Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types

PROVIDER: PRJNA668323 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR12809400_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809400_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809500_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809500_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809401_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 260

Similar Datasets

Project description:Macroalgae samples for assessment of metagenomic DNA extraction with different extraction kits

| PRJNA1271329 | ENA

Project description:Environmental samples for assessment of metagenomic DNA extraction with different extraction kits

| PRJNA1183575 | ENA

Bacteria and eukaryotes

Project description:The study of DNA extraction kits

| PRJNA474064 | ENA

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

| PRJEB10820 | ENA

The assessment of differential expression in the hypothalamus following MMS

Project description:The hypothalamus was extracted from MMS and control groups immeadiately at the end of the paradigm on P6, RNA extraction done using Qiagen RNA/DNA extraction kits.

2021-06-01 | GSE147375 | GEO

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

human gut metagenome

Project description:Method assessment of fecal DNA extraction

| PRJDB6503 | ENA

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.

2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO

Project description:Benchmarking DNA extraction kits used in analyses of the urinary microbiome

| PRJNA662669 | ENA

Project description:Mu-DNA: a modular universal DNA extraction method adaptable for a wide range of sample types

| PRJNA473636 | ENA