Budding yeast cohesin (Mcd1) distribution in mitotically arrested cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SUBMITTER: Paul Megee
PROVIDER: E-GEOD-18021 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Publications
The Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loader determines the distribution of cohesin on budding yeast chromosomes.
Kogut Igor I Wang Jianbin J Guacci Vincent V Mistry Rohinton K RK Megee Paul C PC
Genes & development 20091001 19
Cohesins mediate sister chromatid cohesion and DNA repair and also function in gene regulation. Chromosomal cohesins are distributed nonrandomly, and their deposition requires the heterodimeric Scc2/Scc4 loader. Whether Scc2/Scc4 establishes nonrandom cohesin distributions on chromosomes is poorly characterized, however. To better understand the spatial regulation of cohesin association, we mapped budding yeast Scc2 and Scc4 chromosomal distributions. We find that Scc2/Scc4 resides at previously ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:The SMC protein complexes safeguard genomic integrity through their functions in chromosome segregation and repair. The chromosomal localization of the budding yeast Smc5/6 complex here determined reveals that the complex works specifically on the duplicated genome in differently regulated pathways. One controls the association to centromeres and chromosome arms in unchallenged cells, the second regulates the association to DNA breaks, and the third directs the complex to the chromosome arm that harbors the ribosomal DNA arrays. The chromosomal interaction pattern predicts a function that becomes more important with increasing chromosome length, and that the complex's role in unchallenged cells is independent of DNA damage. Additionally, localization of Smc6 to collapsed replication forks indicates an involvement in their rescue. Altogether this shows that the complex maintains genomic integrity in multiple ways, and evidence is presented that the Smc5/6 complex is needed during replication to prevent the accumulation of branched chromosome structures. Keywords: ChIP-chip analysis ⢠The goal of the experiment - Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. ⢠Keywords, for example, time course, cell type comparison, array CGH (the use of MGED ontology terms is recommended). Cell cycle, Double Strand Break Induction, time course after break induction, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chromosome VI array, Whole Genome Tiling Array, Smc5, Smc6, Nse1, Nse4, Nse5, Scc1, Scc2, Mre11, Rad53 ⢠Experimental factors Distribution of the Smc5/6 complex in the cell cycle, distribution of Smc5/6 complex before and after induction of a DNA double strand break on chromosome VI in G2/metaphase cells, distribution of Smc6 in the absence of functional Scc2, Mre11 or Rad53, distribution of Smc6 at collapsed replication forks, and distribution of Cohesin subunit Scc1 in G2/metaphase. Distribution was analyzed on Chromosome VI and/or whole genome arrays. Cells were grown in rich yeast cell extract media. All experiments were performed in cells with the same genetic background (Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303; ade2-1, trp1-1, can1-100, leu2-3, 112, his3-11, 15, ura3 RAD5) ⢠Experimental design ChIP analysis: In all cases, hybridization data for ChIP fraction was compared with that of SUP (supernatant) fraction. Cerevisiae chromosome VI array or Whole genome arrays were used. Total number of hybridization was 69. All description about hybridized samples is attached as the separate sheet. ⢠Quality control steps taken Duplication, confirmation using different tags, different subunits of the same complex, and time course after double-strand break induction. Checking of the ChIP fraction by Western blotting. Mock hybridisation of samples immunoprecipitated from cells containing no tag recognized by antibody used. ⢠Links to the publication, any supplemental websites or database accession numbers. http://tilingarray.bio.titech.ac.jp/smc56dsb Samples used, extract preparation and labelling: ⢠The origin of each biological sample Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303 (ade2-1, trp1-1, can1-100, leu2-3, 112, his3-11, 15, ura3 RAD5). ⢠Manipulation of biological samples and protocols used Strains containing flag-tagged versions of Smc6, Smc5, Nse1, Nse4, or Nse5 proteins were used. For synchronization in G1, alpha factor was added (Zymo research and Innovagen AB) at 3 µg/ml final concentrations to logarithmically growing cells, and G1 arrest was obtained at indicated temperatures for 2.5 h. For S-phase arrest, cells were grown to log phase and arrested in G1 with alpha factor for 2 h, and then incubated in the presence of 200 mM hydroxyurea (HU) (Sigma) for 30 min. Cells were then washed twice with rich medium containing 100µg/ml pronase (Calbiochem). Finally cells were resuspended in medium containing HU and pronase, and growth continued for indicated time periods. G2/M arrest was achieved 2.5 h after addition of benomyl (Sigma, 80µg/ml), to logarithmically growing cells. G1, S and G2/M arrests were checked microscopically and by FACS. DSBs were induced by activation of the HO endonuclease from the GAL1-10-promoter by addition of 2% galactose to cell cultures initially grown in 2% raffinose. ⢠Technical protocols for preparing the hybridization extract Extract preparation was processed following the Shirahige lab protocol (http://chromosomedynamics.bio.titech.ac.jp ). 5x108 cells were disrupted using Multi-Beads Shocker (MB400U, YASUI KIKAI, Osaka). Whole cell extract was sonicated to obtain 400-600 bp genomic DNA fragments. Anti-Flag monoclonal antibody M2 (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO) coupled to Dynabeads (Dynal, protein A Dynabeads) were used for chromatin immunoprecipitation. The immunprecipates were eluted and incubated over night at 65ºC to reverse the cross-link. Immunoprecipitated genomic DNA was incubated with proteinase K, extracted 2 times with phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol, precipitated, resuspended in TE and incubated with RnaseA. The DNA was then purified using the Qiagen PCR purification kit, and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. The DNA was amplified by PCR after random priming. 10 ug of amplified DNA was digested with Dnase I to a mean size of 100 bp. After Dnase I inactivation at 95ºC. DNA fragments were end-labeled by addition of 25 U of Terminal Transferase and 1 nmol Biotin-N6ddATP (NEN) for 1 hour at 37ºC as previously described by Winzeler et al. (Science. 281, 1194-1197, 1998). The entire sample was used for hybridization. ⢠Hybridization procedures and parameters: Hybridization, blocking and washing were carried out as previously described (http://chromosomedynamics.bio.titech.ac.jp). Each sample was hybridized to the array in 150 ul containing 6xSSPE; 0.005% TritonX-100; 15 ug fragmented denatured salmon sperm DNA (Gibco-BRL); 1 nmole 3'biotin labelled control oligonucleotide (oligo B2, Affymetrix). Samples were denatured at 100ºC for 10 minutes, and then put on ice before being hybridized for 16 hours at 42ºC in a hybridization oven (GeneChip Hybridization Oven 640, Affymetrix). Washing and scanning protocol provided by Affymetrix was performed automatically on a fluidics station (GeneChip fluidics station 450, Affymetrix). ⢠Measurement data and specifications: S. cerevisiae arrays were scanned using the Genechip Scanner3000 7G following the library array description. All the cel files data and processed data files can be downloaded from GEO database or from our Web sites. The primary analysis of tiling chip data was performed following exactly the statistical algorithm used for Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS). The detailed information for the algorithm used can be downloaded from the Affymetrix web site at http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/technotes/statistical_reference_guide.pdf. The analysis is available from K.S. on request. For the ChrVI array, one unit for analysis (locus) was set to 300bp and for whole genome arrays to 100bp. Fold change value, change p-value, and detection p-value for each locus were obtained by primary analysis. For the discrimination of positive and negative signals for the binding, we used three criteria as follows. First, the reliability of the signal strength was judged by detection p-value of each locus (p-value<=0.01 for chromosome VI and pvalue?0.0025 for whole genome array). Secondly, reliability of binding ratio was judged by change p-value (p-value<=0.01 for chromosome VI and p-value<=0.0025 for whole genome array). Thirdly, clusters consisting of at least 500bp contiguous loci that satisfied the above two criteria were selected, because it is known that a single site of protein-DNA interaction resulted in immuno-precipitation of DNA fragments that hybridized not only to the locus of the actual binding site but also to its neighbors. Under these conditions both types of arrays give essentially the same results for the binding profile. Repeated sequences were masked out and not included in the calculation of protein binding profile. The correlation coefficient of Smc6 binding profiles in G2/M from two independent experiments was 0.955, showing that the whole genome ChIP on chip data was reproducible. For comparison of the localization of Smc6 in different experiments and that of Smc6 and Scc1 on whole genome maps, peaks with signal to log ratio higher than 0.6 were chosen, and peaks which were distributed within a 5kb region was recognized as one peak. In the analysis of the number of Smc6 localization sites on each chromosome a 40 kb region spanning all centromeres were excluded. This region in addition to that downstream the rDNA repeats was also excluded from the analysis when comparing Smc6 localization in wild type, scc2-4 and scc1-73 cells. ⢠Array Design: General array design: in situ synthesized arrays by Affymetrix Chromosome VI S.cerevisiae: rikDACF, P/N# 510636 Whole Genome Array S.cerevisiae: S.cerevisiae Tiling1.0F Arrays, Part#520286 and Part#520280
2010-06-11 | E-GEOD-4808 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Nucleosome organization determines local chromatin structure and changes in nucleosome occupancy during the cell cycle are correlated with nuclear functions. We used oligonucleotide tiling arrays to analyze the cell cycle dependence of nucleosome occupancy at cohesin binding sites in yeast chromosomes. Processed data included in Series table. Data processing: To improve the signal to noise ratio, the raw data were first processed with dCHIP with its PM/MM difference model and invariant set normalization method, using the entire dataset. 8251 out of the total 92812 probe pairs were excluded from further analysis because they either have multiple hits in the genome or the signal from the genomic hybridization was too weak (cutoff at (PM-MM)/MM < 0.25). After Gaussian smoothing (s =75 bp), the data were normalized by that of the genomic DNA. These values were then converted to log2 scale. The mean was then computed for each array. To facilitate comparisons, the different datasets were rescaled to have the same mean with log2 value of 0. The log2 ratio along the four chromosomes at all the cell cycle stages are included. The ID represents "Chromosome No_chromosomal coordinate". Keywords: time course Yeast cells were arrested at G1/S boundary with alpha factor, then released for 15 min, 40 min, 65 min and 95 min respectively. Cells were collected at each time points, then mononucleosomal DNA was purified and hybridized to Affymetrix oligonucleotide tiling arrays. Total genomic DNA was hybridized as normalization signal.
2010-05-26 | E-GEOD-8130 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Non mitotic tumor cells are resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. Here, we found a population that is viable but remains in the G1 phase for an extended period of time (up to 48 h) by Long-term time-lapse observations in Fucci-HCT116 cells and then we conducted DNA microarray-based comparative analyses between the RR (the long-term G1-arrested cells) and R (the G1-arrested cells) fractions, to determine the molecular basis of the G1 arrest/maintenance mechanism. This study is related to GSE34940. The labeled cRNAs were hybridized on 4X44K v2 Agilent Whole Human Genome dual color Microarrays (G4845A) in two dye swap experiments, resulting in four individual microarrays.
2015-01-27 | E-GEOD-61088 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Heterogeneity in pluripotent cells marks a metastable state where cells may drift between native and lineage-primed populations. While the role for these heterogeneities are unclear, they may reflect the dynamic equilibriums of signaling networks and have a direct effect on differentiation potentialities. Here, we report the role of the cell cycle in establishing heterogeneity of human pluripotent stem cells. By utilizing the FUCCI cell cycle indicator system coupled to fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS), we have uncovered that the cell cycle drives heterogeneity at the epigenetic, transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Our data show widespread dynamics in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) during the cell cycle. Furthermore, transcript profiling by RNA-sequencing identified >500 genes that were cell cycle-regulated, of which the largest cohort of genes were transcriptional regulators. In sum, we demonstrate the role of the cell cycle in coordinating cellular transitions between metastable states in pluripotent stem cells. mRNA sequencing of the cell cycle phases; early & late G1, S and G2/S from human ES cells in triplicate.
2013-12-19 | E-GEOD-53481 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:au13-11_gravity - gravity - Cell cycle and cell proliferation are decoupled under altered gravity conditions. We have previously shown that semisolid cell cultures of Arabidopsis suffer overall genome changes in response to altered gravity and also that cell cycle stages duration is altered. By using synchronized cell cultures we will demonstrate the precise alterations in cell cycle duration and also the transcriptional signature in any of them. - Experiments consists on exposures of Arabidopsis cell cultures to 1g control/simulated microgravity (RPM) conditions. Asynchronous cells exposed for 14 h + Syncronous populations choosen to have an enrichment of cell cycle phases were used (being T7/T10 samples on G2 phase, T14/T16 samples on G1 phase). 6 dye-swap - time course,treated vs untreated comparison
2014-08-23 | E-GEOD-60473 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Here we analysed the role of yeast Senataxin (Sen1) in coordinating replication with transcription and in protecting genome integrity. Senataxin is mutated in the two severe neurodegenerative diseases AOA2 and ALS4. We show that a fraction of Sen1/Senataxin DNA/RNA helicase associates with replication forks and protects the integrity of those fork encountering highly expressed RNAPII genes. sen1 mutants accumulate aberrant DNA structures and RNA-DNA hybrids while forks clash head-on with RNAPII transcription units and counteract recombinogenic events and accumulation of checkpoint signals. Nrd1, which acts togheter with Sen1 in trascription temination, is not recruited at replication forks. nrd1 mutants does not display replication defects, high genome instability and checkpoint activation observed in sen1 mutants The Sen1 function in replication can be therefore separable from its role in RNA processing. We propose a role for Sen1/Senataxin during chromosome replication in facilitating replisome progression across RNAPII transcribed genes thus preventing DNA-RNA hybrids accumulation when forks encounter nascent transcripts on the lagging strand template. Chip on chip analysis was carried out as described (Bermejo et al., 2011), employing anti-Flag monoclonal antibody M2 (Sigma-Aldrich) Labelled probes were hybridized to Affymetrix S.cerevisiae Tiling 1.0 (P/N 900645) arrays and processed with TAS software.
2012-11-09 | E-GEOD-39139 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:While it has been clearly established that well positioned H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes flank the nucleosome depleted region (NDR) at the transcriptional start site (TSS) of active mammalian genes 1,2, how this chromatin-based information is transmitted through the cell cycle is unknown. We show here that in trophoblast stem (TS) cells, the level of H2A.Z at promoters decreases during S phase coinciding with homotypic (H2A.Z/H2A.Z) nucleosomes flanking the TSS becoming heterotypic (H2A.Z/H2A). Surprisingly, these nucleosomes remain heterotypic at M phase. At the TSS, we identify an unstable heterotypic H2A.Z-containing nucleosome in G1 which, strikingly, is lost following DNA replication. These dynamic changes in H2A.Z at the TSS mirror a global expansion of the NDR at S and M which, unexpectedly, is unrelated to transcriptional activity. Coincident with the loss of H2A.Z at promoters, it is targeted to the centromere when mitosis begins. We surveyed whole genome expression using microarrays, in combination with H2A.Z ChIP-Seq (Illumina) data, to study the H2A.Z distribution on promoters of coding genes in different stages of the cell cycle in Trophoblast Stem (TS) cells. These data are published in Nekrasov et al., H2AZ inheritance during the cell cycle and it's impact on promoter organization and dynamics, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology (in press: accepted for publication on 24 Sep 2012). Mouse Trophoblast stem (TS) cells were grown in cell culture medium. By adding specific drugs cells were arrested at particular stages of the cell cycle: G1; S and M. Total RNA was extracted from TS cells arrested at G1; S and M stages of cell cycle using TRizol (Invitrogen) extraction protocol and purified further the by RNAeasy Extraction Kit (Qiagen). RNA quality was assesed on Bioanalyzer total RNA chip. RNA samples were reverse transcribed and resulted cDNA samples were subjected to DNA microarray analysis (in triplicate) using the GeneChip Mouse Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix). Robust Multichip Average (RMA) correction and probe set summaries were obtained using Affymetrix Power Tools software annotation (Affymetrix) based on the mm9 mouse genome. Unless otherwise stated, all subsequent expression analyses (see Supplementary Methods) were performed in the R statistical computing environment (version 2.11.1).
2012-11-23 | E-GEOD-41370 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Given the intimate link between inflammation and dysregulated cell proliferation in cancer we investigated cytokine-triggered gene expression in different cell cycle stages. High density microarray analysis revealed that G1 release primes and cooperates with the cytokine-driven gene response. This effect is transmitted through CDK6 which shares the ability to regulate expression of inflammatory genes with its functional homologue CDK4. CDK6 contributes to the regulation of inflammatory gene expression by physical and functional cooperation with the NF-κB subunit p65 in the nucleus. ChIPSeq experiments showed a tight co-recruitment of CDK6 and p65 to enhancers and promoters of many transcriptionally active NF-κB target genes. While CDK6 recruitment to distinct chromatin regions of inflammatory target genes had no effect on histone modifications, it was essential for proper loading of NF-κB p65 to its cognate binding sites and for the function of p65 coactivators such as TRIP6. Furthermore, cytokine-inducible nuclear translocation and chromatin association of CDK6 depends on the kinase activity of TAK1 and p38. These results have widespread biological implications, as aberrant CDK6 expression or activation that is frequently observed in human tumors cooperates with NF-κB to shape the cytokine- and chemokine-repertoire in chronic inflammation and cancer. Four sets of experiments were performed in total (Exp1-4). Within each of these sets biological duplicates (Rep1-2) were included and analyzed. HeLa control cells or cells with established shRNA-mediated knockdown of CDK4 or CDK6 were analyzed. Cells were subjected to cell cycle arrest or were released from the arrested state for 6h. Cells were treated for 30 minutes with Interleukin-1-alpha at the arrested state or after release or were left untreated.
2013-12-31 | E-GEOD-52465 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To investigate how histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) change during the cell cycle, we profiled histone H3 and histone H4 in breast cancer and normal breast cell lines arrested in G1/S or G2/M phases.
2019-09-09 | PXD013288 | Pride
Project description:DNA replication of eukaryotic chromosomes initiates at a number of discrete loci, called replication origins. Distribution and regulation of origins are important for complete duplication of the genome. Here, we determined locations of Orc1 and Mcm6, components of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC), on whole genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a high-resolution tiling array. Pre-RC sites were identified in 460 intergenic regions, where Orc1 and Mcm6 colocalized. By mapping of 5-bromo-2â-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated DNA in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), 307 pre-RC sites were identified as early-firing origins. In contrast, 153 pre-RC sites without BrdU incorporation were considered to be late and/or inefficient origins. Early and late origins tend to distribute separately in large chromosome regions. Inactivation of replication checkpoint by deletion of Cds1 resulted in BrdU incorporation with HU specifically at the late origins. An origin-exchange experiment showed that replication timing was not intrinsic to origin but dependent on its surrounding region. Interestingly, pericentromeric heterochromatin and the silent mating type locus replicated in the presence of HU, while the inner centromere or subtelomeric heterochromatin did not. Notably, MCM did not bind to inner centromeres where ORC was located. Thus, replication is differentially regulated in chromosome domains. Keywords: ChIP-chip analysis Experiment Design: ⢠The goal of the experiment â Genome-wide localization of ORC and MCM binding sites and identification of replication origins in Shizosaccaromyces pombe ⢠A brief description of the experiment (e.g., the abstract from the related publication) DNA replication of eukaryotic chromosomes initiates at a number of discrete loci, called replication origins. Distribution and regulation of origins are important for complete duplication of the genome. Here, we determined locations of Orc1 and Mcm6, components of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC), on whole genome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a high-resolution tiling array. Pre-RC sites were identified in 460 intergenic regions, where Orc1 and Mcm6 colocalized. By mapping of 5-bromo-2â-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporated DNA in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), 307 pre-RC sites were identified as early-firing origins. In contrast, 153 pre-RC sites without BrdU incorporation were considered to be late and/or inefficient origins. Early and late origins tend to distribute separately in large chromosome regions. Inactivation of replication checkpoint by deletion of Cds1 resulted in BrdU incorporation with HU specifically at the late origins. An origin-exchange experiment showed that replication timing was not intrinsic to origin but dependent on its surrounding region. Interestingly, pericentromeric heterochromatin and the silent mating type locus replicated in the presence of HU, while the inner centromere or subtelomeric heterochromatin did not. Notably, MCM did not bind to inner centromeres where ORC was located. Thus, replication is differentially regulated in chromosome domains. ⢠Keywords, for example, time course, cell type comparison, array CGH (the use of MGED ontology terms is recommended). Mitosis, Cell cycle, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Whole-genome, Tiling array, Chromosome II, III array, Orc1, Orc4, Mcm6, BrdU-labeling, cds1Î. ⢠Experimental factors Distribution of the Orc1 and Mcm6 in WT in G1 phase (S. pombe). Distribution of the Orc4 in WT in asynchronous cells (S. pombe). Distribution of BrdU-incorporated DNA in WT and in cds1 deletion mutant in S phase in the presence of HU (S. pombe). ⢠Experimental design ChIP analysis: In all cases, hybridization data for ChIP fraction was compared with WCE (whole cell extract) fraction. Pombe whole-genome tiling array were used. BrdU analysis: Hybridization data for BrdU fraction (replicated DNA) was compared with Whole fraction (unreplicated DNA) or hybridization data for BrdU fraction of cds1Î cells was compared with that of WT cells. Pombe whole-genome tiling array were used. ⢠Quality control steps taken Different subunits of the same complex. Confirmation of several loci by q-PCR. Checking the BrdU-labeled DNA fraction in CsCl gradient by q-PCR or slot-blot analysis. ⢠Links to the publication, any supplemental websites or database accession numbers. GSE6523 Samples used, extract preparation and labelling: ⢠The origin of each biological sample ChIP analysis: Schizosaccharomyces pombe nda3-KM311 cdc10-129 strain harboring pREP81-cdc18 and pREP42-cdt1. BrdU analysis: Schizosaccharomyces pombe wild type (cdc25-22 nmt1-TK) and cds1Î strains. ⢠Manipulation of biological samples and protocols used ChIP analysis: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) in G1 arrested cells or asynchronous cells were performed as previously described (Takahashi et al., 2003, EMBO). Hybridization to Affimetrix high-density oligonucleotide array of S. pombe chromosomes 2 and 3 and whole genome tiling array of S. pombe was performed essentially as previously described (Katou et al., 2003, nature) (Lengronne et al., 2004, nature). BrdU analysis: Growing cdc25-22 cells expressing Thymidine Kinase were arrested at G2/M boundary and released in the presence of BrdU and HU. BrdU was incorporated in nascent DNA in following S phase. The genomic DNA was digested by HaeIII and BrdU-labeled DNA was purified in CsCl density gradient centrifugation. Hybridization to Affimetrix high-density oligonucleotide array of S. pombe whole genome tiling array was performed essentially as previously described (Katou et al., 2003, nature) (Lengronne et al., 2004, nature).
2010-06-11 | E-GEOD-6523 | biostudies-arrayexpress