Dataset Information

Lung Transplantation From Controlled and Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Donors With Long Ischemic Times Managed by Simple Normothermic Ventilation and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion Assessment.

ABSTRACT: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are still subject of studies. In this prospective cohort trial, we compared outcomes after lung transplantation (LT) of subjects receiving lungs from DCD donors with those of subjects receiving lungs from donation after brain death (DBD) donors (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02061462). Lungs from DCD donors were preserved in-vivo through normothermic ventilation, as per our protocol. We enrolled candidates for bilateral LT ≥14 years. Candidates for multi-organ or re-LT, donors aged ≥65 years, DCD category I or IV donors were excluded. We recorded clinical data on donors and recipients. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were: duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). 121 patients (110 DBD Group, 11 DCD Group) were enrolled. 30-day mortality and CLAD prevalence were nil in the DCD Group. DCD Group patients required longer MV (DCD Group: 2 days, DBD Group: 1 day, p = 0.011). ICU length of stay and PGD3 rate were higher in DCD Group but did not significantly differ. LT with DCD grafts procured with our protocols appears safe, despite prolonged ischemia times.

SUBMITTER: Palleschi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9945516 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Lung Transplantation From Controlled and Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Donors With Long Ischemic Times Managed by Simple Normothermic Ventilation and <i>Ex-Vivo</i> Lung Perfusion Assessment.

Palleschi Alessandro A Zanella Alberto A Citerio Giuseppe G Musso Valeria V Rosso Lorenzo L Tosi Davide D Fumagalli Jacopo J Bonitta Gianluca G Benazzi Elena E Lopez Gianluca G Rossetti Valeria V Morlacchi Letizia Corinna LC Uslenghi Clarissa C Cardillo Massimo M Blasi Francesco F Grasselli Giacomo G Valenza Franco F Nosotti Mario M

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation 20230208

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are still subject of studies. In this prospective cohort trial, we compared outcomes after lung transplantation (LT) of subjects receiving lungs from DCD donors with those of subjects receiving lungs from donation after brain death (DBD) donors (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02061462). Lungs from DCD donors were preserved <i>in-vivo</i> through normothermic ventilation, as per our protocol. We enrolled candidates for bilateral LT ≥14 years. Candidates for multi- ...[more]

PMID: 36846600

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDonation after circulatory death (DCD) heart procurement has increased, but concerns remain about the effect of simultaneous heart and lung procurement, particularly with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP), on the use of DCD lungs. Previous analyses exclude critical donor factors and organ nonuse, and rapidly rising DCD use may bias comparisons to historical controls.ObjectiveTo use validated risk-adjusted models to assess whether DCD heart procurement via TA-NRP and direct procurement is associated with lung use.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study involved adult DCD donors between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2024, listed in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). The SRTR deceased donor yield model was used to develop an observed to expected (O:E) yield ratio of lung use obtained through DCD among 4 cohorts: cardiac DCD donors vs noncardiac DCD donors and cardiac DCD donors undergoing TA-NRP vs direct procurement. Temporal trends in O:E ratios were analyzed with the Cochran-Armitage test.Main outcomes and measuresThe O:E ratios of DCD lung use.ResultsAmong 24 431 DCD donors (15 878 [65.0%] male; median [IQR] age, 49.0 [37.0-58.0] years), 22 607 were noncardiac DCD (14 375 [63.6%] male; median [IQR] age, 51.0 [39.0-58.0] years) and 1824 were cardiac DCD (1503 [82.4%] male; median [IQR] age, 32.0 [26.0-38.0] years) donors; noncardiac DCD donors were more likely to be smokers (6873 [30.4%] vs 227 [12.4%]; P < .001). Among cardiac DCD donors, 325 underwent TA-NRP, while 712 underwent direct procurement. TA-NRP donors had shorter median (IQR) lung ischemic times (6.07 [4.38-9.56] hours vs 8.12 [6.16-12.00] hours; P < .001) and distances to recipient hospitals (222 [9-626] nautical miles vs 331 [159-521] nautical miles; P = .050) than direct procurement donors. Lung use was higher among cardiac DCD donations compared with noncardiac DCD donations (16.7% vs 4.4%, P < .001). Within the cardiac DCD cohort, lung use was similar between TA-NRP and direct procurement (19.1% vs 18.7%; P = .88) cohorts. Both noncardiac DCD and cardiac DCD donors had observed lung yields greater than expected (O:E, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.35] and 1.79 [95% CI, 1.62-1.96]; both P < .001), although cardiac DCD yield was significantly higher than noncardiac DCD yield (P < .001). Both TA-NRP and direct procurement lung yields were greater than expected (O:E, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.60-2.43] and 1.77 [95% CI, 1.52-1.99]; both P < .001) but were not significantly different from each other (P = .83). The O:E ratios did not change significantly over time across all cohorts. Among recipients, the TA-NRP cohort experienced significantly better 90-day mortality (0 of 62 vs 9 of 128 patients [7.0%]; P = .03) and overall survival (4 of 62 patients [6.5%] vs 21 of 128 patients [16.4%]; P = .04) rates compared with the direct procurement cohort.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of DCD donors, concomitant heart procurement provided better-than-expected rates of lung use as assessed with validated O:E use ratios regardless of procurement technique. The findings also suggest a survival benefit with improved 90-day and overall survival rates for the TA-NRP cohort compared with the direct procurement cohort. Policies should be developed to maximize the benefits of these donations.

Project description:RationaleTo address the lung donor shortage, we obtained institutional review board and US Food and Drug Administration approval to transplant lungs recovered from uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death donors (uDCDDs).ObjectivesTo compare outcomes of recipients of lungs recovered from uDCDDs vs. brain-dead donors.MethodsAfter consent and screening, lungs recovered from uDCDDs were assessed by 4 hours ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and computed tomography (CT) scan.Measurements and main resultsOver the course of 29 months, 502 potential uDCDDs younger than 66 years were identified in a single county, with death declaration by emergency medical services and four emergency departments in this and two other countries. We determined reasons that lungs from these uDCDDs were not able to be transplanted: uDCDDs could not have lungs recovered (224), next-of-kin could not be found or refused to discuss (67), next-of-kin refused (48), medical examiner case (39), logistics/missed (35), and miscellaneous (35). There were 247 medical contraindications: 141 pulmonary and 106 nonpulmonary. Lungs were recovered from 31 uDCDDs. Thirteen lungs did not have EVLP: 5 injured lungs (one pulmonary embolism [PE] with perforated infarct, two motor vehicle crash with severe injuries, one adhesion, and one lightning strike), two large PE, two prolonged ischemic time, two obvious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, one technical, and one consent withdrawn. Eighteen lungs had EVLP: 10 with immediate edema (three PE, three unknown down time, three long ischemic time, and one ruptured aneurysm into L pleural space, making long cardiopulmonary resuscitation ineffective), and one myocarditis, possible lung involvement. In three lungs, CT showed edema after EVLP: one poor flush and poor EVLP performance, one edema after myocardial infarction (MI) with 10-year history of chronic heart failure, and one edema with MI, resuscitated, arrested again. One concurrent pneumonia was diagnosed by bronchoscopy, CT, and cultures; one patient had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with small subpleural blebs and poor collapse, confirmed by CT. Two uDCDDs with MIs were suitable but not transplanted: no consented recipient from one large blood type B uDCDD, and the senior surgeon was unavailable to transplant suitable lungs from a uDCDD and did not allow the transplant.ConclusionsThe objective was not met: no lungs from uDCDDs were transplanted. uDCDDs can be a source of lungs for transplant. Resolving logistical challenges and better use of first-person authorization, allowing organ recovery without next-of-kin consent or knowledge of death, could increase yield. Donor medical problems were higher than expected and may limit the effect of uDCDDs on the lung donor pool.Clinical trial registrationNCT01615484.

Project description:BackgroundNormothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of liver grafts donated after circulatory death (DCD) has shown promise in large animal and clinical trials. Following procurement, initial flush with a cold preservation solution is the standard of care. There is concern that initial cooling followed by warming may exacerbate liver injury, and the optimal initial flush temperature has yet to be identified. We hypothesize that avoidance of the initial cold flush will yield better quality liver grafts.MethodsTwenty-four anaesthetized pigs were withdrawn from mechanical ventilation and allowed to arrest. After 60-minutes of warm ischemia to simulate a DCD procurement, livers were flushed with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) at 4°C, 25°C or 35°C (n = 4 per group). For comparison, an adenosine-lidocaine crystalloid solution (AD), shown to have benefit at warm temperatures in heart perfusions, was also used (n = 4 per group). During 12-hours of NMP, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), lactate, transaminase levels, and histological injury were determined. Bile production and hemodynamics were monitored continuously.ResultsATP levels recovered substantially following 1-hour of NMP reaching pre-ischemic levels by the end of NMP with no difference between groups. There was no difference in peak aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Portal vein resistance was lowest in the 4°C group reaching significance after 2 hours (0.13 CI -0.01,0.277, p = 0.025). Lactate levels recovered promptly with no difference between groups. Comparison to AD groups showed no statistical difference in the abovementioned parameters. On electron microscopy the HTK4°C group had the least edema with mean cell thickness of 2.92μm (p = 0.41) while also having the least sinusoidal dilatation with a mean diameter of 5.36μm (p = 0.04). For AD, the 25°C group had the lowest mean cell thickness at 3.14μm (p = 0.09).ConclusionsAvoidance of the initial cold flush failed to demonstrate added benefit over standard 4°C HTK in this DCD model of liver perfusion.

Dataset Information

Lung Transplantation From Controlled and Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Donors With Long Ischemic Times Managed by Simple Normothermic Ventilation and Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion Assessment.

Publications

Lung Transplantation From Controlled and Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Donors With Long Ischemic Times Managed by Simple Normothermic Ventilation and <i>Ex-Vivo</i> Lung Perfusion Assessment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets