Dataset Information

A modified melanoma-molGPA scoring model: assessment of survival after and efficacy of different radiotherapy modalities in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Patients with malignant melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) have poor prognoses. For MBMs, the Melanoma-molGPA is the most widely used predictive score, but its predictive value remains uncertain in patients fully treated with radiotherapy. We identified MBMs prognostic factors and modified the prognostic scoring model.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with MBMs between December 2010 and November 2021 for prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses. Nomogram plots were based on Cox regression modeling. We evaluated overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests.

Results

The median OS (mOS) was 7.9 months. On multivariate analysis, BRAF mutation status (p < 0.001), number of brain metastases (BM) (p < 0.001), presence of liver metastases (p < 0.001), brain metastases with a midline shift (p = 0.003), Karnofsky Performance Score (p = 0.02), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (p < 0.0001) were independent OS predictors. These were incorporated into a modified risk-stratification model. Overall, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) did not significantly affect mOS (mOS, 6.89 vs. 8.83 months; p = 0.07). After risk stratification using our model, WBRT resulted in no significant survival benefit in the low-risk group (mOS 10.07 vs. 13.1 months; p = 0.71) but significantly worse prognosis in the high-risk group (mOS, 2.37 vs. 6.92 months; p = 0.026).

Conclusion

We propose a modified model that accurately distinguishes the prognosis of patients with MBMs and guides decision-making for radiotherapy. Based on this novel model, WBRT should be cautiously selected for high-risk patients.

SUBMITTER: Wu Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10310639 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A modified melanoma-molGPA scoring model: assessment of survival after and efficacy of different radiotherapy modalities in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Wu Qian Q Zhang Xueqing X Li Hui H Tang Lirui L Zeng Yibin Y Lin Jing J Chen Yu Y Li Jinluan J

Discover oncology 20230629 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Patients with malignant melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) have poor prognoses. For MBMs, the Melanoma-molGPA is the most widely used predictive score, but its predictive value remains uncertain in patients fully treated with radiotherapy. We identified MBMs prognostic factors and modified the prognostic scoring model.<h4>Methods</h4>We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with MBMs between December 2010 and November 2021 for prognostic factors influencing overall survival ( ...[more]

PMID: 37382755

Similar Datasets

Project description:Few data are available on patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) from melanoma treated with new systemic therapies. To gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutic interventions in melanoma patients with LM in the era of new systemic treatment. Clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival of melanoma patients diagnosed with LM, isolated or associated with brain metastases, were collected. The Cox regression model assessed the influence of patient and melanoma characteristics on survival. Monocentric, retrospective, real-life cohort of patients with LM from melanoma. All patients followed up at Saint-Louis University Hospital and diagnosed with LM between December 2013 and February 2020 were included. For each patient identified, a central review by dermato-oncologist and neuro-oncologist experts was performed to confirm the diagnosis of LM. Impact of new systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Among the 452 advanced melanoma patients followed at St Louis Hospital between 2013 and 2020, 41 patients with LM from melanoma were identified. Among them, 29 patients with a diagnosis of LM "confirmed" or "probable" after central neuro-oncologists reviewing were included. Nineteen patients had known melanoma brain metastases at LM diagnosis. Among the 27 patients treated with systemic therapy, 17 patients were treated with immunotherapy, 5 patients received targeted therapy, 1 was treated with chemotherapy, and 4 patients were treated with anti-PD-1 in combination with BRAF inhibitor. The median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 5.1 months. Median OS was 7.1 months for the 9 patients receiving systemic therapy combined with radiotherapy, and 3.2 months for the 20 patients not receiving combined radiotherapy. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09-1.90, p < 0.01) and presence of neurological symptoms at LM diagnosis (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.25-6.99, p = 0.01) were associated with poor survival. At the time of data analysis, five patients were still alive with a median follow-up of 47.4 months and had persistent complete response. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising new treatment options in LM from melanoma that can increase overall survival, and may induce long lasting remission in some patients.

Project description:BackgroundUveal melanoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. About half of the patients develop distant metastases, most commonly liver metastases (>90%). These are associated with poorer overall survival compared to patients with extrahepatic metastases.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between January 2005 and December 2021 and treated at the Center for Dermato-oncology at the University of Tübingen, were included. The total cohort was divided into two groups. Group 1, in which the first diagnosis of metastasis was between 2005 and 2015 and group 2 with first metastasis between 2016 and 2021. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, test for differences was performed by the log-rank test.ResultsA total of 167 patients were included in the study. Since more than 90% of patients had developed liver metastases as their first site of metastasis, we focused our analysis on patients with liver metastases. Median MSS was 28 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (22.8-33.2 months)) in patients receiving first-line liver-directed therapy (n = 89) compared to 10 months (95% CI (8.4-11.6 months)) for patients with first-line systemic therapy (n = 45). The best MSS was found in patients of group 2 and liver-directed therapy as first-line treatment. Since survival with first-line liver-directed therapy was significantly better in group 2, subsequent systemic therapies must also be considered, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors.ConclusionThis analysis revealed that MSS has improved significantly in recent years. In our analysis, first-line liver-directed therapy was associated with improved survival compared to first-line systemic therapy. Further studies are urgently needed, for example, to investigate the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition or tebentafusp with liver-specific procedures from the outset.

Dataset Information

A modified melanoma-molGPA scoring model: assessment of survival after and efficacy of different radiotherapy modalities in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

A modified melanoma-molGPA scoring model: assessment of survival after and efficacy of different radiotherapy modalities in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets