Dataset Information

Patterns of Practice and Improvements in Survival Among Patients With Stage 2/3 Rectal Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

This study quantifies the trends in trimodality therapy use and its association with pathologic stage and overall survival of patients with rectal cancer at the population level.

Objective

To describe changes between 2006 and 2016 in the sequence and use of chemotherapy/radiation therapy (C/RT), multiagent (MA) chemotherapy, and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer and identify associations with pathologic stage and survival over time.

Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cohort analysis included patient records from the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2016. Of 110 372 patient records, 77 905 were excluded owing to not receiving trimodality therapy and other predefined exclusion criteria. The final analytic cohort comprised 32 467 patients records treated with trimodality therapy, with 24 297 considered in the survival analysis. Data analysis was performed between June 2020 and December 2021.

Exposures

Trimodality therapy was defined as including all of the following: definitive surgery; radiation therapy (RT), alone or in combination with chemotherapy; and neoadjuvant/adjuvant single-agent (SA) or multiagent (MA) chemotherapy independent of RT.

Main outcomes and measures

Using Cox multivariable survival analyses across demographics, surgery type, stage, year of diagnosis, and facility type, treatment groups were allocated as the following: group A: TNT (n = 8883 [27%]); group B: preoperative C/RT plus postoperative SA chemotherapy (n = 5967 [18%]); group C: preoperative C/RT plus postoperative MA chemotherapy (n = 12 926 [40%]); and group D: postoperative C/RT plus MA chemotherapy (n = 4689 [14%]).

Results

The final analytic cohort comprised 32 467 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 57.6 [11.6] years; 12 549 [38.7%] women and 19 918 [61.3%] men). Comparing 2016 with 2006, treatment shifted to fewer patients receiving postoperative C/RT (group D) (28% vs 8%; P < .001), and more preoperative C/RT and postoperative MA chemotherapy (group C) (24% vs 45%; P < .001) being used. While clinical stage 2 and 3 distribution remained unchanged, pathologic downstaging was observed to stages 0, 1, 2, and 3: 0.60%, 10%, 31%, and 57% vs 2.8%, 22%, 29%, and 45%, from 2006 to 2015, respectively (P < .001). More recent year of diagnosis was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87) for mortality within 36 months after diagnosis (2015 vs 2006).

Conclusions and relevance

In this cohort study, the shift toward preoperative C/RT and lower pathologic stage was associated with improved overall survival in stage 2/3 rectal cancers.

SUBMITTER: Kennecke HF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9389431 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patterns of Practice and Improvements in Survival Among Patients With Stage 2/3 Rectal Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy.

Kennecke Hagen F HF Bahnson Henry T HT Lin Bruce B O'Rourke Colin C Kaplan Jennifer J Pham Huong H Suen Andrew A Simianu Vlad V VV

JAMA oncology 20221001 10

<h4>Importance</h4>This study quantifies the trends in trimodality therapy use and its association with pathologic stage and overall survival of patients with rectal cancer at the population level.<h4>Objective</h4>To describe changes between 2006 and 2016 in the sequence and use of chemotherapy/radiation therapy (C/RT), multiagent (MA) chemotherapy, and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with stage 2/3 rectal cancer and identify associations with pathologic stage and survival over tim ...[more]

PMID: 35980607

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceIn March 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorsed watch and wait for those with complete clinical response to total neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is highly efficacious, so this recommendation may have broad implications, but the current trends in organ preservation in the US are unknown.ObjectiveTo describe organ preservation trends among patients with rectal cancer in the US from 2006 to 2020.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective, observational case series included adults (aged ≥18 years) with rectal adenocarcinoma managed with curative intent from 2006 to 2020 in the National Cancer Database.ExposureThe year of treatment was the primary exposure. The type of therapy was chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery (proctectomy, transanal local excision, no tumor resection). The timing of therapy was classified as neoadjuvant or adjuvant.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the absolute annual proportion of organ preservation after radical treatment, defined as chemotherapy and/or radiation without tumor resection, proctectomy, or transanal local excision. A secondary analysis examined complete pathologic responses among eligible patients.ResultsOf the 175 545 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 63 (13) years, 39.7% were female, 17.4% had clinical stage I disease, 24.7% had stage IIA to IIC disease, 32.1% had stage IIIA to IIIC disease, and 25.7% had unknown stage. The absolute annual proportion of organ preservation increased by 9.8 percentage points (from 18.4% in 2006 to 28.2% in 2020; P < .001). From 2006 to 2020, the absolute rate of organ preservation increased by 13.0 percentage points for patients with stage IIA to IIC disease (19.5% to 32.5%), 12.9 percentage points for patients with stage IIIA to IIC disease (16.2% to 29.1%), and 10.1 percentage points for unknown stages (16.5% to 26.6%; all P < .001). Conversely, patients with stage I disease experienced a 6.1-percentage point absolute decline in organ preservation (from 26.4% in 2006 to 20.3% in 2020; P < .001). The annual rate of transanal local excisions decreased for all stages. In the subgroup of 80 607 eligible patients, the proportion of complete pathologic responses increased from 6.5% in 2006 to 18.8% in 2020 (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThis case series shows that rectal cancer is increasingly being managed medically, especially among patients whose treatment historically relied on proctectomy. Given the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorsement of watch and wait, the increasing trends in organ preservation, and the nearly 3-fold increase in complete pathologic responses, international professional societies should urgently develop multidisciplinary core outcome sets and care quality indicators to ensure high-quality rectal cancer research and care delivery accounting for organ preservation.

Project description:Background:Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is currently standard of care in stage II-III rectal cancer, resulting in tumor downstaging for patients with treatment-responsive disease. However, the prognosis of the downstaged patient remains controversial. This work critically analyzes the relative contribution of pre- and post-therapy staging to the anticipated survival of downstaged patients. Methods:The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with rectal cancer treated with transabdominal resection between 2004 and 2014. Stage II-III patients downstaged with neoadjuvant radiation were compared with stage I patients treated with definitive resection alone. Patients with positive surgical margins were excluded. Overall survival was evaluated using both Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results:A total of 44 320 patients were eligible for analysis. Survival was equivalent for patients presenting with cT1N0 disease undergoing resection (mean survival = 113.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 110.8 to 115.3 months) compared with those downstaged to pT1N0 from both cT3N0 (mean survival = 114.9 months, 95% CI = 110.4 to 119.3 months, P = .12) and cT3N1 disease (mean survival = 115.4 months, 95% CI = 110.1 to 120.7 months, P = .22). Survival statistically significantly improved in patients downstaged to pT2N0 from cT3N0 disease (mean survival = 109.0 months, 95% CI = 106.7 to 111.2 months, P < .001) and cT3N1 (mean survival = 112.8 months, 95% CI = 110.0 to 115.7 months, P < .001), compared with cT2N0 patients undergoing resection alone (mean survival = 100.0 months, 95% CI = 97.5 to 102.5 months). Multiple survival analysis confirmed that final pathologic stage dictated long-term outcomes in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiation (hazard ratio [HR] of pT2 = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.41; HR of pT3 = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.61 to 2.05; HR of pT4 = 2.72, 95% CI = 2.28 to 3.25, all P ≤ .001 vs pT1; HR of pN1 = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.41 to 1.59; HR of pN2 = 2.17, 95% CI = 2.00 to 2.35, both P < .001 vs pN0); while clinical stage at presentation had little to no predictive value (HR of cT2 = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.95, P = .008; HR of cT3 = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.96, P = .009; HR of cT4 = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.21, P = .87 vs cT1; HR of cN1 = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.02, P = .19; HR of cN2 = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.08, P = .48 vs cN0). Conclusions:Survival in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant radiation is driven by post-therapy pathologic stage, regardless of pretherapy clinical stage. These data will further inform prognostic discussions with patients.

Dataset Information

Patterns of Practice and Improvements in Survival Among Patients With Stage 2/3 Rectal Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Exposures

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Patterns of Practice and Improvements in Survival Among Patients With Stage 2/3 Rectal Cancer Treated With Trimodality Therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets