Ondansetron to reduce neonatal opioid withdrawal severity a randomized clinical trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To determine if treatment with a 5-HT3 antagonist (ondansetron) reduces need for opioid therapy in infants at risk for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).Study design
A multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial of ninety (90) infants. The intervention arms were intravenous ondansetron or placebo during labor followed by a daily dose of ondansetron or placebo in infants for five days.Results
Twenty-two (49%) ondansetron-treated and 26 (63%) placebo-treated infants required pharmacologic treatment (p > 0.05). The Finnegan score was lower in the ondansetron-treated group (4.6 vs. 5.6, p = 0.02). A non-significant trend was noted for the duration of hospitalization. There was no difference in need for phenobarbital or clonidine therapy, or total dose of morphine in the first 15 days of NOWS treatment.Conclusions
Ondansetron treatment reduced the severity of NOWS symptoms; and there was an indication that it could reduce the length of stay.Clinical trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01965704.
SUBMITTER: Peltz G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9968817 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Ondansetron to reduce neonatal opioid withdrawal severity a randomized clinical trial.
Peltz Gary G Jansson Lauren M LM Adeniyi-Jones Susan S Cohane Carol C Drover David D Shafer Steven S Wang Meiyue M Wu Manhong M Govindaswami Balaji B Jegatheesan Priya P Argani Cynthia C Khan Salwa S Kraft Walter K WK
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association 20220827 3
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if treatment with a 5-HT3 antagonist (ondansetron) reduces need for opioid therapy in infants at risk for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).<h4>Study design</h4>A multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial of ninety (90) infants. The intervention arms were intravenous ondansetron or placebo during labor followed by a daily dose of ondansetron or placebo in infants for five days.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-two (49%) ondansetron-trea ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Ondansetron is an anti-emetic 5-HT3 receptor antagonist being investigated for treating neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Sparse PK data were analyzed from a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial with 98 mother/neonate dyads. Pregnant women with opioid use disorder were randomized to receive either placebo or ondansetron 8 mg intravenously within 4 h of delivery. Neonates born to mothers who were randomized to ondansetron received 0.07 mg/kg orally once every 24 h for up to five doses. Using current PK data, model parameters from a two-compartmental structural model from the literature (i.e., a priori model) were updated with the Metropolis-Hastings Markov-chain Monte Carlo estimation algorithm in NONMEM. The updated Bayesian model indicated a slower absorption rate (KA) but no differences in model parameters (CL, V, V2, Q) after including body weight and postmenstrual age. Sensitivity analyses on CL prior revealed statistical improvement favoring larger body weights, but not changes in postmenstrual age. However, further model development using larger body weights did not illustrate superior performance through visual inspection of diagnostic plots. Overall, a cumulative AUC of at least 1000 ng*h/mL appears to be the threshold for reductions in symptom severity. Exposure-response analyses suggest the total number of doses to be the primary driver for efficacy with respect to AUC, which reasonably aligns with the literature. Overall, it is suggested that at least three doses of the current oral ondansetron regimen are required to reduce symptom severity in neonates.
| S-EPMC11811511 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:Individuals taking opioids for an extended period of time may become physically dependent, and will therefore experience opioid withdrawal should they stop taking the medication. Previous work in animal and human models has shown that the serotonin (5-HT3) receptor may be implicated in opioid withdrawal. In this study, we investigated if ondansetron, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, could reduce the symptoms of opioid withdrawal after chronic opioid exposure in humans. METHODS:In this double-blinded, randomized, crossover study, 33 chronic back pain patients (N = 33) were titrated onto sustained-release oral morphine for 30 days. After titration, participants attended 2 study sessions, 1 week apart, in which opioid withdrawal was induced with intravenous naloxone, with or without 8 mg intravenous ondansetron pretreatment. Opioid withdrawal symptoms were assessed by a blinded research assistant (objective opioid withdrawal score [OOWS]) and by the research participant (subjective opioid withdrawal score [SOWS]). RESULTS:Clinically significant signs of withdrawal were observed during both the ondansetron (ΔOOWS = 3.58 ± 2.22, P < 0.0001; ΔSOWS = 12.48 ± 11.18, P < 0.0001) and placebo sessions (ΔOOWS = 3.55 ± 2.39, P < 0.0001; ΔSOWS = 12.21 ± 10.72, P < 0.0001), but no significant differences were seen between the treatment sessions in either the OOWS or SOWS scores. CONCLUSION:We hypothesized that ondansetron would reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms in human subjects, but found no difference in withdrawal severity between ondansetron and placebo sessions. These findings suggest that more investigation may be necessary to determine if 5-HT3-receptor antagonists are suitable treatment options for opioid withdrawal.
| S-EPMC5610060 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceOpioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health problem. Supervised withdrawal (ie, detoxification) from opioids using clonidine or buprenorphine hydrochloride is a widely used treatment.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether tramadol hydrochloride extended-release (ER), an approved analgesic with opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of action and low abuse potential, is effective for use in supervised withdrawal settings.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized clinical trial was conducted in a residential research setting with 103 participants with OUD. Participants' treatment was stabilized with morphine, 30 mg, administered subcutaneously 4 times daily. A 7-day taper using clonidine (n = 36), tramadol ER (n = 36), or buprenorphine (n = 31) was then instituted, and patients were crossed-over to double-blind placebo during a post-taper period. The study was conducted from October 25, 2010, to June 23, 2015.Main outcomes and measuresRetention, withdrawal symptom management, concomitant medication utilization, and naltrexone induction. Results were analyzed over time and using area under the curve for the intention-to-treat and completer groups.ResultsOf the 103 participants, 88 (85.4%) were men and 43 (41.7%) were white; mean (SD) age was 28.9 (10.4) years. Buprenorphine participants (28 [90.3%]) were significantly more likely to be retained at the end of the taper compared with clonidine participants (22 [61.1%]); tramadol ER retention was intermediate and did not differ significantly from that of the other groups (26 [72.2%]; χ2 = 8.5, P = .01). Time-course analyses of withdrawal revealed significant effects of phase (taper, post taper) for the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score (taper mean, 5.19 [SE, .26]; post-taper mean, 3.97 [SE, .23]; F2,170 = 3.6, P = .03) and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) score (taper mean,8.81 [SE, .40]; post-taper mean, 4.14 [SE, .30]; F2,170 = 15.7, P < .001), but no group effects or group × phase interactions. Analyses of area under the curve of SOWS total scores showed significant reductions (F2,159 = 17.7, P < .001) in withdrawal severity between the taper and post-taper periods for clonidine (taper mean, 13.1; post-taper mean, 3.2; P < .001) and tramadol ER (taper mean, 7.4; post-taper mean, 2.8; P = .03), but not buprenorphine (taper mean, 6.4; post-taper mean, 7.4). Use of concomitant medication increased significantly (F2,159 = 30.7, P < .001) from stabilization to taper in the clonidine (stabilization mean, 0.64 [SE, .05]; taper mean, 1.54 [SE, .10]; P < .001) and tramadol ER (stabilization mean, 0.53 [SE, .05]; taper mean, 1.19 [SE, .09]; P = .003) groups and from stabilization to post taper in the buprenorphine group (stabilization mean, 0.46 [SE, .05] post-taper mean, 1.17 [SE, .09]; P = .006), suggesting higher withdrawal for those groups during those periods. Naltrexone initiation was voluntary and the percentage of participants choosing naltrexone therapy within the clonidine (8 [22.2%]), tramadol ER (7 [19.4%]), or buprenorphine (3 [9.7%]) groups did not differ significantly (χ2 = 2.5, P = .29).Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this trial suggest that tramadol ER is more effective than clonidine and comparable to buprenorphine in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms during a residential tapering program. Data support further examination of tramadol ER as a method to manage opioid withdrawal symptoms.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01188421.
| S-EPMC5710234 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeuromodulation is a promising approach for opioid discontinuation, as not all patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) seek pharmacotherapy. The NET Device is a non-invasive, battery-powered, portable, device that provides bilateral, transcranial, transcutaneous, alternating current stimulation (tACS) for patients experiencing opioid withdrawal. This clinical trial prospectively evaluated whether NET Device utilization is effective for persons with OUD undergoing opioid discontinuation without medications for OUD (MOUD).MethodsThis randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted at a single residential treatment center. Persons with OUD undergoing opioid discontinuation were assigned to active or sham device treatment. Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) total scores were measured prior to and during device use. We tested whether active stimulation would produce a clinically meaningful (≥15%) decrease in COWS score from baseline to 1-hr post-stimulation, compared to sham.Results108 participants (55 sham, 53 active; 59.3% male, 89.8% white; 71.3% fentanyl-positive) form the intent-to-treat dataset. Mean ( ± 1 SD) COWS score in the active device group decreased from baseline (18.1 + 4.4) to 1-hr (7.0 + 4.1); this 61.3% decrease (d=2.14) exceeded the pre-specified 15% criterion. COWS scores decreased more for active (-11.1 ± 5.2) than sham (-8.8 ± 6.3), p<.05, d=-.41. A higher proportion of participants in active vs. sham showed ≥15% reduction in COWS (98.1% vs. 83.6%), p=.016. Device utilization was longer for active than sham, 43.9 + 46.2 vs. 30.0 + 39.2 hours, p=.008, and fewer participants requested MOUD (26% vs. 49%, p<0.02).ConclusionThe NET Device is effective, safe and well-tolerated for reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms. This device received FDA market clearance in May 2024.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04916600.
| S-EPMC11880230 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal is increasing in both Canada and the United States. However, the degree to which the treatment of pain with opioids, rather than the misuse of prescription opioids or heroin, contributes to the prevalence of neonatal opioid withdrawal remains unknown.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional study between 1992 and 2011 in Ontario with 2 objectives. First, we determined the annual incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Second, using data from a subset of women eligible for publicly funded prescription drugs, we determined what proportion of women who deliver an infant with neonatal abstinence syndrome were given a prescription for an opioid before and during pregnancy.ResultsThe incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome in Ontario increased 15-fold during the study period, from 0.28 per 1000 live births in 1992 to 4.29 per 1000 live births in 2011. During the final 5 years of the study, we identified 927 deliveries of infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome to mothers who were public drug plan beneficiaries. Of these mothers, 67% had received an opioid prescription in the 100 days preceding delivery, including 53.3% who received methadone, an increase from 28.6% in the interval spanning 1 to 2 years before delivery (p < 0.001). Prescription for nonmethadone opioids decreased from 38% to 17% (p < 0.001).InterpretationThe incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal in Ontario has increased substantially over the last 20 years. Most of the women in this cohort who delivered an infant with neonatal abstinence syndrome had received a prescription for an opioid both before and during their pregnancy.
| S-EPMC4382031 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the severity of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in infants prenatally exposed to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI).MethodsA prospective cohort included 148 maternal-infant pairs categorized into MOUD (n = 127) and MOUD + SRI (n = 27) groups. NOWS severity was operationalized as the infant's need for pharmacologic treatment with opioids, duration of hospitalization, and duration of treatment. The association between prenatal SRI exposure and the need for pharmacologic treatment (logistic regression), time-to-discharge, and time-to-treatment discontinuation (Cox proportional hazards modeling) was examined after adjusting for the type of maternal MOUD, use of hydroxyzine, other opioids, benzodiazepines/sedatives, alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, gestational age, and breastfeeding.ResultsInfants in the MOUD + SRI group were more likely to receive pharmacologic treatment for NOWS (OR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.31; 9.76) and had a longer hospitalization (median: 11 vs. 6 days; HR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33; 0.89) compared to the MOUD group. With respect to time-to-treatment discontinuation, no association was observed in infants who received treatment (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.32); however, significant differences were observed in the entire sample (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.89).ConclusionsUse of SRIs among pregnant women on MOUD might be associated with more severe NOWS.ImpactA potential drug-drug interaction between maternal SRIs and opioid medications that inhibit the reuptake of serotonin has been hypothesized but not carefully evaluated in clinical studies. Results of this prospective cohort indicate that the use of SRIs among pregnant women on MOUD is associated with more severe neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. This is the first prospective study which carefully examined effect modification between the type of maternal MOUD and SRI use on neonatal outcomes. This report lays the foundation for treatment optimization in pregnant women with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.
| S-EPMC9128601 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of maternal opioid use in the USA has increased substantially since 2000. As a consequence of opioid use during pregnancy, the incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has increased fivefold between 2002 and 2012. Pharmacological therapy is indicated when signs of NOWS cannot be controlled, and the objective of pharmacological therapy is to control NOWS signs. Once pharmacologic therapy has started, there is great variability in strategies to wean infants. An important rationale for studying weaning of pharmacological treatment for NOWS is that weaning represents the longest time interval of drug treatment. Stopping medications too early may not completely treat NOWS symptoms.MethodsThis will be a pragmatic, randomized, blinded trial of opioid weaning to determine whether more rapid weaning, compared to slow wean, will reduce the number of days of opioid treatment in infants receiving morphine or methadone as the primary treatment for NOWS.DiscussionThe proposed study is a pragmatic trial to determine whether a rapid-weaning intervention reduces the number of days of opioid treatment, compared to a slow-weaning intervention, and we powered the proposed study to detect a 2-day difference in the length of treatment. Hospitals will be able to use either morphine or methadone with the knowledge that we may find a positive treatment effect for both, one, or neither drugs.Trial registrationNCT04214834. Registered January 2, 2020.
| S-EPMC10362592 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prenatal opioid exposure (POE) is commonly associated with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), which is characterized by a broad variability in symptoms and severity. Currently there are no diagnostic tools to reliably predict which infants will develop severe NOWS, while risk stratification would allow for proactive decisions about appropriate clinical monitoring and interventions. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess if extracellular microRNAs (miRNAs) in umbilical cord plasma of infants with POE could predict NOWS severity. Participants (n = 58) consisted of pregnant women receiving medications for opioid use disorder and their infants. NOWS severity was operationalized as the need for pharmacologic treatment and prolonged hospitalization (≥ 14 days). Cord blood miRNAs were assessed using semi-quantitative qRT-PCR arrays. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated. The expression of three miRNAs (miR-128-3p, miR-30c-5p, miR-421) predicted need for pharmacologic treatment (AUC: 0.85) and prolonged hospitalization (AUC: 0.90). Predictive validity improved after two miRNAs (let-7d-5p, miR-584-5p) were added to the need for pharmacologic treatment model (AUC: 0.94) and another two miRNAs (let-7b-5p, miR-10-5p) to the prolonged hospitalization model (AUC: 0.99). Infant cord blood extracellular miRNAs can proactively identify opioid-exposed neonates at high-risk for developing severe NOWS.
| S-EPMC8993911 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) is a significant public health issue and while millions of neonates are affected each year, an optimal pharmacologic weaning protocol has yet to be demonstrated. In this study, we compare hospital length of stay (LOS) and length of treatment (LOT) for treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal (NOWS) with morphine versus methadone.MethodsThis was a single-site, open-label, randomized controlled pilot study conducted from October 2016-September 2018. Infants were eligible if their primary in-utero drug exposure was heroin, oral opioids, or methadone and they were born at greater than or equal to 34 weeks gestation. Infants were excluded for serious medical comorbidities and primary in-utero exposure to buprenorphine.ResultsSixty-one infants were enrolled; 30 were randomized to methadone treatment, and 31 to morphine treatment. Overall 46% of infants required treatment for NOWS. LOS and LOT for infants treated with morphine was 17.9 days and 14.7 days respectively, compared to 16.1 days and 12.8 days for babies treated with methadone (p = 0.5, p = 0.54). Infants treated with morphine received lower total morphine equivalents than those treated with methadone (9.7 vs. 33, p < 0.01). Three treated infants in the methadone group required transfer to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, versus no infants in the morphine group.ConclusionsInfants treated with morphine versus methadone had no significant differences in LOS or LOT in this pilot study. Infants treated with methadone received up to 3 times the opioid based on morphine equivalents as infants treated with morphine and had more transfers to the NICU for over sedation.Clinical trial registrationMorphine Versus Methadone for Opiate Exposed Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome NCT02851303 , initiated 01/08/2016.
| S-EPMC9202148 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the safety and efficacy of lofexidine for treating opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) and facilitating completion of opioid withdrawal.MethodsA multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 18 US centers from June 2013 to December 2014. Participants (n = 603) aged ≥18 years, dependent on short-acting opioids, and seeking withdrawal treatment, randomized 3:3:2 to receive lofexidine 2.88 mg/d (n = 222), lofexidine 2.16 mg/d (n = 230), or placebo (n = 151) for 7 days. Primary outcome was the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale of Gossop (SOWS-Gossop) scores rating withdrawal symptoms over days 1 to 7.ResultsParticipants were of mean age, 35 years; 71% male. Pairwise differences in overall SOWS-Gossop log-transformed least squares means were statistically significant for lofexidine 2.16 mg (difference, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.04; P = 0.02) and 2.88 mg (-0.26; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.09; P = 0.003) compared with placebo. Fewer than half of participants in both groups completed the study. Completion rates for lofexidine 2.16 mg (41.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.85; P = 0.007) and 2.88 mg (39.6%; OR, 1.71; P = 0.02) were significantly better compared with placebo (27.8%). Overall adverse event (AE) rates were similar across groups. Common AEs for lofexidine included orthostatic hypotension, hypotension, and bradycardia, but resulted in few study discontinuations.ConclusionsLofexidine 2.16 mg and 2.88 mg significantly reduced symptoms of OWS versus placebo, and increased absolute rates of completing the 7-day study by 14% and 12%, respectively (a relative increase of 85% and 71%). Data suggest that lofexidine is a generally safe and effective nonopioid treatment for opioid withdrawal. Lofexidine could serve as a withdrawal treatment option when a nonopioid agent is preferred or required, when agonist-assisted withdrawal is unavailable, when agonist discontinuation caused OWS, and during induction into maintenance treatment with opioid agonists or antagonists.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01863186.
| S-EPMC6541556 | biostudies-literature