Dataset Information

Catheter ablation of malignant atrial fibrillation as palliative therapy for end-stage heart failure: A case report.

ABSTRACT: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to medical therapy in reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but patients with end-stage HF were often excluded. A 64-year-old man diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy was hospitalized due to worsening HF and incident AF. An echocardiographic examination revealed the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 90 mm and left ventricular ejection fraction of 12 %. Cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm, but intermittent transitions to AF caused the patient hemodynamic instability and mental distress. We carefully performed AF ablation, and sinus rhythm was maintained thereafter. After cardiac rehabilitation, he was successfully discharged home. However, he was re-hospitalized due to worsening HF 6 months post-AF ablation, and he eventually passed away. While AF ablation cannot prevent the progression of inherent cardiomyopathy, it can improve the quality of life even for patients with end-stage HF. However, the effect was temporary and considered a palliative treatment. This case highlights the potential benefits and limitations of AF ablation in end-stage HF patients and the need for further research to establish the optimal treatment for this population.

Learning objective

Atrial fibrillation ablation can restore sinus rhythm and improve the quality of life even in some patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). However, it cannot prevent the progression of inherent cardiomyopathy. In the era of interventional HF therapy, catheter ablation may have a palliative role in reducing patient distress caused by life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with end-stage HF.

SUBMITTER: Okada M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10477049 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Catheter ablation of malignant atrial fibrillation as palliative therapy for end-stage heart failure: A case report.

Okada Masato M Tanaka Nobuaki N Tanaka Koji K Hirao Yuko Y Inoue Koichi K

Journal of cardiology cases 20230601 3

Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to medical therapy in reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but patients with end-stage HF were often excluded. A 64-year-old man diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy was hospitalized due to worsening HF and incident AF. An echocardiographic examination revealed the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 90 mm and left vent ...[more]

PMID: 37671262

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Assessing the cost-effectiveness credentials of this intervention in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) compared with usual medical therapy. DESIGN:A Markov model comprising two health states (ie, alive or dead) was constructed. The transition probabilities were directly derived from published Kaplan-Meier curves of the pivotal randomised controlled trial and extrapolated over the cohort's lifetime using recommended methods. Costs of catheter ablation, outpatient consultations, hospitalisation, medications and examinations were included. Resource use and unit costs were sourced from government websites or published literature. A lifetime horizon and a healthcare system perspective were taken. All costs and benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were run around the key model parameters to test the robustness of the base case results. PARTICIPANTS:A hypothetical Australian cohort of patients with concomitant AF and HF who are resistant to antiarrhythmic treatment. INTERVENTIONS:Catheter ablation versus medical therapy. RESULTS:The catheter ablation was associated with a cost of $A44 377 per person, in comparison to $A28 506 for the medical therapy alone over a lifetime. Catheter ablation contributed to 4.58 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 6.99 LY gains compared with 4.30 QALYs and 6.53 LY gains, respectively, in the medical therapy arm. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $A55 942/QALY or $A35 020/LY. The DSA showed that results were highly sensitive to costs of ablation and time horizon. The PSA yielded very consistent results with the base case. CONCLUSIONS:Offering catheter ablation procedure to patients with systematic paroxysmal or persistent AF who failed to respond to antiarrhythmic drugs was associated with higher costs, greater benefits. When compared with medical therapy alone, this intervention is not cost-effective from an Australia healthcare system perspective.

Project description:(1) Background: A plethora of studies have elucidated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for patients afflicted with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, the literature on the benefits of CA in the specific etiological context of heart failure (HF) remains limited. This study delineates a comparative assessment of outcomes for patients with AF and reduced LVEF across the primary etiologies. (2) Methods: Our inquiry encompassed 216 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure and an LVEF of less than 50 percent who were referred to our institution for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) between the years 2016 and 2020. The selection criteria included a detailed medical history while excluding those suffering from valvular disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In an effort to scrutinize varying etiologies, patients were stratified into three categories: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 56, 30.6%), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, n = 68, 37.2%), and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC, n = 59, 32.2%). (3) Results: Following an average (±SD) duration of 36 ± 3 months, the prevalence of sinus rhythm was 52.1% in the DCM group, 50.0% in the ICM group, and 68.14% in the TIC group (p = 0.014). This study revealed a significant disparity between the DCM and TIC groups (p = 0.021) and the ICM and TIC groups (p = 0.007), yet no significant distinction was discerned between the TIC and ICM groups (p = 0.769). Importantly, there were no significant variations in the application of antiarrhythmic drugs or recurrence of procedures among the three groups. The mortality rates were 14.29% for the DCM group and 14.71% for the ICM group, which were higher than the 3.39% observed in the TIC group (DCM vs. TIC p = 0.035 (HR = 4.50 (95%CI 1.38-14.67)), ICM vs. TIC p = 0.021 (HR = 5.00 (95%CI 1.61-15.50))). A noteworthy enhancement in heart function was evidenced in the TIC group in comparison to the DCM and ICM groups, including a higher LVEF (p < 0.001), diminution of LV end-diastolic diameter (p < 0.001), and an enhanced New York Heart Association classification (p = 0.005). Hospitalization rates for heart failure were discernibly lower in TIC patients (0.98 (0,2) times) relative to those with DCM (1.74 (0,3) times, p < 0.01) and TIC (1.78 (0,4) times, p < 0.001). Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and brief episodes were found to achieve superior clinical outcomes through a catheter ablation strategy. (4) Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with TIC demonstrated a more pronounced benefit from catheter ablation compared to those with DCM and ICM. This encompassed an augmented improvement in cardiac function, an enhanced maintenance of sinus rhythm, and a reduced mortality rate.

Dataset Information

Catheter ablation of malignant atrial fibrillation as palliative therapy for end-stage heart failure: A case report.

Learning objective

Publications

Catheter ablation of malignant atrial fibrillation as palliative therapy for end-stage heart failure: A case report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets