Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The prognostic significance of non-disabling relapses in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is unclear.Objective
To determine whether early non-disabling relapses predict disability accumulation in RRMS.Methods
We redefined mild relapses in MSBase as 'non-disabling', and moderate or severe relapses as 'disabling'. We used mixed-effects Cox models to compare 90-day confirmed disability accumulation events in people with exclusively non-disabling relapses within 2 years of RRMS diagnosis to those with no early relapses; and any early disabling relapses. Analyses were stratified by disease-modifying therapy (DMT) efficacy during follow-up.Results
People who experienced non-disabling relapses within 2 years of RRMS diagnosis accumulated more disability than those with no early relapses if they were untreated (n = 285 vs 4717; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.68) or given platform DMTs (n = 1074 vs 7262; HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15-1.54), but not if given high-efficacy DMTs (n = 572 vs 3534; HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.71-1.13) during follow-up. Differences in disability accumulation between those with early non-disabling relapses and those with early disabling relapses were not confirmed statistically.Conclusion
This study suggests that early non-disabling relapses are associated with a higher risk of disability accumulation than no early relapses in RRMS. This risk may be mitigated by high-efficacy DMTs. Therefore, non-disabling relapses should be considered when making treatment decisions.
SUBMITTER: Daruwalla C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10278381 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Daruwalla Cyrus C Shaygannejad Vahid V Ozakbas Serkan S Havrdova Eva Kubala EK Horakova Dana D Alroughani Raed R Boz Cavit C Patti Francesco F Onofrj Marco M Lugaresi Alessandra A Eichau Sara S Girard Marc M Prat Alexandre A Duquette Pierre P Yamout Bassem B Khoury Samia J SJ Sajedi Seyed Aidin SA Turkoglu Recai R Altintas Ayse A Skibina Olga O Buzzard Katherine K Grammond Pierre P Karabudak Rana R van der Walt Anneke A Butzkueven Helmut H Maimone Davide D Lechner-Scott Jeannette J Soysal Aysun A John Nevin N Prevost Julie J Spitaleri Daniele D Ramo-Tello Cristina C Gerlach Oliver O Iuliano Gerardo G Foschi Matteo M Ampapa Radek R van Pesch Vincent V Barnett Michael M Shalaby Nevin N D'hooghe Marie M Kuhle Jens J Sa Maria Jose MJ Fabis-Pedrini Marzena M Kermode Allan A Mrabet Saloua S Gouider Riadh R Hodgkinson Suzanne S Laureys Guy G Van Hijfte Liesbeth L Macdonell Richard R Oreja-Guevara Celia C Cristiano Edgardo E McCombe Pamela P Sanchez-Menoyo Jose Luis JL Singhal Bhim B Blanco Yolanda Y Hughes Stella S Garber Justin J Solaro Claudio C McGuigan Chris C Taylor Bruce B de Gans Koen K Habek Mario M Al-Asmi Abdullah A Mihaela Simu S Castillo Triviño Tamara T Al-Harbi Talal T Rojas Juan Ignacio JI Gray Orla O Khurana Dheeraj D Van Wijmeersch Bart B Grigoriadis Nikolaos N Inshasi Jihad J Oh Jiwon J Aguera-Morales Eduardo E Fragoso Yara Y Moore Fraser F Shaw Cameron C Baghbanian Seyed Mohammad SM Shuey Neil N Willekens Barbara B Hardy Todd A TA Decoo Danny D Sempere Angel Perez AP Field Deborah D Wynford-Thomas Ray R Cunniffe Nick G NG Roos Izanne I Malpas Charles B CB Coles Alasdair J AJ Kalincik Tomas T Brown J William L JWL
Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 20230227 7
<h4>Background</h4>The prognostic significance of non-disabling relapses in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether early non-disabling relapses predict disability accumulation in RRMS.<h4>Methods</h4>We redefined mild relapses in MSBase as 'non-disabling', and moderate or severe relapses as 'disabling'. We used mixed-effects Cox models to compare 90-day confirmed disability accumulation events in people with exclusively non-dis ...[more]