Dataset Information

Ablation and antiarrhythmic drug effects on PITX2 ^+/- deficient atrial fibrillation: A computational modeling study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heritable disease, and the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene is highly associated with AF. We explored the differences in the circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), which is the cornerstone procedure for AF catheter ablation, additional high dominant frequency (DF) site ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) effects according to the patient genotype (wild-type and PITX2 ^+/- deficient) using computational modeling.

Methods

We included 25 patients with AF (68% men, 59.8 ± 9.8 years of age, 32% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation to develop a realistic computational AF model. The ion currents for baseline AF and the amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide AADs according to the patient genotype (wild type and PITX2 ^+/- deficient) were defined by relevant publications. We tested the virtual CPVI (V-CPVI) with and without DF ablation (±DFA) and three virtual AADs (V-AADs, amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide) and evaluated the AF defragmentation rates (AF termination or changes to regular atrial tachycardia (AT), DF, and maximal slope of the action potential duration restitution curves (Smax), which indicates the vulnerability of wave-breaks.

Results

At the baseline AF, mean DF (p = 0.003), and Smax (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in PITX2 ^+/- deficient patients than wild-type patients. In the overall AF episodes, V-CPVI (±DFA) resulted in a higher AF defragmentation relative to V-AADs (65 vs. 42%, p < 0.001) without changing the DF or Smax. Although a PITX2 ^+/- deficiency did not affect the AF defragmentation rate after the V-CPVI (±DFA), V-AADs had a higher AF defragmentation rate (p = 0.014), lower DF (p < 0.001), and lower Smax (p = 0.001) in PITX2 ^+/- deficient AF than in wild-type patients. In the clinical setting, the PITX2 ^+/- genetic risk score did not affect the AF ablation rhythm outcome (Log-rank p = 0.273).

Conclusion

Consistent with previous clinical studies, the V-CPVI had effective anti-AF effects regardless of the PITX2 genotype, whereas V-AADs exhibited more significant defragmentation or wave-dynamic change in the PITX2 ^+/- deficient patients.

SUBMITTER: Jin Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9343754 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ablation and antiarrhythmic drug effects on PITX2 +/- deficient atrial fibrillation: A computational modeling study.

Jin Ze Z Hwang Inseok I Lim Byounghyun B Kwon Oh-Seok OS Park Je-Wook JW Yu Hee-Tae HT Kim Tae-Hoon TH Joung Boyoung B Lee Moon-Hyoung MH Pak Hui-Nam HN

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 20220719

<h4>Introduction</h4>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heritable disease, and the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene is highly associated with AF. We explored the differences in the circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), which is the cornerstone procedure for AF catheter ablation, additional high dominant frequency (DF) site ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) effects according to the patient genotype (wild-type and PITX2 +/- deficient) ...[more]

PMID: 35928934

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsAlthough several studies have proved that repeat catheter ablation is beneficial to recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF catheter ablation, the hard endpoints of the effect of catheter ablation on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the effect of catheter ablation and drug therapy on recurrent AT/AF patients after AF catheter ablation.Methods and resultsFour thousand nine hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with recurrent AT/AF after catheter ablation from the China-AF registry were enrolled. The patients were divided into two study groups: the repeat catheter ablation group and the medical therapy group. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular mortality or ischaemic stroke or major bleeding events. Secondary endpoints were each component of the primary endpoints and AF recurrence rate. Landmark analysis and Cox regression were used in the statistical analysis. We chose landmark 36 months as the primary landmark date. Over a median follow-up period of 40 ± 24 months, 4913 patients were divided into either the repeat ablation group or the medical therapy group. The cumulative incidence of the composite primary outcome was significantly lower in the repeat ablation group than the medical therapy group (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.89; P = 0.015) of landmark 36 months (2359 patients were included in medical therapy group and 704 patients were included in repeat ablation group at landmark 36 months). However, all secondary endpoints were not statistically different in the two groups, including cardiovascular mortality, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding events, and AF recurrence rate.ConclusionBased on this research, in recurrent AT/AF patients after a catheter ablation procedure, compared with medical therapy, repeat catheter ablation may significantly reduce the risk of the endpoint of composite cardiovascular mortality, ischaemic stroke, and major bleeding events.

Project description:BackgroundThe CABANA (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) trial randomized 2,204 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to catheter ablation or drug therapy. Analysis by intention-to-treat showed a nonsignificant 14% relative reduction in the primary outcome of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess recurrence of AF in the CABANA trial.MethodsThe authors prospectively studied CABANA patients using a proprietary electrocardiogram recording monitor for symptom-activated and 24-h AF auto detection. The AF recurrence endpoint was any post-90-day blanking atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting 30 s or longer. Biannual 96-h Holter monitoring was used to assess AF burden. Patients who used the CABANA monitors and provided 90-day post-blanking recordings qualified for this analysis (n = 1,240; 56% of CABANA population). Treatment comparisons were performed using a modified intention-to-treat approach.ResultsMedian age of the 1,240 patients was 68 years, 34.4% were women, and AF was paroxysmal in 43.0%. Over 60 months of follow-up, first recurrence of any symptomatic or asymptomatic AF (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.60; p < 0.001) or first symptomatic-only AF (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.61; p < 0.001) were both significantly reduced in the catheter ablation group. Baseline Holter AF burden in both treatment groups was 48%. At 12 months, AF burden in ablation patients averaged 6.3%, and in drug-therapy patients, 14.4%. AF burden was significantly less in catheter ablation compared with drug-therapy patients across the 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001). These findings were not sensitive to the baseline pattern of AF.ConclusionsCatheter ablation was effective in reducing recurrence of any AF by 48% and symptomatic AF by 51% compared with drug therapy over 5 years of follow-up. Furthermore, AF burden was also significantly reduced in catheter ablation patients, regardless of their baseline AF type. (Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial [CABANA]; NCT00911508).