Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A New Strategy for Evaluating the Quality of Laboratory Results for Big Data Research: Using External Quality Assessment Survey Data (2010-2020).


ABSTRACT:

Background

To ensure valid results of big data research in the medical field, the input laboratory results need to be of high quality. We aimed to establish a strategy for evaluating the quality of laboratory results suitable for big data research.

Methods

We used Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS) data to retrospectively review multicenter data. Seven measurands were analyzed using commutable materials: HbA1c, creatinine (Cr), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI). These were classified into three groups based on their standardization or harmonization status. HbA1c, Cr, TC, TG, and AFP were analyzed with respect to peer group values. PSA and cTnI were analyzed in separate peer groups according to the calibrator type and manufacturer, respectively. The acceptance rate and absolute percentage bias at the medical decision level were calculated based on biological variation criteria.

Results

The acceptance rate (22.5%-100%) varied greatly among the test items, and the mean percentage biases were 0.6%-5.6%, 1.0%-9.6%, and 1.6%-11.3% for all items that satisfied optimum, desirable, and minimum criteria, respectively.

Conclusions

The acceptance rate of participants and their external quality assessment (EQA) results exhibited statistically significant differences according to the quality grade for each criterion. Even when they passed the EQA standards, the test results did not guarantee the quality requirements for big data. We suggest that the KEQAS classification can serve as a guide for building big data.

SUBMITTER: Cho EJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10151270 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A New Strategy for Evaluating the Quality of Laboratory Results for Big Data Research: Using External Quality Assessment Survey Data (2010-2020).

Cho Eun-Jung EJ   Jeong Tae-Dong TD   Kim Sollip S   Park Hyung-Doo HD   Yun Yeo-Min YM   Chun Sail S   Min Won-Ki WK  

Annals of laboratory medicine 20230421 5


<h4>Background</h4>To ensure valid results of big data research in the medical field, the input laboratory results need to be of high quality. We aimed to establish a strategy for evaluating the quality of laboratory results suitable for big data research.<h4>Methods</h4>We used Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS) data to retrospectively review multicenter data. Seven measurands were analyzed using commutable materials: HbA1c, creatinine (Cr), total cholesterol (TC)  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9241268 | biostudies-literature
| S-BSST893 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9055699 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6740165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11881469 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10025026 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3499747 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10084691 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5989378 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8890492 | biostudies-literature