Dataset Information

Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dead-space fraction) or mechanical power (MP; affected, e.g., by changes in lung-thorax compliance).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate VR and MP in the late stages of the disease when patients are ready to be liberated from the ventilator after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia compared to respiratory failures of other etiologies.

Design

A retrospective observational cohort study of 249 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients with and without COVID-19-related respiratory failure.

Methods

We analyzed each group's VR and MP distributions and trajectories [repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)] during weaning. Secondary outcomes included weaning failure rates between groups and the ability of VR and MP to predict weaning outcomes (using logistic regression models).

Results

The analysis compared 53 COVID-19 cases with a heterogeneous group of 196 non-COVID-19 subjects. VR and MP decreased across both groups during weaning. COVID-19 patients demonstrated higher values for both indexes throughout weaning: median VR 1.54 versus 1.27 (p < 0.01) and MP 26.0 versus 21.3 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at the start of weaning, and median VR 1.38 versus 1.24 (p < 0.01) and MP 24.2 versus 20.1 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at weaning completion. According to the multivariable analysis, VR was not independently associated with weaning outcomes, and the ability of MP to predict weaning failure or success varied with lung-thorax compliance, with COVID-19 patients demonstrating consistently higher dynamic compliance along with significantly fewer weaning failures (9% versus 30%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

COVID-19 patients differed considerably in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics among prolonged ventilated individuals, demonstrating significantly higher VRs and MP. The differences in MP were linked with higher lung-thorax compliance in COVID-19 patients, possibly contributing to the lower rate of weaning failures observed.

SUBMITTER: Ghiani A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9971705 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients <i>versus</i> respiratory failures of other etiologies.

Ghiani Alessandro A Tsitouras Konstantinos K Paderewska Joanna J Kahnert Kathrin K Walcher Swenja S Gernhold Lukas L Neurohr Claus C Kneidinger Nikolaus N

Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 20230101

<h4>Background</h4>Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dead-space fraction) or mechanical power (MP; affected, e.g., by changes in lung-thorax compliance).<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate VR and MP in the late stages of the dis ...[more]

PMID: 36846917

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe patient's neuro-respiratory drive, measured as electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), quantifies the mechanical load on the respiratory muscles. It correlates with respiratory effort but requires a dedicated esophageal catheter. Transcutaneous (surface) monitoring of respiratory muscle electromyographic (sEMG) signals may be considered a suitable alternative to EAdi because of its non-invasive character, with the additional benefit that it allows for simultaneously monitoring of other respiratory muscles. We therefore sought to study the neuro-respiratory drive and timing of inspiratory muscles using sEMG in a cohort of children enrolled in a pediatric ventilation liberation trial. The neuro-mechanical coupling, relating the pressure generated by the inspiratory muscles to the sEMG signals of these muscles, was also calculated.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized cross-over trial in ventilated patients aged < 5 years. sEMG recordings of the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscles (ICM), esophageal pressure tracings and ventilator scalars were simultaneously recorded during continuous spontaneous ventilation and pressure controlled-intermittent mandatory ventilation, and at three levels of pressure support. Neuro-respiratory drive, timing of diaphragm and ICM relative to the mechanical ventilator's inspiration and neuro-mechanical coupling were quantified.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were included (median age: 5.9 months). In response to decreasing pressure support, both amplitude of sEMG (diaphragm: p = 0.001 and ICM: p = 0.002) and neuro-mechanical efficiency indices increased (diaphragm: p = 0.05 and ICM: p < 0.001). Poor correlations between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort were found, with R2: 0.088 [0.021-0.152].ConclusionssEMG allows for the quantification of the electrical activity of the diaphragm and ICM in mechanically ventilated children. Both neuro-respiratory drive and neuro-mechanical efficiency increased in response to lower inspiratory assistance. There was poor correlation between neuro-respiratory drive and respiratory effort.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05254691. Registered 24 February 2022, registered retrospectively.

Project description:ImportanceEarly observations suggested that COVID-19 pneumonia had a higher mortality rate than other causes of pneumonia.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes between mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia due to COVID-19 (March 2020 to June 2021) and other etiologies (July 2016 to December 2019).Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Johns Hopkins Healthcare System among adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation in the first 2 weeks of hospitalization. Clinical, laboratory, and mechanical ventilation data were extracted from admission to hospital discharge or death.ExposuresPneumonia due to COVID-19.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was 90-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were time to liberation from mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, static respiratory system compliance, and ventilatory ratio. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression, proportional hazards regression, and doubly robust regression were used in propensity score-matched sets to compare clinical outcomes.ResultsOverall, 719 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [15.3] years; 442 [61.5%] were male; 460 [64.0%] belonged to a minoritized racial group and 253 [35.2%] were White) with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and 1127 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [15.8] years; 586 [52.0%] were male; 459 [40.7%] belonged to a minoritized racial group and 655 [58.1%] were White) with severe non-COVID-19 pneumonia. In unadjusted analyses, patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had higher 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.41), longer time on mechanical ventilation (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81), and lower compliance (32.0 vs 28.4 mL/kg PBW/cm H2O; P < .001) when compared with those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. In propensity score-matched analyses, patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were equally likely to die within 90 days as those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.35; P = .85), had similar respiratory system compliance (mean difference, 1.82 mL/cm H2O; 95% CI, -1.53 to 5.17 mL/cm H2O; P = .28) and ventilatory ratio (mean difference, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.11; P = .52), but had lower rates of liberation from mechanical ventilation (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.00) when compared with those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had somewhat lower rates of being discharged from the hospital alive at 90 days (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.01) than those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia; however, this was not statistically significant.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia had similar mortality rates as patients with other causes of severe pneumonia but longer times to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation use in COVID-19 pneumonia should follow the same evidence-based guidelines as for any pneumonia.