Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The value of continuous symptom monitoring in people with essential tremor is uncertain.Objectives
To determine the relationship between tremor amplitude measured with wearable inertial sensors and clinician- and patient-rated measures.Methods
For 14 days, patients (1) wore inertial sensors on both wrists, (2) self-rated their tremor using a diary, (3) drew spirals, and (4) completed an activities of daily living scale once daily. Patients were also scored using The Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) performance in the clinic by a clinician.Results
We found strong correlations in patient-reported metrics of tremor, but weak correlations between these data and both the inertial sensor data and the in-clinic TETRAS scores.Conclusions
The patient experience of tremor during normal daily activities may differ from the transducer-based measures of tremor amplitude and rating scales of tremor severity. Future studies should consider how to record features of tremor that are important to patients.
SUBMITTER: McGurrin P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9631851 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
McGurrin Patrick P McNames James J Haubenberger Dietrich D Hallett Mark M
Movement disorders clinical practice 20220918 8
<h4>Background</h4>The value of continuous symptom monitoring in people with essential tremor is uncertain.<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the relationship between tremor amplitude measured with wearable inertial sensors and clinician- and patient-rated measures.<h4>Methods</h4>For 14 days, patients (1) wore inertial sensors on both wrists, (2) self-rated their tremor using a diary, (3) drew spirals, and (4) completed an activities of daily living scale once daily. Patients were also scored usin ...[more]