Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Seasonal Changes in Patterns of Gene Expression in Avian Song Control Brain Regions


ABSTRACT: Photoperiod and hormonal cues drive dramatic seasonal changes in structure and function of the avian song control system. Little is known, however, about the patterns of gene expression associated with seasonal changes. Here we address this issue by exposing GambelM-bM-^@M-^Ys white-crowned sparrows to season-appropriate cues and extracting RNA from the telencephalic song control nuclei HVC and RA across multiple time points that capture different stages of growth and regression. We chose HVC and RA because while both nuclei change in volume across seasons, the cellular mechanisms underlying these changes differ. We thus hypothesized that different genes would be expressed between HVC and RA. We tested this by using the extracted RNA to perform a cDNA microarray hybridization developed by the SoNG initiative. We then validated these results using qRT-PCR. Supporting our hypothesis, only 59 of the 363 genes of interest were found to vary by more than |1.5| fold in expression in both nuclei, while 132 gene expression changes were HVC specific and 172 genes were RA specific. We then assigned many of these genes to functional categories relevant to the different mechanisms underlying seasonal change in HVC and RA, including neurogenesis, apoptosis, cell growth, dendrite arborization and axonal growth, angiogenesis, endocrinology, growth factors, and electrophysiology. This revealed categorical differences in the kinds of genes regulated in HVC and RA. These results show that different molecular programs underlie seasonal changes in HVC and RA, and that gene expression is time specific across different reproductive conditions. Our results provide insights into the complex molecular pathways that underlie adult neural plasticity. Experimental groups: long-term Short Day (SD); Long Day (LD) with Testosterone (T) for 3, 7, and 21 days (3LD+T, 7LD+T, 21LD+T respectively); SD and removal of T at 1 and 2 days (1SD-T, 2SD-T); two tissues (HVC, RA) collected separately from each individual animal; one experimental sample and one universal SoNG reference sample per array; dye balanced within groups. Six biological replicates per group, five biological replicates in 3LD+T.HVC group.

ORGANISM(S): Taeniopygia guttata

SUBMITTER: Kirstin Replogle 

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-28347 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

Similar Datasets

2012-05-30 | E-GEOD-36705 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-10-01 | GSE28347 | GEO
2010-05-18 | E-GEOD-18970 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-03-15 | E-GEOD-36269 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-03-24 | E-GEOD-36657 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2014-03-21 | E-GEOD-56075 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-05-30 | E-GEOD-36740 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-05-30 | E-GEOD-36746 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2012-05-30 | E-GEOD-36742 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-08-22 | E-GEOD-50070 | biostudies-arrayexpress