Double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cheskes S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9907872 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation.
Cheskes Sheldon S McLeod Shelley S Scales Damon C DC
Intensive care medicine 20230208 4
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundDouble Sequential External Defibrillation (DSED) is a proposed treatment strategy for patients in refractory VF (RVF) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Defibrillator damage employing DSED is a theoretical concern expressed by defibrillator manufacturers yet the incidence of damage during resuscitation remains unknown.ObjectiveWe sought to explore the incidence of defibrillator damage employing DSED for RVF during OHCA.MethodsWe conducted a survey of EMS agencies, authors of previous publications, EMS medical directors, base hospital medical oversight groups, and defibrillator manufacturers to assess the incidence of defibrillator damage during DSED. Our survey focused on the frequency of DSED use, number of shocks used during DSED, technique used to employ DSED (simultaneous or sequential), and the incidence of defibrillator damage during DSED. We specifically targeted groups that were known to be using DSED in clinical practice.ResultsOur survey response rate was 50% (65/129): 61% (34/56) EMS medical directors, 60% (6/10) authors, 100% (8/8) base hospitals, 33% (1/3) defibrillator manufacturers, 31% (16/52) paramedic services. In our case-based analysis the overall incidence of defibrillator damage was 0.4%. The incidence of defibrillator damage based on total number of DSED shocks was estimated between 0.11% and 0.22%. All reported cases of defibrillator damage occurred using a simultaneous defibrillation technique.ConclusionWhen DSED is employed using either a sequential or simultaneous technique the rate of defibrillator damage appears to be exceedingly low. Further high-quality evidence is required to determine the impact of DSED on patient centered outcomes, but the incidence of defibrillator damage should not limit it use. Defibrillator damage should continue to be monitored in future trials and clinical practice.
| S-EPMC9464949 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDespite high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation, and antiarrhythmic medications, some patients remain in refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These patients have worse outcomes compared to patients who respond to initial treatment. Double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) and vector change (VC) defibrillation have been proposed as viable options for patients in refractory VF. However, the evidence supporting the use of novel defibrillation strategies is inconclusive. The objective of this study is to compare two novel therapeutic defibrillation strategies (DSED and VC) against standard defibrillation for patients with treatment refractory VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Research questionAmong adult (≥ 18 years) patients presenting in refractory VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does DSED or VC defibrillation result in greater rates of survival to hospital discharge compared to standard defibrillation?MethodsThis will be a three-arm, cluster randomized trial with repeated crossover conducted in six regions of Ontario, Canada (Peel, Halton, Toronto, Simcoe, London, and Ottawa), over 3 years. All adult (≥ 18 years) patients presenting in refractory VF (defined as patients presenting in VF/pVT and remaining in VF/pVT after three consecutive standard defibrillation attempts during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology will be treated by one of three strategies: (1) continued resuscitation using standard defibrillation, (2) resuscitation involving DSED, or (3) resuscitation involving VC (change of defibrillation pads from anterior-lateral to anterior-posterior pad position) defibrillation. The primary outcome will be survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes will include return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), VF termination after the first interventional shock, VF termination inclusive of all interventional shocks, and number of defibrillation attempts to obtain ROSC. We will also perform an a priori subgroup analysis comparing rates of survival for those who receive "early DSED," or first DSED shock is shock 4-6, to those who receive "late DSED," or first DSED shock is shock 7 or later.DiscussionA well-designed randomized controlled trial employing a standardized approach to alternative defibrillation strategies early in the treatment of refractory VF is urgently required to determine if the treatments of DSED or VC defibrillation impact clinical outcomes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04080986 . Registered on 6 September 2019.
| S-EPMC7689391 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundShocks near defibrillation threshold (nDFT) strength commonly extinguish all ventricular fibrillation (VF) wavefronts, but a train of rapid, well-organized postshock activations (PAs) typically appears before sinus rhythm ensues. If one of the PA waves undergoes partial propagation block (wavebreak), reentry may be induced, causing VF to reinitiate and the shock to fail.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether wavebreak leading to VF reinititation following nDFT shocks occurs preferentially at the right ventricular insertion (RVI), which previous studies have identified as a key site for wavebreak.MethodsWe used panoramic optical mapping to image the ventricular epicardium of 6 isolated swine hearts during nDFT defibrillation episodes. After each experiment, the hearts were fixed and their geometry scanned with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI and mapping datasets were spatially coregistered. For failed shocks, we identified the site of the first wavebreak of a PA wave during VF reinitiation.ResultsWe recorded 59 nDFT failures. In 31 of these, the first wavebreak event occurred within 1 cm of the RVI centerline, most commonly on the anterior side of the right ventricular insertion (aRVI) (23/31). The aRVI region occupies 16.8% ± 2.5% of the epicardial surface and would be expected to account for only 10 wavebreaks if they were uniformly distributed. By χ2 analysis, aRVI wavebreaks were significantly overrepresented.ConclusionThe anterior RVI is a key site in promoting nDFT failure. Targeting this site to prevent wavebreak could convert defibrillation failure to success and improve defibrillation efficacy.
| S-EPMC8169561 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveDouble sequential external defibrillation (DSED) and vector-change defibrillation (VCD) have been suggested to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) refractory of standard defibrillation (SD). Therefore, this network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of DSED, VCD, and SD for refractory VF.MethodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through November 15th, 2022. R software netmeta and netrank package (R version 4.2.0) and meta-insight software were used to pool dichotomous outcomes using odds ratio (OR) presented with the corresponding confidence interval (CI). Our protocol was prospectively published in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022378533.ResultsWe included seven studies with a total of 1632 participants. DSED was similar to SD in survival to hospital discharge (OR: 1.14 with 95% CI [0.55, 2.83]), favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2 or cerebral performance category ≤2) (OR: 1.35 with 95% CI [0.46, 3.99]), and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (OR: 0.81 with 95% CI [0.43; 1.5]). In addition, VCD was similar to SD in survival to hospital discharge (OR: 1.12 with 95% CI [0.27, 4.57]), favorable neurological outcome (OR: 1.01 with 95% CI [0.18, 5.75]), and ROSC (OR: 0.88 with 95% CI [0.24; 3.15]).ConclusionDouble sequential external defibrillation and VCD were not associated with enhanced outcomes in patients with refractory VF out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, compared to SD. However, the current evidence is still inconclusive, warranting further large-scale RCTs.
| S-EPMC10475889 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cardiac arrest in an event of acute myocardial infarction most commonly results in life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Patients who remain in VF despite optimal epinephrine, amiodarone, and three or more attempts at 200 joules of biphasic current defibrillation are known to be in an electrical storm. Here, we describe a case of defibrillation refractory VF responding to intravenous esmolol resulting in a successful return of spontaneous circulation. Learning objective. This case reinforces the growing body of evidence supporting esmolol as a novel treatment approach for refractory VF before the cessation of resuscitative efforts.
| S-EPMC7251428 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundUnderstanding the mechanisms that drive ventricular fibrillation is essential for developing improved defibrillation techniques to terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF). Distinct organization patterns of chaotic, regular, and synchronized activity were previously demonstrated in VF that persisted over 1 to 2 minutes (long-duration VF [LDVF]). We hypothesized that activity on the endocardium may be driving these activation patterns in LDVF and that unsuccessful defibrillation shocks may alter activation patterns.Methods and resultsThe study was performed using a 64-electrode basket catheter on the left ventricle endocardium and 54 6-electrode plunge needles inserted into the left ventricles of 6 dogs. VF was induced electrically, and after short-duration VF (10 seconds) and LDVF (7 minutes), shocks of increasing strengths were delivered every 10 seconds until VF was terminated. Endocardial activation patterns were classified as chaotic (varying cycle lengths and nonsynchronous activations), regular (highly repeatable cycle lengths), and synchronized (activation that spreads rapidly over the endocardium with diastolic periods between activations).ConclusionsThe results showed that the chaotic pattern was predominant in early VF, but the regular pattern emerges as VF progressed. The synchronized pattern only emerged occasionally during late VF. Failed defibrillation shocks changed chaotic and regular activation patterns to synchronized patterns in LDVF but not in short-duration VF. The regular and synchronized patterns of activation were driven by rapid activations on the endocardial surface that blocked and broke up transmurally, leading to an endocardial to epicardial activation rate gradient as LDVF progressed.
| S-EPMC5737741 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimAmplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) and Median Slope (MS) are ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform measures that predict defibrillation shock success. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) obscures electrocardiograms and must be paused for analysis. Studies suggest waveform measures better predict subsequent shock success when combined with prior shock success. We determined whether this relationship applies during CPR.MethodsAMSA and MS were calculated from 5-second pre-shock segments with and without CPR, and compared to logistic models combining each measure with prior return of organized rhythm (ROR).ResultsVF segments from 692 patients were analyzed during CPR before 1372 shocks and without CPR before 1283 shocks. Combining waveform measures with prior ROR increased areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for AMSA/MS with CPR (0.66/0.68 to 0.73/0.74, p<0.001) and without CPR (0.71/0.72 to 0.76/0.76, p<0.001).ConclusionsPrior ROR improves prediction of shock success during CPR, and may enable waveform measure calculation without chest compression pauses.
| S-EPMC5776045 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundExternal defibrillators are used for arrhythmia cardioversion and for defibrillating during cardiac arrest. During defibrillation, short-duration biphasic pulses cause intense motion due to rapid chest-wall muscle contraction. A reduced motion external defibrillator (RMD) was constructed by integrating a commercial defibrillator with a Tetanizing-waveform generator. A long-duration, low-amplitude, tetanizing waveform slowly stimulated the chest musculature before the biphasic pulse, reducing muscle contraction during the shock.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate RMD defibrillation in swine for subject motion during defibrillation pulses and for defibrillation effectiveness. RMD defibrillation can reduce the duration of arrhythmia ablation therapy or simplify cardioversion procedures.MethodsThe tetanizing unit delivered a triangular 1-kHz pulse of 0.25- to 2.0-second duration and 10- to 100-V peak amplitude, subsequently triggering the conventional defibrillator to output standard 1- to 200-J energy biphasic pulses at the next R wave. Forward limb motion was evaluated by measuring peak acceleration and limb work during RMD (tetanizing + biphasic) or biphasic pulse-only waveforms at 10-3-second sampling rate. Seven swine were arrested electrically and subsequently defibrillated. Biphasic pulse-only and RMD defibrillations were repeated 25-35 times per swine, varying tetanizing parameters and biphasic pulse energy. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were established by measuring the minimum energy required to restore sinus rhythm with biphasic pulse-only or RMD defibrillations.ResultsTwo forward-limb acceleration peaks occurred during both the tetanizing waveform and biphasic pulse, indicating rapid and slower nociceptic (pain sensation) nerve fiber activation. Optimal RMD tetanizing parameters (25-35 V, 0.25- to 0.75-second duration), relative to biphasic pulse-only defibrillations, resulted in 74% ± 10% smaller peak accelerations and 85% ± 10% reduced limb work. DFT energies were identical when comparing RMD to biphasic pulse-only defibrillations.ConclusionRelative to conventional defibrillations, RMD defibrillations maintain rhythm restoration efficiency with drastically reduced subject motion.
| S-EPMC9250595 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has recently been recommended for selected patients with favorable prognostic features. We aimed to identify factors affecting the willingness of emergency physicians to implement extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We conducted a factorial survey with nine experimental vignettes by combining three different scene time intervals and transportation time intervals. Emergency physicians reported willingness to implement ECPR (1-100 points). Respondent characteristics that could affect the willingness were studied. Multilevel analysis of vignettes and respondent factors was conducted using a mixed-effects regression model. We obtained 486 vignette responses from 54 emergency physicians. In the case of longer scene time intervals, there was a significant difference in the willingness scores at 9 and 12 min transportation time intervals. When the pre-hospital time interval was > 40 min, emergency physicians demonstrated lower willingness to implement ECPR. Clinical experience of 15-19 years showed a significant favorable effect on willingness to implement extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, the mean willingness scores of EPs for ECMO implementation were more than 75 across all vignettes. In ECPR, the prehospital time interval is an important factor, and the willingness of emergency physicians to implement ECMO could be mutually affected by scene time intervals, transportation time intervals, and total prehospital time.
| S-EPMC9879451 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6034480 | biostudies-literature