Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Bacteria

ABSTRACT: Comparison of sequencing bias for library preparation kit

PROVIDER: PRJDB8030 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	DRR171212_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	DRR171212_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	DRR171213_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	DRR171213_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	DRR171214_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 250

Similar Datasets

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: synthetic equimolar pool

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. Using common sets of reference samples, we evaluated the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. As part of this larger study, we assessed sequencing bias and reproducibility using an equimolar pool of 1,152 small RNA sequences ranging from 15-90 nt, and primarily comprised of annotated human microRNAs. We observed extensive protocol-specific and sequence-specific bias that was largely mitigated in protocols employing sequencing adapters with randomized end-nucleotides. We find that sequencing bias is highly reproducible across labs using the same library preparation technologies, and use the data to calculate inter-protocol bias correction factors. These results provide strong evidence for the feasibility of reproducible cross-laboratory small RNA-seq studies, even those involving analysis of data generated using different protocols.

2018-07-09 | GSE94584 | GEO

Evaluation of three small RNA library preparation kits on serum-derived RNA

Project description:We evaluated the effect of the small RNA library preparation method on 5' tRNA-halves and miRNA abundance in libraries prepared from serum RNA using three commercially available small RNA library preparation kits (TruSeq small RNA library preparation kit v2 (Illumina), TailorMix miRNA sample preparation kit v2 (Seqmatic) and the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs)). RNA isolated from 100 µl of serum collected from healthy mice was used as input for the preparation of a small RNA library in duplicate and libraries were single end sequenced.

2017-02-22 | GSE88914 | GEO

Evaluating bias-reducing protocols for RNA sequencing library preparation

Project description:Evaluating bias-reducing protocols for RNA sequencing library preparation

| PRJEB6271 | ENA

RNA-seq profiling of trastuzumab or lapatinib sensitive and resistant SKBR3 breast cancer cells

Project description:RNAseq was done using Library protocol =Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Preparation Kit with poly(A) selection , HiSeq 101 Cycle Paired-End Sequencing v4

2018-11-30 | GSE114575 | GEO

Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Project description:We performed a parallel analysis of commonly used pre- and post-bisulfite WGBS library preparation protocols for their performance and quality of sequencing outputs. Our results show that bisulfite conversion per se generates pronounced sequencing biases, and subsequent fragmentation and amplification steps lead to several-fold overrepresentation of these artefacts. Standard pre-bisulfite library preparation methods lead to a significantly biased genomic sequence representation and a marked overestimation of methylation levels. We have integrated a bias diagnostic tool in the Bismark package and propose that amplification-free and post-bisulfite procedures should become the gold standard for WGBS library preparation.

2017-02-16 | GSE77961 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of DNA library preparation kits

| PRJNA769842 | ENA

2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings (Columbia ecotype)

Project description:Comparison of TopHat alignments and assessment of spurious splice junctions for 32nt and 76nt read lengths. Total RNA from 2-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) seedlings grown on MS plates was isolated using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit from Qiagen. To remove any contaminating DNA, RNA was treated with DNAse. Isolation of poly (A) mRNA and preparation of cDNA library were carried out using the Illumina TrueSeq RNA kit. Sequencing (72 cycle) was done on Illumina Genome Analyzer II.

2011-09-24 | GSE32318 | GEO

Characterization of human plasma-derived exosomal RNAs

Project description:Exosomes, endosome-derived membrane microvesicles, contain a specific set of RNA transcripts that are involved in cell-cell communication and hold a great potential as disease biomarkers. To systemically characterize exosomal RNA profiles, we performed RNA sequencing analysis using three human plasma samples and evaluated efficacies of small RNA library preparation protocols from 3 manufacturers. We tested the six samples (A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C1 and C2) using two small RNA library preparation kits: NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA library Prep Set from New England Biolab (NEB) and NEXTflex Small RNA Sequencing Kit from Bioo Scientific (BS). We also tested IlluminaM-bM-^@M-^Ys TrueSeq Small RNA Sample Preparation Kit (ILMN) in sample A1 and A2. Together, we tested these plasma samples by sequencing 14 indexed libraries. This study allowed direct comparison of current small RNA library preparation protocols and identified the most suitable strategy for future exosomal RNA sequencing analysis.

2013-05-15 | E-GEOD-45722 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparative evaluation of RNA-Seq library preparation methods for strand-specificity and low input

Project description:Library preparation is a key step in gene expression quantification. There are considerable advantages to both strand specific sequencing and the ability to sequence samples with very small amounts of starting material. Until recently there was no kit available that allowed both simultaneously. The standard Illumina-TruSeq stranded mRNA Sample Preparation kit requires abundant starting quantity while the Takara Bio-SMART-Seq® v4 Ultra® Low Input RNA kit allows for ultra low starting quantities but sacrifices strand specificity. Recently a kit that can do both, SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 - Pico Input Mammalian by Takara Bio, has become available. Evaluating the performance and effects of these sample preparation kits is a critical determinant for selecting the appropriate sequencing protocol, but a comprehensive comparison is currently missing. To address this we performed a detailed comparative analysis of sequencing libraries prepared with the three kits. We prepared a set of samples representing two experimental conditions with each kit, allowing for comparison of the kits in a standard realistic differential expression analysis. We find substantial differences in the levels of alignment and differential gene expression. Using differential expression analysis we show that using Pico results in identifying 55% less differentially expressed genes than TruSeq. Nevertheless, using gene pathway enrichment analysis we find similar results for all three kits, indicating that ultimately comparable functional results can be reached.

2019-09-17 | GSE124167 | GEO

Bulk RNA-sequencing of mouse prostate tumors initiated by transplantation of engineered organoids.

Project description:Purpose: Profile global expression of prostatic tumors to compare with published datasets. Methods: Prostate tumors were flash frozen followed by processed for total RNA using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Samples were submitted for polyA library preparation and bulk RNA-sequencing. Conclusions: Global gene expression profiling and comparison of prostate tumor genotypes suggests differential enrichment of neuroendocrine signatures that match established human neuroendocrine prostate cancer expression signatures.

2024-08-02 | GSE246251 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data