therapy in PKTR may be safe and effective in EBV clearance and PTLD prevention.
| S-EPMC11747069 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDe novo post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication after kidney transplant (KT). Most recent studies are single center with various approaches to outcome ascertainment.MethodsIn a multicenter longitudinal cohort of 632 nondiabetic adult kidney recipients transplanted in 2010-2013, we ascertained outcomes through detailed chart review at 13 centers. We hypothesized that donor characteristics, such as sex, HCV infection, and kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and recipient characteristics, such as age, race, BMI, and increased HLA mismatches, would affect the development of PTDM among KT recipients. We defined PTDM as hemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%, pharmacological treatment for diabetes, or documentation of diabetes in electronic medical records. We assessed PTDM risk factors and evaluated for an independent time-updated association between PTDM and graft failure using regression.ResultsMean recipient age was 52±14 years, 59% were male, 49% were Black. Cumulative PTDM incidence 5 years post-KT was 29% (186). Independent baseline PTDM risk factors included older recipient age (P<0.001) and higher BMI (P=0.006). PTDM was not associated with all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.10; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.55), death-censored graft failure (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.37), or death (aHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.05) at median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range, 4.0-6.9) years post-KT. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression were not different between patients who did and did not develop PTDM.ConclusionsPTDM occurred commonly, and higher baseline BMI was associated with PTDM. PTDM was not associated with graft failure or mortality during the 6-year follow-up, perhaps due to the short follow-up time.
| S-EPMC8676388 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10780128 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDue to the mechanisms of action of conventional catecholamine vasopressors, there is increased risk of renal allograft injury and adverse events in transplant recipients with fluid-refractory distributive shock during the perioperative period. As such, mechanistically alternative vasopressors like angiotensin II (ATII) may avoid these complications, but there is an absence of data supporting use in this population.MethodsThis was a single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 4 study conducted as a 1-year pilot of 20 adult renal transplant recipients receiving ATII as their first continuous infusion vasopressor in the perioperative period. The study aim was to systematically assess the safety and hemodynamic effects of ATII. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse events. Hemodynamic effect was assessed by the achievement of per protocol hemodynamic goals (i.e., SBP ≥120 mmHg) and the need for adjunct vasopressors.ResultsMost cases involved deceased donors (70%), with a corresponding mean (SD) cold ischemia time of 14.7 (8.6) h. Over a surgery duration of 5.3 (1.2) h, subjects received 3.2 (2.0) L of total volume resuscitation prior to ATII initiation. No adverse events were directly related to ATII administration. Throughout this period, ATII was utilized for a median of 1.0 (IQR, 1.5) h intraoperatively (N = 7), 26.5 (IQR, 84.8) h postoperatively (N = 4), and 63.8 (IQR, 57.8) h in subjects who required ATII both intra- and postoperatively (N = 9). Only one of the 20 patients needed adjunct continuous infusion vasopressors in addition to ATII.ConclusionsBased on the observations of this pilot study, ATII is a safe and effective vasopressor option for renal transplant recipients requiring perioperative hypotension reversal.
| S-EPMC9787019 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is well known that pre-transplant B cell activating factor (BAFF) levels are associated with the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies and antibody mediated rejection post-transplant. However, the clinical significance of BAFF values at allograft rejection has not been determined. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of pre-transplant BAFF level as well as post-transplant BAFF levels measured when indication biopsy was done. We checked for anti-HLA antibodies in 115 kidney transplant recipients who required allograft biopsy due to an increase in serum creatinine. With the same serum specimen, we measured BAFF levels, and in 78 of these patients, pre-transplant BAFF and anti-HLA antibody levels were detected as well. Patients in each group were divided into tertiles according to BAFF levels. We investigated the relationship between BAFF levels and the occurrence of anti-HLA antibodies. Pre-transplant BAFF levels showed significant association with pre-transplant sensitization, and also with early rejection (Tertile 3, 26.9% vs. Tertile 1, 11.5%; P<0.05). Post-transplant BAFF levels showed significant association with pre-transplant sensitization, but did not show association with anti-HLA antibodies and positive donor-specific antibodies at the time of biopsy. We did not find any association between post-transplant BAFF levels and allograft biopsy results, Banff scores and microvascular inflammation scores. In conclusion, pre-transplant BAFF levels are associated with pre-transplant sensitization and are useful in predicting allograft rejection. But post-transplant BAFF levels measured at the time of indication biopsy are not associated with the appearance of de novo HLA-DSA, allograft rejection, biopsy findings and other allograft outcomes.
| S-EPMC5025051 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Delayed graft function (DGF) complicates kidney allograft outcomes in the immediate post-transplantation period. We hypothesized that in hemodialysis patients more severe anemia, iron deficiency, the requirement for higher doses of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA), or blood transfusions prior to transplantation are associated with higher risk of DGF.Linking five-yr hemodialysis patient data of a large dialysis organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 11 836 hemodialysis patients. Using logistic regression analyses we examined the association between pre-transplant parameters and post-transplant DGF.Patients were 49 ± 14 (mean ± SD) yr old and included 38% women, 27% blacks, and 26% diabetics. After adjusting for relevant covariates, pre-transplant blood transfusion was associated with 33% higher DGF risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.48); and each 5000 U/wk increase of pre-transplant ESA dose with 5% higher DGF (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09). Compared to pre-transplant blood hemoglobin of 12-12.99 g/dL, there was 25% higher risk of DGF with blood hemoglobin 10-10.99 g/dL (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01-1.55), whereas blood hemoglobin ?13 g/dL exhibited 15% higher risk of DGF (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34).Pre-transplant blood transfusion, higher ESA dose, and either high or low blood hemoglobin but not iron markers are associated with higher risk of DGF.
| S-EPMC4571494 | biostudies-literature