Dataset Information

Bioimpedance-Derived Membrane Capacitance: Clinically Relevant Sources of Variability, Precision, and Reliability.

ABSTRACT: Membrane capacitance (C_M), a bioimpedance-derived measure of cell membrane health, has been suggested as an indicator of health status. However, there are few published data to support its use in clinical settings. Hence, this study evaluated clinically relevant sources of variation, precision, and reliability of C_M measurements. This longitudinal study included 60 premenopausal women. Sources of variability (e.g., demographics, body composition, serum measures, diet) were identified by stepwise regression. Precision and reliability were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and technical error of the measurement (TEM) for intra-day (30 min apart) and inter-day measurements (7-14 days apart). Body composition, temperature, and metabolic activity were identified as sources of variability. C_M measurements had high precision (CV = 0.42%) and high reliability for intra-day (ICC = 0.996) and inter-day (ICC = 0.959) measurements, independent of menstrual cycle and obesity status. Our results showed that C_M measurements are sensitive to clinical factors and have high precision and reliability. The results of this study suggest that C_M is sufficiently reliable for health status monitoring in conditions with variation in body composition, metabolic activity, or body temperature among premenopausal women.

SUBMITTER: Garr Barry V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9819400 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Bioimpedance-Derived Membrane Capacitance: Clinically Relevant Sources of Variability, Precision, and Reliability.

Garr Barry Valene V Chiang Jasmine L JL Bowman Kaylan G KG Johnson Kristina D KD Gower Barbara A BA

International journal of environmental research and public health 20221230 1

Membrane capacitance (C<sub>M</sub>), a bioimpedance-derived measure of cell membrane health, has been suggested as an indicator of health status. However, there are few published data to support its use in clinical settings. Hence, this study evaluated clinically relevant sources of variation, precision, and reliability of C<sub>M</sub> measurements. This longitudinal study included 60 premenopausal women. Sources of variability (e.g., demographics, body composition, serum measures, diet) were ...[more]

PMID: 36613010

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesAddressing traumatic brain injury (TBI) heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as essential for therapy translation given the long history of failed clinical trials. We evaluated differential effects of a promising treatment (glibenclamide) based on dose, TBI type (patient selection), and imaging endophenotype (outcome selection). Our goal to inform TBI precision medicine is contextually timely given ongoing phase 2/planned phase 3 trials of glibenclamide in brain contusion.DesignBlinded randomized controlled preclinical trial of glibenclamide on MRI endophenotypes in two established severe TBI models: controlled cortical impact (CCI, isolated brain contusion) and CCI+hemorrhagic shock (HS, clinically common second insult).SettingPreclinical laboratory.SubjectsAdult male C57BL/6J mice (n = 54).InterventionsMice were randomized to naïve, CCI±HS with vehicle/low-dose (20 μg/kg)/high-dose glibenclamide (10 μg/mouse). Seven-day subcutaneous infusions (0.4 μg/hr) were continued.Measurements and main resultsSerial MRI (3 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr, and 7 d) measured hematoma and edema volumes, T2 relaxation (vasogenic edema), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, cellular/cytotoxic edema), and 7-day T1-post gadolinium values (blood-brain-barrier [BBB] integrity). Linear mixed models assessed temporal changes. Marked heterogeneity was observed between CCI versus CCI+HS in terms of different MRI edema endophenotypes generated (all p < 0.05). Glibenclamide had variable impact. High-dose glibenclamide reduced hematoma volume ~60% after CCI (p = 0.0001) and ~48% after CCI+HS (p = 4.1 × 10-6) versus vehicle. Antiedema benefits were primarily in CCI: high-dose glibenclamide normalized several MRI endophenotypes in ipsilateral cortex (all p < 0.05, hematoma volume, T2, ADC, and T1-post contrast). Acute effects (3 hr) were specific to hematoma (p = 0.001) and cytotoxic edema reduction (p = 0.0045). High-dose glibenclamide reduced hematoma volume after TBI with concomitant HS, but antiedema effects were not robust. Low-dose glibenclamide was not beneficial.ConclusionsHigh-dose glibenclamide benefitted hematoma volume, vasogenic edema, cytotoxic edema, and BBB integrity after isolated brain contusion. Hematoma and cytotoxic edema effects were acute; longer treatment windows may be possible for vasogenic edema. Our findings provide new insights to inform interpretation of ongoing trials as well as precision design (dose, sample size estimation, patient selection, outcome selection, and Bayesian analysis) of future TBI trials of glibenclamide.

Project description:BackgroundThe utility of glycemic index (GI) values for chronic disease risk management remains controversial. Although absolute GI value determinations for individual foods have been shown to vary significantly in individuals with diabetes, there is a dearth of data on the reliability of GI value determinations and potential sources of variability among healthy adults.ObjectiveWe examined the intra- and inter-individual variability in glycemic response to a single food challenge and methodologic and biological factors that potentially mediate this response.DesignThe GI value for white bread was determined by using standardized methodology in 63 volunteers free from chronic disease and recruited to differ by sex, age (18-85 y), and body mass index [BMI (in kg/m2): 20-35]. Volunteers randomly underwent 3 sets of food challenges involving glucose (reference) and white bread (test food), both providing 50 g available carbohydrates. Serum glucose and insulin were monitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curve (AUC) methods. Biochemical variables were measured by using standard assays and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.ResultsThe mean ± SD GI value for white bread was 62 ± 15 when calculated by using the recommended method. Mean intra- and interindividual CVs were 20% and 25%, respectively. Increasing sample size, replication of reference and test foods, and length of blood sampling, as well as AUC calculation method, did not improve the CVs. Among the biological factors assessed, insulin index and glycated hemoglobin values explained 15% and 16% of the variability in mean GI value for white bread, respectively.ConclusionsThese data indicate that there is substantial variability in individual responses to GI value determinations, demonstrating that it is unlikely to be a good approach to guiding food choices. Additionally, even in healthy individuals, glycemic status significantly contributes to the variability in GI value estimates. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01023646.

Project description:The distribution of pathogenic Legionella in the environmental soil and water of China has not been documented yet. In this study, Legionella was detected in 129 of 575 water (22.43%) and 41 of 442 soil samples (9.28%) by culture. Twelve Legionella species were identified, of which 11 were disease-associated. Of the Legionella-positive samples, 109 of 129 (84.50%) water and 29 of 41 (70.73%) soil were positive for L. pneumophila, which accounted for about 75% of Legionella isolates in both water and soil, suggesting L. pneumophila was the most frequent species. Soil showed a higher diversity of Legionella spp. as compared with water (0.6279 versus 0.4493). In contrast, serogroup (sg) 1 was more prevalent among L. pneumophila isolates from water than from soil (26.66% versus 12.21%). Moreover, many disease-associated sequence types (STs) of L. pneumophila were found in China. Intragenic recombination was acting on L. pneumophila from both water and soil. Phylogeny, population structure, and molecular evolution analyses revealed a probable existence of L. pneumophila isolates with a special genetic background that is more adaptable to soil or water sources and a small proportion of genetic difference between water and soil isolates. The detection of viable, clinically relevant Legionella demonstrates soil as another source for harboring and dissemination of pathogenic Legionella bacteria in China. Future research should assess the implication in public health with the presence of Legionella in the soil and illustrate the genetic and pathogenicity difference of Legionella between water and soil, particularly the most prevalent L. pneumophila. IMPORTANCE Pathogenic Legionella spp. is the causative agent of Legionnaires' disease (LD), and L. pneumophila is the most common one. Most studies have focused on L. pneumophila from water and clinical samples. However, the soil is another important reservoir for this bacterium, and the distribution of Legionella spp. in water and soil sources has not been compared and documented in China yet. Discovering the distribution of Legionella spp. and L. pneumophila in the two environments may help a deep understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular evolution of the bacterium. Our research systematically uncovered the distributions of Legionella spp. in different regions and sources (e.g., water and soil) of China. Moreover, phylogeny, population structure, and molecular evolution study revealed the possible existence of L. pneumophila with a special genetic background that is more adaptable to soil or water sources, and genetic difference may exist.

Dataset Information

Bioimpedance-Derived Membrane Capacitance: Clinically Relevant Sources of Variability, Precision, and Reliability.

Publications

Bioimpedance-Derived Membrane Capacitance: Clinically Relevant Sources of Variability, Precision, and Reliability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets