Dataset Information

Progress of ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz in Clinical Trials.

ABSTRACT: ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz is a novel positron emission computed tomography (PET) tracer in ongoing clinical trials in United States and Japan. A phase III prospective, open-label, multi-center study to assess the feasibility of ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz was reported by Maddahi et al. in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) in 2020 in United States (1). ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz binds to mitochondrial complex 1 and would distribute to the myocardium with its higher extraction fraction than those in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers (2). In that phase III trial, 795 participants with known or suspected CAD showed that sensitivity of ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz PET (for detection of ≥50% stenosis by invasive coronary angiography) was 71.9%, significantly (p < 0.001) higher than ^99mTc labeled SPECT agent (53.7%), while specificity did not meet the prespecified noninferiority criterion (76.2% vs. 86.6%, p=NS) (1). Therefore, a second phase III Food and Drug Administration trial was planned and completed by GE Healthcare. Late phase II open-label multicenter study of PET scan using ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz (named NMB58 in Japan) to assess myocardial blood flow and diagnostic feasibility in patients with known or suspected CAD started in Japan of 2023.

SUBMITTER: Matsumoto N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10696143 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Progress of 18F-flurpiridaz in Clinical Trials.

Matsumoto Naoya N

Annals of nuclear cardiology 20231031 1

18F-flurpiridaz is a novel positron emission computed tomography (PET) tracer in ongoing clinical trials in United States and Japan. A phase III prospective, open-label, multi-center study to assess the feasibility of 18F-flurpiridaz was reported by Maddahi et al. in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) in 2020 in United States (1). 18F-flurpiridaz binds to mitochondrial complex 1 and would distribute to the myocardium with its higher ex ...[more]

PMID: 38058576

Similar Datasets

Project description:The performance of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may deteriorate in smaller hearts, primarily because of the lower resolution of conventional Anger cameras. 18F-flurpiridaz is a novel PET MPI agent with superior image and defect resolution. We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of 99mTc-labeled SPECT MPI compared with 18F-flurpiridaz PET MPI according to left ventricle (LV) size. Methods: We conducted a substudy of the phase III clinical trial of flurpiridaz (n = 750) and stratified diagnostic performance according to the median PET LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), with smaller LVs defined as having an LVEDV of less than 113 mL (n = 369) and larger LVs defined as having an LVEDV of at least 113 mL (n = 381). Images were interpreted by the majority rule of 3 independent masked readers. The reference standard was quantitative invasive angiography, with at least 50% stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery considered significant. Results: SPECT performance decreased significantly from an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 in larger LVs to 0.67 in smaller LVs (P = 0.03), whereas PET performance was similar in larger and smaller LVs (AUC, 0.79 vs. 0.77, P = 0.49). Accordingly, in smaller LVs, PET had a higher AUC (0.77) than the SPECT AUC (0.67) (P < 0.0001), a phenomenon driven by female patients (P < 0.0001). In smaller LVs, there was a degradation of SPECT sensitivity that was highly significant (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant change in PET sensitivity according to LV size (P = 0.07). Overall, PET had significantly higher sensitivity than SPECT in both smaller LVs (67% vs. 43%, P < 0.001) and larger LVs (76% vs. 61%, P < 0.001). The specificities of PET and SPECT were similar in larger LVs (76% vs. 83%, P = 0.11). Although SPECT specificity improved in smaller compared with larger LVs (90% vs. 83%, P = 0.03), the PET specificity did not change with LV size (76% vs. 76%, P = 0.9). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of 18F-flurpiridaz PET MPI is not affected by LV size and is superior to SPECT MPI in patients with smaller LVs, highlighting the importance of appropriate test selection in these patients.

Project description:BackgroundStandard measures of response such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors are ineffective for bone lesions, often making breast cancer patients that have bone-dominant metastases ineligible for clinical trials with potentially helpful therapies. In this study we prospectively evaluated the test-retest uptake variability of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) in a cohort of breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases to determine response criteria. The thresholds for 95% specificity of change versus no-change were then applied to a second cohort of breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases.MethodsFor this study, nine patients with 38 bone lesions were imaged with 18F-FDG in the same calibrated scanner twice within 14 days. Tumor uptake was quantified by the most commonly used PET parameter, the maximum tumor voxel normalized by dose and body weight (SUVmax) and also by the mean of a 1-cc maximal uptake volume normalized by dose and lean-body-mass (SULpeak). The asymmetric repeatability coefficients with confidence intervals for SUVmax and SULpeak were used to determine the limits of 18F-FDG uptake variability. A second cohort of 28 breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases that had 146 metastatic bone lesions was imaged with 18F-FDG before and after standard-of-care therapy for response assessment.ResultsThe mean relative difference of SUVmax and SULpeak in 38 bone tumors of the first cohort were 4.3% and 6.7%. The upper and lower asymmetric limits of the repeatability coefficient were 19.4% and - 16.3% for SUVmax, and 21.2% and - 17.5% for SULpeak. 18F-FDG repeatability coefficient confidence intervals resulted in the following patient stratification using SULpeak for the second patient cohort: 11-progressive disease, 5-stable disease, 7-partial response, and 1-complete response with three inevaluable patients. The asymmetric repeatability coefficients response criteria for SULpeak changed the status of 3 patients compared to the standard Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors of ± 30% SULpeak.ConclusionIn evaluating bone tumor response for breast cancer patients with bone-dominant metastases using 18F-FDG SUVmax, the repeatability coefficients from test-retest studies show that reductions of more than 17% and increases of more than 20% are unlikely to be due to measurement variability. Serial 18F-FDG imaging in clinical trials investigating bone lesions in these patients, such as the ECOG-ACRIN EA1183 trial, benefit from confidence limits that allow interpretation of response.

Project description:IntroductionTau-targeted positron emission tomography (tau-PET) is a potential tool for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to clarify the distribution of tau deposition. In addition to the quantitative analysis of tau-PET scans, visual reading supports the assessment of tau loading for clinical diagnosis. This study aimed to propose a method for visually interpreting tau-PET using the [18F] Florzolotau tracer and investigate the performance and utility of the visual reading.Materials and methodsA total number of 46 individuals with 12 cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU), 20 AD patients with mild cognitive impairment (AD-MCI), and 14 AD with dementia (AD-D) patients with both [18F]Florbetapir amyloid PET and [18F]Florzolotau tau PET scans were included. Clinical information, cognitive assessment, and amyloid PET scan results were recorded. For visual interpretation, a modified rainbow colormap was created and a regional tau uptake scoring system was proposed to evaluate the degree of tracer uptake and its spatial distribution within five cortical regions. Each region was scored on a scale of [0, 2] as compared to the background, and that resulted in a global scale range of [0, 10]. Four readers interpreted [18F]Florzolotau PET using the visual scale. The global and regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) were also calculated for analysis.ResultsThe result indicates the average global visual scores were 0 ± 0 in the CU group, 3.43 ± 3.35 in the AD-MCI group, and 6.31 ± 2.97 in the AD-D group (p < 0.001). The consensus among the four observers on image scores was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.880 (95% CI: 0.767-0.936). The average global visual score was significantly associated with global SUVr (r = 0.884, p < 0.0001) and with the CDR-sum of box (r = 0.677, p < 0.0001).ConclusionThe visual reading method generated a visual score of [18F]Florzolotau tau-PET with good sensitivity and specificity to identify AD-D or CU individuals from the other patients. The preliminary result also showed that the global visual scores are significantly and reliably correlated with global cortical SUVr, and associated well with the clinical diagnosis and cognitive performance.

Dataset Information

Progress of ¹⁸F-flurpiridaz in Clinical Trials.

Publications

Progress of <sup>18</sup>F-flurpiridaz in Clinical Trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets