Dataset Information

Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?

ABSTRACT:

Purpose of review

Alteplase has been the thrombolytic of choice for acute ischaemic stroke for more than two decades. A thrombolytic which is easier to administer and with improved or comparable safety and efficacy is desirable. Tenecteplase has emerged as a potential successor, and its off-license use in acute ischaemic stroke has increased in recent years. We aimed to examine the evidence base for each drug and discuss their use in varying patient populations in acute ischaemic stroke.

Recent findings

Several trials comparing tenecteplase and alteplase have reported very recently with the results of the ACT trial strengthening the argument in favour of non-inferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase. Ongoing trials such as ATTEST-2 are of interest, and trials such as TASTE and TEMPO-2 will shed further light on use of tenecteplase in specific populations.

Summary

A single thrombolytic agent for all indications for thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke is desirable in streamlining workflows. Based on recent and upcoming trials, guidelines may soon recommend tenecteplase as a suitable alternative to alteplase. The use of tenecteplase in specific subgroups will depend on further recruitment to ongoing clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Mahmood A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9362569 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?

Mahmood Ammad A Muir Keith W KW

Current treatment options in neurology 20220730 10

<h4>Purpose of review</h4>Alteplase has been the thrombolytic of choice for acute ischaemic stroke for more than two decades. A thrombolytic which is easier to administer and with improved or comparable safety and efficacy is desirable. Tenecteplase has emerged as a potential successor, and its off-license use in acute ischaemic stroke has increased in recent years. We aimed to examine the evidence base for each drug and discuss their use in varying patient populations in acute ischaemic stroke. ...[more]

PMID: 35965955

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase for emergency treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, limited data are available comparing their clinical effectiveness in routine clinical practice.ObjectiveTo compare short-term effectiveness and safety outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tenecteplase vs alteplase.Design, setting, and participantsThis comparative effectiveness study used data prospectively collected from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022, from the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry.ExposureConsecutive patients with ischemic stroke treated with either tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours from last known well time were included.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was functional independence on discharge (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, 0-2). Secondary effectiveness end points included disability free at discharge (mRS score, 0-1), discharge home, and independent ambulation at discharge. Safety end points included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours and combined in-hospital mortality or hospice discharge. Generalized linear mixed models were fit to evaluate associations between exposure to tenecteplase (vs alteplase) and end points after adjustment for demographic, clinical, and hospital-level variables. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs were computed.ResultsAmong 79 550 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, the mean (SD) age was 68.6 (14.8) years, 38 596 (48.5%) were female, and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 7 (IQR, 4-13). Of these patients, 9465 (11.9%) received tenecteplase (mean [SD] age, 69.6 [14.7] years; median NIHSS score, 7 [IQR, 4-14]; 4504 [47.6%] female) and 70 085 (88.1%) received alteplase (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [14.8] years; median NIHSS score, 7 [IQR, 4-13]; 34 092 [48.6%] female). After adjustment for covariates, no significant differences were found between tenecteplase and alteplase in effectiveness or safety outcomes for the overall cohort, including functional independence at discharge (AOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.07), sICH (AOR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.83-1.11), and in-hospital mortality or hospice discharge (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07), but significant improvement was found in discharge home (AOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53), in-hospital mortality (AOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85), and composite in-hospital mortality or hospice discharge (AOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97) among those who were eligible for but did not undergo endovascular thrombectomy.Conclusions and relevanceThis large, nationwide comparative effectiveness study using data from routine clinical practice demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety outcomes with tenecteplase compared with alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study supports tenecteplase as a reasonable alternative to alteplase.

Project description:ImportanceTenecteplase is a bioengineered variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and a longer half-life, allowing single-bolus administration. Evidence on the treatment effect of tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited.ObjectiveTo establish the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase in patients with AIS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.Design, setting, and participantsThe ORIGINAL study was a multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, noninferiority trial conducted between July 14, 2021, and July 14, 2023. Participants were recruited from 55 neurology clinics and stroke centers in China and were eligible if they had AIS with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 1 to 25 with measurable neurologic deficit and were symptomatic for at least 30 minutes without significant improvement.InterventionsPatients were randomized (1:1) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to receive intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 (no symptoms or no significant disability) at day 90, tested for noninferiority (risk ratio [RR] margin, 0.937). Safety end points included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition) and 90-day all-cause mortality.ResultsAmong the 1489 patients randomized, 1465 patients were included in the full analysis set (732 in the tenecteplase group; 733 in the alteplase group) and 446 (30.4%) were female. The primary outcome occurred in 72.7% (532/732) of patients receiving tenecteplase and 70.3% (515/733) receiving alteplase (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97-1.09]; noninferiority threshold met). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 9 patients (1.2%) in each group (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.37-2.70]). The 90-day mortality rate was 4.6% (34/732) in the tenecteplase group and 5.8% (43/736) in the alteplase group (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.51-1.23]).Conclusions and relevanceIn patients with AIS eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours after stroke onset, tenecteplase was noninferior to alteplase with respect to excellent functional outcome (mRS score of 0 or 1) at 90 days and had a similar safety profile. Findings from this study support tenecteplase as a suitable alternative to alteplase in this setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04915729.

Dataset Information

Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Summary

Publications

Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets