Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Improving DNA extraction from ancient bones

ABSTRACT: Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJEB10532 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Minimally Destructive DNA Extraction from Ancient Teeth

Project description:A Minimally Destructive Protocol for DNA Extraction from Ancient Teeth

| PRJEB32750 | ENA

Protein Extraction from Ancient Teeth and Dental Calculus Compatible with Subsequent DNA Extraction

Project description:Dental calculus is becoming a crucial material in the study of past populations, with increasing interest in its proteomic and genomic content. Here we suggest further development of protocol for analysis of ancient proteins and a combined approach for subsequent ancient DNA extraction. We tested the protocol on recent teeth. We then applied the optimised protocol to ancient teeth to limit the destruction of calculus, as it is a precious and irreplaceable source of dietary, microbiological, and ecological information in the archaeological context. Finally, the applicability of the protocol was proven on samples of ancient calculus.

2023-09-11 | PXD042668 | Pride

Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4472031 | biostudies-literature

An improved protein extraction method

Project description:three protein extraction methods were used for cotton leaves protein extraction, and LC-MS/MS analyses of total proteins obtained from cotton leaves.

2019-01-28 | PXD012517 | iProX

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

extraction of soil microbiome

Project description:A comparative study of several methods for extraction of soil microbiome

| PRJEB20466 | ENA

extraction of soil microbiome

Project description:A comparative study of several methods for extraction of soil microbiome

| PRJEB20467 | ENA

A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bones.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC102752 | biostudies-literature

No ancient pathogen DNA in petrous bones

Project description:Ancient pathogen DNA in human teeth and petrous bones

| PRJEB24937 | ENA

Extraction of Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins using three extraction methods

Project description:Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins are important players in the parasite’s pathogenicity. However, most of the proteins have not been identified. This study reports the membrane proteins extracted using three extractions methods: two commercial kits (ProteoExtract® from Calbiochem and ProteoPrep® from Sigma), and a conventional laboratory method. The resulting membrane fractions (MF) and cytosolic fractions (CF)were analysed using LC-ESI-MS/MS. The proteins identified in at least two out of three biological replicates revealed a total of 490, 492, and 587 MF proteins extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Meanwhile, 487, 611 and 343 proteins were identified in the CF extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Analysis of the identified MF and CF proteins extracted by the respective extraction kits suggests that the ProteoPrep® extraction kit was the most selective in separating MF and CF among the three extraction methods.

2018-10-16 | PXD010171 | Pride

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data