Predicting Medication Nonadherence in Older Adults With Difficult-to-Treat Depression in the IRL-GRey Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Nonadherence to antidepressants interferes with optimal treatment of late-life depression. This analysis examines clinical and treatment factors predicting medication nonadherence in difficult-to-treat late-life depression.Methods
Secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in 468 adults aged 60+ years. All participants received venlafaxine XR for 12 weeks. Nonremitters were randomized to augmentation with either aripiprazole or placebo for 12 additional weeks. Medication adherence was assessed 14 times over 24 weeks. The analyses examined sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors that may predict antidepressant nonadherence during early (weeks 1-6), late (weeks 7-12), and augmentation (weeks 13--24) treatment.Results
Poor cognitive function and early response were predictive of early nonadherence. Poor cognitive function and prior nonadherence were predictive of late nonadherence. Living alone was associated with nonadherence both late and during augmentation treatment.Conclusion
Future studies should consider the role of early response and cognitive function to improve antidepressant adherence, particularly among older adults who live alone.
SUBMITTER: Altmann HM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9356982 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Predicting Medication Nonadherence in Older Adults With Difficult-to-Treat Depression in the IRL-GRey Randomized Controlled Trial.
Altmann Helene M HM Kazan Joseph J Gebara Marie Anne MA Blumberger Daniel M DM Karp Jordan F JF Lenze Eric J EJ Mulsant Benoit H BH Reynolds Charles F CF Stahl Sarah T ST
The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 20220310 9
<h4>Objective</h4>Nonadherence to antidepressants interferes with optimal treatment of late-life depression. This analysis examines clinical and treatment factors predicting medication nonadherence in difficult-to-treat late-life depression.<h4>Methods</h4>Secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in 468 adults aged 60+ years. All participants received venlafaxine XR for 12 weeks. Nonremitters were randomized to augmentation ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectiveThis study explored whether older black and white adults with major depressive disorder differed in rates of remission or attrition during open-label treatment with venlafaxine and supportive care.MethodsA total of 47 black (10%) and 412 white (90%) adults age ≥60 were treated with open-label venlafaxine extended-release (≤300 mg per day) for 12-14 weeks during the initial phase of an multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled augmentation trial. Participants were help-seeking older adults with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (single or recurrent episode) referred from specialty clinics, primary care practices, advertisements, and research programs. Remission was defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 for two consecutive assessments at the end of 12 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves displayed time to dropout and time to initial remission. Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in attrition and remission rates.ResultsBlack participants had greater baseline general medical comorbidity, worse physical health-related quality of life, and poorer cognitive function than white participants. White participants were more likely to have received an adequate trial of antidepressant and psychotherapy before study entry. Baseline depression severity, depression duration, age at onset, and recurrence history did not differ between groups. The groups had similar final doses of venlafaxine and similar rates of attrition and remission. Side-effect profiles were comparable between the groups.ConclusionsDespite greater medical comorbidity, lower cognitive function, and less adequate prior exposure to antidepressant treatment and psychotherapy, black participants were no more likely to discontinue antidepressant pharmacotherapy and experienced a rate of remission comparable to white participants.
| S-EPMC4666813 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveRecently, several academics have recommended that the concept of difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) should be considered in some of the cases where achieving or maintaining remission of depressive symptoms is not possible. In 2020, a consensus statement, not based on a formal process and systematic review defined difficult-to-treat depression as "depression that continues to cause significant burden despite normal treatment efforts". In addition to addressing symptom control, interventions for DTD should also target other factors, including the management of psychiatric and medical comorbidities, psychosocial functioning, self-esteem, and self-management strategies. The purpose of this scoping review is to explore the scientific literature, which is still unclear and vague, regarding the pathophysiology and treatment of difficult-to-treat depression, providing a summary of its current conceptualization. This represents a cultural and scientific shift that offers clinicians and researchers valid and up-to-date study criteria, thus expanding upon the model of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Consequently contributions, concepts, theories and gaps of the state of the art in the description of difficult-to-treat depression have been summarized here.MethodA research study was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Open Grey databases to identify and examine articles reporting key features related to the recent concept of difficult-to-treat depression. The research covered a period of time between January 1, 2013, and March 1, 2023. Based on a formal checklist, two researchers independently assessed the eligibility criteria to determine which studies to include or exclude in this search. Further data evaluations were conducted for the articles that were deemed to have the most comprehensive descriptions.ResultsThe results of the research yielded a body of literature that provides a clear definition of difficult-to-treat depression and insights into its clinical application and research perspective.ConclusionsDTD represents a cultural and scientific shift that provides clinicians and researchers with valid and up-to-date study criteria that allow the extension of the treatment-resistant depression (TRD) model. The main difference lies in the operational process of assessment and intervention in the depressive syndrome in relation to the search for a therapeutic response. The results of this review show that DTD is a theoretically and clinically useful conceptualization for depressive syndromes that are not just simply resistant to treatment. This clinical condition entails a novel clinical therapeutic approach for specific patients and may be used throughout the world to help recognize this clinical condition while optimizing overall care for these patients. However, as we have highlighted, in the absence of RCTs and further observational studies, it is desirable that DTD be further investigated and defined..
| S-EPMC10375274 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionFor the past 20 years vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been an approved invasive treatment option for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) across Europe. In contrast to more common treatments, such as ECT, knowledge about VNS is low both in the general population and among professionals.MethodsIn this narrative review, we provide a clinically and scientifically sound overview of VNS. Hypotheses on the mechanism of action as well as the current evidence base on efficacy are presented. Perioperative management, adverse event profile and follow-up including dose titration are described. A comparison of international guideline recommendations on VNS is also provided. Furthermore, we formulate criteria that are helpful in the selection of appropriate patients.ResultsElectrical impulses are transmitted afferently via the vagus nerve and stimulate a neuromodulatory cerebral network via different pathways. Many studies and case series demonstrated the efficacy of VNS as an adjuvant procedure for TRD. The effect occurs with a latency period of 3-12 months and possibly increases with the duration of VNS. If stimulation recommendations are followed, side effects are tolerable for most patients.ConclusionThe use of VNS is an approved, effective and well-tolerated long-term therapy for chronic and treatment-resistant depression. Further sham-controlled studies over a longer observational period are desirable to improve the evidence.
| S-EPMC9452433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceUnderstanding if the association of social programs with health care access and utilization, especially among older adults with costly chronic medical conditions, can help in improving strategies for self-management of disease.ObjectiveTo examine whether participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is associated with a reduced likelihood of low-income older adults with diabetes (aged ≥65 years) needing to forgo medications because of cost.Design, setting, and participantsThis repeated cross-sectional, population-based study included 1302 seniors who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 2013 through 2016. Individuals in the study were diagnosed with diabetes or borderline diabetes, were eligible to receive SNAP benefits, were prescribed medications, and incurred more than zero US dollars in out-of-pocket medical expenses in the past year. The data analysis was performed from October 2017 to April 2018.ExposuresSelf-reported participation in SNAP.Main outcomes and measuresCost-related medication nonadherence derived from responses to whether in the past year, older adults with diabetes delayed refilling a prescription, took less medication, and skipped medication doses because of cost. To estimate the association between participation in SNAP and cost-related medication nonadherence, we used 2-stage, regression-adjusted propensity score matching, conditional on sociodemographic and health and health care-related characteristics of individuals. Estimated propensity scores were used to create matched groups of participants in SNAP and eligible nonparticipants. After matching, a fully adjusted weighted model that included all covariates plus food security status was used to estimate the association between SNAP and cost-related medication nonadherence in the matched sample.ResultsThe final analytic sample before matching included 1385 older adults (448 [32.3%] men, 769 [55.5%] non-Hispanic white, and 628 [45.3%] aged ≥75 years), with 503 of them participating in SNAP (36.3%) and 178 reporting cost-related medication nonadherence (12.9%) in the past year. After matching, 1302 older adults were retained (434 [33.3%] men, 716 [55.0%] non-Hispanic white, and 581 [44.6%] aged ≥75 years); treatment and comparison groups were similar for all characteristics. Participants in SNAP had a moderate decrease in cost-related medication nonadherence compared with eligible nonparticipants (5.3 percentage point reduction; 95% CI, 0.5-10.0 percentage point reduction; P = .03). Similar reductions were observed for subgroups that had prescription drug coverage (5.8 percentage point reduction; 95% CI, 0.6-11.0) and less than $500 in out-of-pocket medical costs in the previous year (6.4 percentage point reduction; 95% CI, 0.8-11.9), but not for older adults lacking prescription coverage or those with higher medical costs. Results remained robust to several sensitivity analyses.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings suggest that participation in SNAP may help improve adherence to treatment regimens among older adults with diabetes. Connecting these individuals with SNAP may be a feasible strategy for improving health outcomes.
| S-EPMC6583428 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceRising prescription drug costs and increasing prices for consumer goods may increase cost-related medication nonadherence. Cost-conscious prescribing can be supported by real-time benefit tools, but patient views on real-time benefit tool use and their potential benefits and harms are largely unexplored.ObjectiveTo assess older adults' cost-related medication nonadherence, cost-coping strategies, and views on the use of real-time benefit tools in clinical practice.Design, setting, and participantsA weighted, nationally representative survey of adults aged 65 years and older administered via the internet and telephone from June 2022 to September 2022.Main outcomes and measuresCost-related medication nonadherence; cost coping strategies; desire for cost conversations; potential benefits and harms from real-time benefit tool use.ResultsAmong 2005 respondents, most were female (54.7%) and partnered (59.7%); 40.4% were 75 years or older. Cost-related medication nonadherence was reported by 20.2% of participants. Some respondents used extreme forms of cost-coping, including foregoing basic needs (8.5%) or going into debt (4.8%) to afford medications. Of respondents, 89.0% reported being comfortable or neutral about being screened before a physician's visit for wanting to have medication cost conversations and 89.5% indicated a desire for their physician to use a real-time benefit tool. Respondents expressed concern if prices were inaccurate, with 49.9% of those with cost-related nonadherence and 39.3% of those without reporting they would be extremely upset if their actual medication price was more than what their physician estimated with a real-time benefit tool. If the actual price was much more than the estimated real-time benefit tool price, nearly 80% of respondents with cost-related nonadherence reported that it would affect their decision to start or keep taking a medication. Furthermore, 54.2% of those with any cost-related nonadherence and 30% of those without reported they would be moderately or extremely upset if their physicians used a medication price tool but chose not to discuss prices with them.Conclusions and relevanceIn 2022, approximately 1 in 5 older adults reported cost-related nonadherence. Real-time benefit tools may support medication cost conversations and cost-conscious prescribing, and patients are enthusiastic about their use. However, if disclosed prices are inaccurate, there is potential for harm through loss of confidence in the physician and nonadherence to prescribed medications.
| S-EPMC10196872 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Multimodal analysis reveals characteristic central nervous system alterations in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis
| PRJEB88406 | ENA
Project description:BackgroundNeural predictors underlying variability in depression outcomes are poorly understood. Functional MRI measures of subgenual cortex connectivity, self-blaming and negative perceptual biases have shown prognostic potential in treatment-naïve, medication-free and fully remitting forms of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, their role in more chronic, difficult-to-treat forms of MDD is unknown.MethodsForty-five participants (n = 38 meeting minimum data quality thresholds) fulfilled criteria for difficult-to-treat MDD. Clinical outcome was determined by computing percentage change at follow-up from baseline (four months) on the self-reported Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (16-item). Baseline measures included self-blame-selective connectivity of the right superior anterior temporal lobe with an a priori Brodmann Area 25 region-of-interest, blood-oxygen-level-dependent a priori bilateral amygdala activation for subliminal sad vs happy faces, and resting-state connectivity of the subgenual cortex with an a priori defined ventrolateral prefrontal cortex/insula region-of-interest.FindingsA linear regression model showed that baseline severity of depressive symptoms explained 3% of the variance in outcomes at follow-up (F[3,34] = .33, p = .81). In contrast, our three pre-registered neural measures combined, explained 32% of the variance in clinical outcomes (F[4,33] = 3.86, p = .01).ConclusionThese findings corroborate the pathophysiological relevance of neural signatures of emotional biases and their potential as predictors of outcomes in difficult-to-treat depression.
| S-EPMC11869767 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceSafe, efficacious, second-line pharmacological treatment options exist for the large portion of older adults with major depressive disorder who do not respond to first-line pharmacotherapy. However, limited evidence exists to aid clinical decision making regarding which patients will benefit from which second-line treatments.ObjectiveTo test the moderating role of pretreatment executive function, severity of anxiety, and severity of medical comorbidity in remission of treatment-resistant late-life depression after aripiprazole augmentation.Design, setting, and participantsAs follow-up to a 12-week randomized clinical trial of aripiprazole augmentation for first-line treatment-resistant late-life depression (Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission [IRL-GRey]), we evaluated the effects of the following potential moderators and their interactions with treatment: baseline assessments of executive function (set shifting measured by the Trail Making Test) and response inhibition control (measured by a Color-Word Interference task), anxiety symptoms, and medical comorbidity. Analyses were conducted in May and June 2015.InterventionsAripiprazole or placebo tablets were started at 2 mg daily and titrated as tolerated, to a maximal dose of 15 mg daily.Main outcomes and measuresRemission of treatment-resistant late-life depression (defined as a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 at both of the last 2 consecutive visits).ResultsOf 181 trial participants (103 female [56.9%]) who were 60 years of age or older and whose major depression had failed to remit with venlafaxine hydrochloride monotherapy, 91 received aripiprazole and 90 received placebo. Remission occurred in 40 (43%) who received aripiprazole and 26 (29%) who received placebo. Baseline set shifting moderated the efficacy of aripiprazole augmentation (odds ratio [OR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.05-2.62]; P = .03 for interaction with treatment). Among participants with a Trail Making Test scaled score of 7 or higher, the odds of remission were significantly higher with aripiprazole than with placebo (53% vs 28%; number needed to treat, 4; OR, 4.11 [95% CI, 1.83-9.20]). Among participants with a Trail Making Test scaled score of less than 7, aripiprazole and placebo were equally efficacious (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.15-2.80]). Greater severity of anxiety at baseline predicted a lower remission rate but did not moderate aripiprazole efficacy; each standard deviation greater anxiety severity was associated with 50% reduced odds of remission in both aripiprazole and placebo arms. Medical comorbidity and Color-Word Interference test performance were neither general predictors nor treatment-moderating factors.Conclusions and relevanceSet-shifting performance indicates which older adults with treatment-resistant depression may respond favorably to augmentation with aripiprazole and thus may help to personalize treatment.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00892047.
| S-EPMC4823175 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe authors assessed central nervous system (CNS) polypharmacy among low-income, racially diverse homebound older adults with depression (N=277) and its associations with the participants' ratings of depressive symptoms and pain.MethodsCNS-active and other psychotropic and analgesic medications intake was collected from patients' medication containers. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and pain intensity was measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Covariates were disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) and perceived social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support).ResultsOf the patients, 16% engaged in CNS polypharmacy, taking three or more CNS-active medications. Of these, 69%, 69%, and 89% were using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and opioids, respectively. Higher pain intensity ratings were associated with CNS polypharmacy. Benzodiazepine users were more likely than nonusers to use opioids.ConclusionsMedication reviews and improved access to evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatments are needed for these older individuals with depression.
| S-EPMC7528951 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe diagnostic validity of clinical airway assessment tests for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in patients requiring endotracheal intubation were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and a grey zone approach.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, patients were evaluated during a pre-anaesthetic visit. Predictive airway assessment tests (i.e. Modified Mallampati [MMT] classification; upper lip bite test [ULBT]; mouth opening; sternomental distance; thyromental distance [TMD]; neck circumference; neck mobility; height to thyromental distance [HT/TMD]; neck circumference-to-thyromental distance [NC/TMD]) were performed on each patient and LEMON, Naguib, and MACOCHA scores were also calculated. In addition, laryngeal images were acquired and assessed for percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores. A POGO score of zero was categorized as difficult laryngoscopy.ResultsThe incidence of difficult laryngoscopy was 14.4% (35/243). Although seven predictive airway assessments (i.e. MMT classification, ULBT, mouth opening, HT/TMD, NC/TMD, and the LEMON and Naguib models) predicted difficult laryngoscopy by ROC analyses, a grey zone approach showed that the parameters were inconclusive in approximately 70% of patients. From all the tests, the HT/TMD ratio showed the highest sensitivity (80.0%) and ULBT had the highest specificity (95.2%).ConclusionUsing the grey zone approach, all predictive airway assessment tests showed large inconclusive zones which may explain previous inconsistent results in the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Our results suggest that the usefulness of clinical airway evaluation tests for predicting difficult laryngoscopy remains controversial.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01719848).
| S-EPMC5536638 | biostudies-literature