Dataset Information

A Novel Strategy for Preparation of ADSCs-Osteogenic Microtissues Based on CEFFE and Mechanisms for Enhancing Osteogenic Activity

ABSTRACT: Bone tissue engineering is considered the optimal solution for the repair of large bone defects. Previous studies by our team have demonstrated the effectiveness of a "bottom-up" microtissue engineering strategy using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to improve the utilization efficiency of seed cells. However, this strategy requires the extraction of bone marrow, which is associated with significant trauma and difficulties in obtaining the cells. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs), obtained from aspirated adipose tissue, offer a less invasive and more accessible alternative, but their osteogenic capacity is noticeably weaker, severely limiting their application as seed cells in bone tissue engineering repair.Cell-free fat extract (CEFFE) is a cell-free liquid component extracted from adipose tissue, which exhibits beneficial properties such as promoting proliferation, antioxidation, anti-apoptosis, and angiogenesis. In this study, during the preparation of ADSC-based osteogenic microtissues, we first discovered that CEFFE significantly enhanced the osteogenic activity of ADSCs. Furthermore, we observed the formation of dense osteogenic membranes as early as day 7 of osteogenic induction. When the microtissues based on CEFFE-treated ADSCs were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice, we found a significant enhancement in their osteogenic activity. Finally, to further investigate the mechanism underlying the enhancement of ADSC osteogenic differentiation by CEFFE, we performed transcriptomic analysis of CEFFE-treated ADSCs and validated the activation of the key PI3K-Akt pathway using Western blotting.In conclusion, this study presents a novel approach for the preparation of ADSC-based osteogenic microtissues using CEFFE and provides insights into the mechanisms underlying the enhancement of osteogenic activity. These findings hold significant implications for the field of bone tissue engineering and offer potential advancements in the clinical translation of ADSC-based therapies.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE235305 | GEO | 2023/08/09

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The treatment of bone defects caused by infection, trauma or neoplasms remains a clinical challenge. Autologous bone transplantation is limited by availability, donor site morbidity and surgical risk factors. This has given rise to stromal/stem-cell based therapy. Bone marrow derived stromal cells (BMSCs) have been studied to a large extent and show high regenerative potential but their use is limited by availability, donor site morbidity and the relatively low cell yield as they represent only <0.1% of cell harvested from bone marrow aspirate. At the same time, they are the closest mesenchymal stromal cells for bone tissue engineering given their tissue origin and, unlike other mesenchymal stromal cells, can support the formation of hematopoietic marrow. Adipose tissue derived stromal cells (ASCs) as part of the stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue can as well undergo osteogenic differentiation but can be additionally isolated in a sufficient quantity from lipoaspirate after liposuction of abundant subcutaneous fat tissue. Here, it has been shown that there are no major differences in regard to proliferation or differentiation capacity of ASCs derived from subcutaneous fat of different anatomical regions. It has been shown that BMSCs are more prone to senescence during expansion and passage than ASCs and that ageing impacts proliferative capabilities of BMSCs more than that of ASCs while it has also been reported that osteogenic differentiation capacity is least impacted by age. Multiple studies have compared the characteristics of these two mesenchymal stromal cells in regard to bone tissue engineering in vitro. Most studies point to inferior extracellular matrix mineralization and lower expression of key osteogenic transcription markers like Runx2 in osteogenic differentiated ASCs compared to BMSCs. On the other hand, a study by Rath et al. found contrary results using particular culturing conditions like 3D bioglass scaffolds. An intraindividual comparison of human MSCs of three donors cultured on decellularized porcine bone confirmed superior osteogenic capacity of BMSCs compared to ASCs. In contrast to BMSCs, ASCs were not able to induce heterogenic ossification in a mouse model. In a sheep tibia defect model application of BMSCs resulted in a significantly higher amount of newly formed bone tissue. Importantly, Osteogenic differentiated ASCs do not support the formation of a hematopoietic marrow. Proteomics enables large-scale analysis of proteins present in a cell type and can be used to identify differentially regulated key proteins in a comparative approach. A comparative proteomic analysis of BMSCs and ASCs by Roche et al. in 2009 identified 556 proteins with 78% of these not being differentially regulated between these two cell populations, regarded as high similarity. Another comparative proteomic study of 2016 by Jeon et al. found 90 differentially regulated proteins out of 3000 total identified proteins. Both studies do not specify a number of different tissue donors and in part using cell lines. Looking for differences upon osteogenic differentiation, transcriptomic comparison of osteogenic differentiated porcine ASCs and BMSCs has been performed, resulting in 21 differentially expressed genes after 21 days of osteogenic culture conditions. Still, it remains unanswered, which are the key distinctive features of osteogenic differentiated ASCs and BMSCs at protein level that might help address the abovementioned weaknesses of ASCs in bone tissue engineering/regeneration for translational research. To overcome this need, an intraindividual comparative DIA based proteomic analysis of osteogenic differentiated human BMSC and ASCs was performed in this study.

Project description:Adipogenesis occurs through a specific gene program in undifferentiated fat progenitors. We hypothesized that the properties of the fat progenitors are regulated by hox genes, the developmental genes essential in different tissue stem cells. Their biased expression in white and brown fat implies roles in distinguishing the two fat types. Among 39 Hox genes, Hoxc8 is highly enriched in undifferentiated adipose tissue stem cells (ADSCs) and down-regulated in differentiated adipocytes. Forced expression of Hoxc8 suppressed adipocyte differentiation of ADSCs. Using microarrays, we investigated the effect of Hoxc8 overexpression on global transcripts in ADSCs. We compared among four groups: untreated ADSCs, adipogenic induction media (MDI)-treated ADSCs, MDI-treated ADSC-vector and MDI-treated ADSC-Hoxc8. A number of, but not all, adipogenesis-related genes are suppressed by Hoxc8. This dataset illustrates the global effect of Hoxc8, a developmental transcription factor, on the expression of adipogenesis-related genes. Gene expression was compared among untreated ADSCs (control), adipogenic induction media-treated ADSCs, adipogenic induction media-treated ADSC-vector (ADSCs transduced with control vector), and adipogenic induction media-treated ADSC-Hoxc8 (ADSCs transduced with human Hoxc8). Total RNA was isolated from ADSCs using the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen). At NimbleGen, quality and yield were verified before cDNA synthesis and Cy3-end labeling. The labeled cDNA samples were hybridized to Homo sapiens 4-Plex arrays (Roche NimbleGen, A4487001-00-01) that represent 24,000 human genes. Raw data files for each sample were normalized and background-corrected using a Robust Multi-Array Analysis as implemented by NimbleScan software. Students’ two-tail t-tests were conducted among the samples for each transcript and fold-change was determined. Transcripts whose abundance was significantly altered (P < 0.05) and an absolute fold change greater than 2 were defined as differentially regulated.

Dataset Information

A Novel Strategy for Preparation of ADSCs-Osteogenic Microtissues Based on CEFFE and Mechanisms for Enhancing Osteogenic Activity

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure