Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Depth of invasion (DOI) is important for the T-classification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT) and incorporated in the TNM 8 classification of oral cavity cancer. To determine DOI clinical palpation is performed, but the preferred radiological modality remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment of DOI using ultrasound (US-DOI).Methods
The DOI was assessed in 40 patients with T1-T3 SCCOT by ultrasound, palpation, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Histopathological DOI (H-DOI) was gold standard. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA).Results
The mean difference of US-DOI was -0.5 mm (95% LOA -4.9-4.0) compared to H-DOI and the mean difference for MRI was 3.9 mm (95% LOA -2.3-10.2). In the subgroup analysis of cT1-T2 the US-DOI mean difference was 0.1 mm and the 95% LOA limits -2.5-2.7.Conclusions
Ultrasound seems to be the most accurate method to assess DOI in T1-T2 SCCOT. MRI overestimates DOI and cannot assess a substantial proportion of the tumors.Level of evidence
2c.
SUBMITTER: Nilsson O
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9575113 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Nilsson Olof O Knutsson Johan J Landström Fredrik J FJ Magnuson Anders A von Beckerath Mathias M
Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology 20220824 5
<h4>Background</h4>Depth of invasion (DOI) is important for the T-classification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue (SCCOT) and incorporated in the TNM 8 classification of oral cavity cancer. To determine DOI clinical palpation is performed, but the preferred radiological modality remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment of DOI using ultrasound (US-DOI).<h4>Methods</h4>The DOI was assessed in 40 patients with T1-T3 SCCOT by ultrasound, palpation, ...[more]