Dataset Information

Factors Associated With Time to Achieve Physical Functional Recovery in Patients With Severe Stoke After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To describe characteristics of patient with severe stroke (FIM motor score [FIM motor] 20-49 at admission) and examine association between pre-specified factors (age, sex, modified Rankin Scale before stroke onset, body mass index, FIM motor, and FIM cognitive) and time to achieve FIM motor ≥70, that is, self-independent level.

Design

Retrospective cohort study using a large database in Japan.

Setting

Rehabilitation wards.

Participants

Patients with severe stroke (N=1422) who received inpatient rehabilitation were included (median age: 76 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 68.0-84.0). A total of 54.6% were men, and 65.8% were ischemic stroke.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main outcome measures

Time to achieve FIM motor ≥70.

Results

After inpatient rehabilitation, 40.4% (N=575) achieved FIM motor ≥70 (admission FIM motor 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49: 18.6%, 33.6%, and 47.8%, respectively). Patients who achieved FIM motor ≥70 stayed median 81.0 days [IQR, 51.0-120.0]) and received median: 6.94 units per day [IQR, 5.48-7.78], 1 unit=20 minutes). Adjusted Fine-Gray regression revealed that shorter time to achieve FIM motor ≥70 was associated with higher admission FIM motor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-3.62]: 20-29 vs 40-49), higher admission FIM cognitive (HR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.39-2.35]: 5-14 vs 25-35), and younger (HR 3.20 [95% CI: 2.32-4.42]: ≥85 years vs 20-69 years).

Conclusions

Most patients with severe stroke did not achieve FIM motor ≥70 after inpatient rehabilitation. Older patients and patients with lower admission FIM motor require more attention. They should be prioritized for state-of-the-art rehabilitation therapy.

SUBMITTER: Yamaura R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9761254 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Factors Associated With Time to Achieve Physical Functional Recovery in Patients With Severe Stroke After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Yamaura Reiko R Kaneko Tetsuji T Ishikawa Koichi Benjamin KB Ikeda Shunya S Fushimi Kiyohide K Yamazaki Tsutomu T

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation 20220907 4

<h4>Objective</h4>To describe characteristics of patient with severe stroke (FIM motor score [FIM motor] 20-49 at admission) and examine association between pre-specified factors (age, sex, modified Rankin Scale before stroke onset, body mass index, FIM motor, and FIM cognitive) and time to achieve FIM motor ≥70, that is, self-independent level.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort study using a large database in Japan.<h4>Setting</h4>Rehabilitation wards.<h4>Participants</h4>Patients with severe ...[more]

PMID: 36545532

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHaemorrhagic stroke, accounting for 10-20% of all strokes, often requires decompressive surgery as a life-saving measure for cases with massive oedema and raised intracranial pressure. This study was conducted to compare the demographics, characteristics and rehabilitation profiles of patients with severe haemorrhagic stroke who were managed surgically versus those who were managed non-surgically.MethodsA single-centre retrospective study of electronic medical records was conducted over a 3-year period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020. The inclusion criteria were first haemorrhagic stroke, age of >18 years and an admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) score of 18-40 upon admission to the rehabilitation centre. The primary outcome measure was discharge FIM™. Secondary outcome measures included modified Rankin Scale (mRS), rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS) and complication rates.ResultsA total of 107 patients' records were analysed; 45 (42.1%) received surgical intervention and 62 (57.9%) patients underwent non-surgical management. Surgically managed patients were significantly younger than non-surgical patients, with a mean age of [surgical 53.1 (SD 12) vs. non-surgical 61.6 (SD 12.3), p = 0.001]. Admission FIM was significantly lower in the surgical vs. non-surgical group [23.7 (SD6.7) vs. 26.71 (SD 7.4), p = 0.031). However, discharge FIM was similar between both groups [surgical 53.91 (SD23.0) vs. non-surgical 57.0 (SD23.6), p = 0.625). Similarly, FIM gain (surgical 30.1 (SD 21.1) vs. non-surgical 30.3 (SD 21.1), p = 0.094) and RLOS [surgical 56.2 days (SD 21.5) vs. non-surgical 52.0 days (SD 23.4), p = 0.134) were not significantly different between groups. The majority of patients were discharged home (surgical 73.3% vs. non-surgical 74.2%, p = 0.920) despite a high level of dependency.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that patients with surgically managed haemorrhagic stroke, while older and more dependent on admission to rehabilitation, achieved comparable FIM gains, discharge FIM and discharge home rates after ~8 weeks of rehabilitation. This highlights the importance of rehabilitation, especially for surgically managed haemorrhagic stroke patients.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify functional performance trajectories and the characteristics of people who receive inpatient geriatric rehabilitation after hospital admissions.Design, setting, participantsREStORing health of acutely unwell adulTs (RESORT) is an observational, prospective, longitudinal inception cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to geriatric rehabilitation wards at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Recruitment commenced on 15 October 2017.Main outcome measuresFunctional performance, assessed with the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales two weeks before acute hospitalisation, on admission to and discharge from geriatric rehabilitation, and three months after discharge from geriatric rehabilitation.ResultsA total of 618 rehabilitation patients were included in our analysis. For each of the two scales, three distinct functional performance trajectories were identified by latent class growth modelling: poor at baseline and 3-month follow-up (remained poor: ADL, 6.6% of patients; IADL, 42%), good at baseline but poor recovery (deteriorated: ADL, 33%; IADL, 20%), and good at baseline and good recovery (recovered: ADL, 60%; IADL, 35%). Higher Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (v recovered, per point: odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% CI, 1.64-3.84) and cognitive impairment (OR, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.09-19.1) were associated with greater likelihood of remaining poor in ADL, and also with deterioration (CFS score: OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.45-2.13; cognitive impairment: OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.24-2.82). Higher CFS score (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.37-1.97) and cognitive impairment (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.31-5.61) were associated with remaining poor in IADL, and higher CFS score was also associated with deterioration (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-1.99).ConclusionsBased on ADL assessments, most people who underwent inpatient geriatric rehabilitation regained their baseline functional performance. As higher CFS score and cognitive impairment were associated with poorer functional recovery, assessing frailty and cognition at hospital admission could assist intervention and discharge planning.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationships between baseline nutritional status, medical events (MEs), and rehabilitation outcomes in individuals undergoing inpatient rehabilitation (IR).DesignA retrospective single center cohort study.SettingAn IR ward.ParticipantsThis study included 409 patients (mean age, 80 years; men, 170 [42%]) undergoing IR for hospital-associated deconditioning, neurologic disorders, or musculoskeletal diseases. Participants were grouped according to the Controlling Nutritional Status score at admission: normal nutrition (NN): 0 to 1, mild malnutrition (MM): 2 to 4, and moderate/severe malnutrition (M/SM): 5 to 12.InterventionsNone.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes included MEs leading to death or acute illness requiring transfer to other hospitals for specialized treatments. The secondary outcomes were the rehabilitation efficiency scores (changes in Functional Independence Measure [FIM] score divided by length of stay) for motor function (FIM-M) and cognitive function (FIM-C).ResultsAmong the 409 participants, 300 (73%) were malnourished at admission. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for MEs in the MM and M/SM groups relative to the NN group were 1.48 (0.67-3.27) and 0.98 (0.34-2.81), respectively. No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in FIM-M efficiency scores (mean ± SD, NN: 0.49±0.51 vs MM: 0.41±0.57 vs M/SM: 0.44±1.06, P=.7) or FIM-C efficiency scores (0.04±0.06 vs 0.04±0.06 vs 0.08±0.4, P=0.1). Analysis of covariance showed no significant association between MM or M/SM group and FIM-M efficiency score (beta coefficient = -0.038, P=.6; beta coefficient = 0.15, P=.1, respectively) or FIM-C efficiency score (beta coefficient = 0.004, P=.8; beta coefficient = 0.047, P=.08, respectively).ConclusionNo significant associations were observed between the baseline nutritional status and MEs, FIM-M efficiency score, or FIM-C efficiency score in individuals undergoing IR.