Metabolomics,Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Epidermal gene expression in wound healing and after ex vivo injury


ABSTRACT: Human in vivo skin wound: Non-wounded skin was obtained by taking punch biopsies from three healthy donors (donor 1,2 and 3). The samples were termed 'skin day 0 in vivo wound'. Skin wound samples were retrieved by making new punch biopsies from the edge of the original biopsies after four days. These samples were termed 'skin day 4 in vivo wound'. As much dermal tissue as possible was removed by dissection to make sure mainly epidermis was present in the samples. The samples were washed in NaCl to possible remove infiltrating inflammatory cells before RNA isolation. Ex vivo skin wounds: Skin was obtained from three healthy donors following reduction surgery (donor 1, 2, and 3). As much dermal tissue as possible was removed dissection. These samples were termed 'skin day 0 ex vivo wound'. Skin was sliced into 1x10 mm slices and incubated in keratinocyte medium for four days with either 1:1000 fold dilution of DMSO or 10 micromolar AG-1478 (dissolved in DMSO). Again as much dermal tissue was removed by dissection as possible before RNA was isolated. These samples were termed 'skin day 4 ex vivo wound' and 'skin day 4 AG-1478 ex vivo wound'. By comparing the gene expression day 4 in ex vivo wound with in vivo wounds it was possible to see which part of the gene expression in wounded skin that was due to the epidermal reaction to injury and how much was due to stimuli from infiltrating inflammatory cells absent in the ex vivo skin wounds. By comparing the data from ex vivo skin wounds day 4 with and without the EGFR-inhibitor AG-1478, it was possible to look at the importance of the EGF-receptor of EGFR for the gene expression in ex vivo wounded skin.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Ole Sorensen 

PROVIDER: E-MEXP-3305 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

altmetric image

Publications

Constitutive and inflammation-dependent antimicrobial peptides produced by epithelium are differentially processed and inactivated by the commensal Finegoldia magna and the pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes.

Frick Inga-Maria IM   Nordin Sara L SL   Baumgarten Maria M   Mörgelin Matthias M   Sørensen Ole E OE   Olin Anders I AI   Egesten Arne A  

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 20110914 8


Epithelial linings serve as physical barriers and produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to maintain host integrity. Examples are the bactericidal proteins midkine (MK) and BRAK/CXCL14 that are constitutively produced in the skin epidermal layer, where the anaerobic Gram-positive coccoid commensal Finegoldia magna resides. Consequently, this bacterium is likely to encounter both MK and BRAK/CXCL14, making these molecules possible threats to its habitat. In this study, we show that MK expression i  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2022-12-19 | PXD034076 | Pride
2010-05-22 | E-GEOD-7435 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2011-10-24 | E-GEOD-33169 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-02-26 | E-GEOD-44671 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2018-07-31 | E-MTAB-6686 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2018-07-30 | PXD007234 | Pride
2009-09-07 | E-GEOD-17539 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-09-01 | E-GEOD-46244 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2013-11-01 | E-GEOD-50578 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2010-07-20 | E-GEOD-23006 | biostudies-arrayexpress