Dataset Information

Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Estimation of the oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is promising but requires systematic evaluation. Extraction of OEF-related information from the tissue residue function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) has also been proposed. In this study, whole-brain OEF repeatability was investigated, as well as the relationships between QSM-based OEF and DSC-MRI-based parameters, i.e., mean transit time (MTT) and an oxygen extraction index, referred to as apparent OEF (AOEF).

Method

Test-retest data were obtained from 20 healthy volunteers at 3 T. QSM maps were reconstructed from 3D gradient-echo MRI phase data, using morphology-enabled dipole inversion. DSC-MRI was accomplished using gradient-echo MRI at a temporal resolution of 1.24 s.

Results

The whole-brain QSM-based OEF was (40.4±4.8) % and, in combination with a previously published cerebral blood flow (CBF) estimate, this corresponds to a cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen level of CMRO₂ = 3.36 ml O₂/min/100 g. The intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] for OEF test-retest data was 0.73. The MTT-versus-OEF and AOEF-versus-OEF relationships showed correlation coefficients of 0.61 (p = 0.004) and 0.52 (p = 0.019), respectively.

Discussion

QSM-based OEF showed a convincing absolute level and good test-retest results in terms of the ICC. Moderate to good correlations between QSM-based OEF and DSC-MRI-based parameters were observed. The present results constitute an indicator of the level of robustness that can be achieved without applying extraordinary resources in terms of MRI equipment, imaging protocol, QSM reconstruction, and OEF analysis.

SUBMITTER: Wirestam R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9801129 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Wirestam Ronnie R Lundberg Anna A Chakwizira Arthur A van Westen Danielle D Knutsson Linda L Lind Emelie E

Heliyon 20221216 12

<h4>Background</h4>Estimation of the oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is promising but requires systematic evaluation. Extraction of OEF-related information from the tissue residue function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) has also been proposed. In this study, whole-brain OEF repeatability was investigated, as well as the relationships between QSM-based OEF and DSC-MRI-based parameters, i.e., mean tran ...[more]

PMID: 36590544

Similar Datasets

Project description:SignificanceThe Ohio Contrast Cards are a repeatable test of contrast sensitivity, and they reveal higher contrast sensitivity for low-vision patients than is shown by the Pelli-Robson chart.PurposeThis study aimed to compare the contrast sensitivity results and test/retest ±limits of agreement for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart on two challenging groups of participants, and to compare the Ohio Contrast Card results with grating acuity and the Pelli-Robson results with letter acuity.MethodsThe Ohio Contrast Card and Pelli-Robson tests were each performed twice by two different examiners within one visit on 40 elder patients in Primary Vision Care (>65 years old) and 23 to 27 low-vision school-aged students. Grating acuity was measured using the Teller Acuity Cards (all participants), and letter acuity was measured using ClearChart (elders) or the Bailey-Lovie chart (students).ResultsThe ±95% limits of agreement were similar for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson chart. The elders' limits of agreement were ±0.27 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.28 (Pelli-Robson); the students' limits of agreement were ±0.42 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.51 (Pelli-Robson). However, Ohio Contrast Card results were 0.41 log10 Michelson units more sensitive than the Pelli-Robson chart (over one line on the Pelli-Robson chart) for the elders and 0.90 log10 Michelson units (three lines on the Pelli-Robson chart) more sensitive for the elders (0.11 and 0.6 log10 Weber units, respectively). The Pelli-Robson results were correlated with letter acuities and Ohio Contrast Card results for both groups, and the Ohio Contrast Card results were correlated with Teller Acuity Card acuities for the elders.ConclusionsThe Ohio Contrast Cards and Pelli-Robson chart are similarly repeatable. Both contrast sensitivity tests can provide additional clinical information that is not available through visual acuity testing, and Ohio Contrast Card may provide additional information not available from the Pelli-Robson chart.

Project description:ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the different brain oxygen metabolism statuses in preeclampsia using magnetic resonance imaging and investigate the factors that affect cerebral oxygen metabolism in preeclampsia.Materials and methodsForty-nine women with preeclampsia (mean age 32.4 years; range, 18-44 years), 22 pregnant healthy controls (PHCs) (mean age 30.7 years; range, 23-40 years), and 40 non-pregnant healthy controls (NPHCs) (mean age 32.5 years; range, 20-42 years) were included in this study. Brain oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) values were computed using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) plus quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent magnitude-based OEF mapping (QSM + quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent imaging or QQ) obtained with a 1.5-T scanner. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to investigate the differences in OEF values in the brain regions among the groups.ResultsAmong the three groups, the average OEF values were significantly different in multiple brain areas, including the parahippocampus, multiple gyri of the frontal lobe, calcarine, cuneus, and precuneus (all P-values were less than 0.05, after correcting for multiple comparisons). The average OEF values of the preeclampsia group were higher than those of the PHC and NPHC groups. The bilateral superior frontal gyrus/bilateral medial superior frontal gyrus had the largest size of the aforementioned brain regions, and the OEF values in this area were 24.2 ± 4.6, 21.3 ± 2.4, and 20.6 ± 2.8 in the preeclampsia, PHC, and NPHC groups, respectively. In addition, the OEF values showed no significant differences between NPHC and PHC. Correlation analysis revealed that the OEF values of some brain regions (mainly involving the frontal, occipital, and temporal gyrus) were positively correlated with age, gestational week, body mass index, and mean blood pressure in the preeclampsia group (r = 0.361-0.812).ConclusionUsing whole-brain VBM analysis, we found that patients with preeclampsia had higher OEF values than controls.

Project description:Empirical studies reporting low test-retest reliability of individual blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data have resurrected interest among cognitive neuroscientists in methods that may improve reliability in fMRI. Over the last decade, several individual studies have reported that modeling decisions, such as smoothing, motion correction and contrast selection, may improve estimates of test-retest reliability of BOLD signal estimates. However, it remains an empirical question whether certain analytic decisions consistently improve individual and group level reliability estimates in an fMRI task across multiple large, independent samples. This study used three independent samples (Ns: 60, 81, 120) that collected the same task (Monetary Incentive Delay task) across two runs and two sessions to evaluate the effects of analytic decisions on the individual (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(3,1)]) and group (Jaccard/Spearman rho) reliability estimates of BOLD activity of task fMRI data. The analytic decisions in this study vary across four categories: smoothing kernel (five options), motion correction (four options), task parameterizing (three options) and task contrasts (four options), totaling 240 different pipeline permutations. Across all 240 pipelines, the median ICC estimates are consistently low, with a maximum median ICC estimate of .44 - .55 across the three samples. The analytic decisions with the greatest impact on the median ICC and group similarity estimates are the Implicit Baseline contrast, Cue Model parameterization and a larger smoothing kernel. Using an Implicit Baseline in a contrast condition meaningfully increased group similarity and ICC estimates as compared to using the Neutral cue. This effect was largest for the Cue Model parameterization, however, improvements in reliability came at the cost of interpretability. This study illustrates that estimates of reliability in the MID task are consistently low and variable at small samples, and a higher test-retest reliability may not always improve interpretability of the estimated BOLD signal.

Dataset Information

Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Background

Method

Results

Discussion

Publications

Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets