Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Improving on-treatment risk stratification of cancer patients with refined response classification and integration of circulating tumor DNA kinetics.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Significant intertumoral heterogeneity exists as antitumor treatment is introduced. Heterogeneous therapeutic responses are conventionally evaluated by imaging examinations based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); nevertheless, there are increasing recognitions that they do not fully capture patient clinical benefits. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the clinical implication of biological responses assessed by liquid biopsy of on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Here, we investigated whether biological response evaluated by ctDNA kinetics added critical information to the RECIST, and whether integrating on-treatment biological response information refined risk stratification of cancer patients.

Methods

In this population-based cohort study, we included 821 patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharynx of head and neck cancer (NPC) receiving sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), who had pretreatment and on-treatment cfEBV DNA and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance. Biological responses evaluated by cfEBV DNA were profiled and compared with conventional MRI-based RECIST evaluation. The inverse probability weighting (IPW)-adjusted survival analysis was performed for major survival endpoints. The Cox proportional hazard regression [CpH]-based model was developed to predict the on-treatment ctDNA-based individualized survival.

Results

Of 821 patients, 71.4% achieved complete biological response (cBR) upon NAC completion. RECIST-based response evaluations had 25.3% discordance with ctDNA-based evaluations. IPW-adjusted survival analysis revealed that cfEBV DNApost-NAC was a preferential prognosticator for all endpoints, especially for distant metastasis. In contrast, radiological response was more preferentially associated with locoregional recurrence. Intriguingly, cfEBV DNApost-NAC further stratified RECIST-responsive and non-responsive patients; RECIST-based non-responsive patients with cBR still derived substantial clinical benefits. Moreover, detectable cfEBV DNApost-NAC had 83.6% prediction sensitivity for detectable post-treatment ctDNA, which conferred early determination of treatment benefits. Finally, we established individualized risk prediction models and demonstrated that introducing on-treatment ctDNA significantly refined risk stratification.

Conclusions

Our study helps advance the implementation of ctDNA-based testing in therapeutic response evaluation for a refined risk stratification. The dynamic and refined risk profiling would tailor future liquid biopsy-based risk-adapted personalized therapy.

SUBMITTER: Lv J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9396864 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Improving on-treatment risk stratification of cancer patients with refined response classification and integration of circulating tumor DNA kinetics.

Lv Jiawei J   Wu Chenfei C   Li Junyan J   Chen Foping F   He Shiwei S   He Qingmei Q   Zhou Guanqun G   Ma Jun J   Sun Ying Y   Wei Denghui D   Lin Li L  

BMC medicine 20220823 1


<h4>Background</h4>Significant intertumoral heterogeneity exists as antitumor treatment is introduced. Heterogeneous therapeutic responses are conventionally evaluated by imaging examinations based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); nevertheless, there are increasing recognitions that they do not fully capture patient clinical benefits. Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the clinical implication of biological responses assessed by liquid biopsy of on-treatment  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8816939 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10419411 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8069589 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9468369 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8267662 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8791609 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10001035 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8430583 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10643998 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10158775 | biostudies-literature