Dataset Information

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: comparison between susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping techniques.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T1/T2 mapping can be used to detect reperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of the SWI and T1/T2 mapping sequences were not systematically compared. The study aimed to evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of SWI in patients with IMH, compared with T1/T2 mapping.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on consecutive acute STEMI patients who were recruited from January to July 2022. Within 2-6 days after reperfusion treatment, all patients underwent a 3T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination, including T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (T2W-STIR), T1/T2 mapping, and SWI. A total of 36 patients [age, 56.50±17.25 years; males, 83.33% (30/36)] were enrolled. The relative infarct-remote myocardium signal intensity ratio (SIinfarct-remote) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for each patient on T1/T2 mapping and SWI, and the difference between relative signal intensity-to-noise ratio (rSNR) in the IMH (rSNRIMH) was measured for IMH patients on T1/T2 mapping and SWI. SIinfarct-remote, CNR, and rSNRIMH were compared among the three sequences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three sequences by SIinfarct-remote and visual assessment.

Results

A total of 26 (72.22%) patients had IMH. Quantitatively, the SIinfarct-remote of three sequences had excellent diagnostic performance for detecting IMH [SWI area under the curve (AUC) =1.000, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.000-1.000 vs. T1 mapping AUC =0.954, 95% CI: 0.885-1.000 vs. T2 mapping AUC =0.985, 95% CI: 0.955-1.000; SWI vs. T1 mapping, P=0.300; SWI vs. T2 mapping, P=0.188; T1 mapping vs. T2 mapping, P=0.302). Qualitatively, three sequences had similar performance on detecting IMH (SWI AUC =0.895, 95% CI: 0.784-1.000; T1 mapping AUC =0.835, 95% CI: 0.711-0.958; and T2 mapping AUC =0.855, 95% CI: 0.735-0.974; SWI vs. T1 mapping, P=0.172; SWI vs. T2 mapping, P=0.317; T1 mapping vs. T2 mapping, P=0.710). The rSNRIMH was highest in T1 mapping, followed by T2 mapping and SWI, but SWI had the highest CNR.

Conclusions

SWI, as well as T1/T2 mapping, is a feasible and accurate approach for clinical diagnosis of IMH with excellent performance.

SUBMITTER: Wen J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10784041 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: comparison between susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping techniques.

Wen Jinyang J Qiao Jinhan J Tang Yuanyuan Y Zhao Yun Y Yang Zhaoxia Z Wang Luyun L Tao Xinwei X Zhou Xiaoyue X Xia Liming L Tang Dazhong D Huang Lu L

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 20231128 1

<h4>Background</h4>Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T1/T2 mapping can be used to detect reperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of the SWI and T1/T2 mapping sequences were not systematically compared. The study aimed to evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of SWI in patients with IMH, compared with T1/T2 mapping.<h4>Methods</h4>A prospective study was conducted on cons ...[more]

PMID: 38223054

Similar Datasets

Project description:Patients with recent non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction commonly have heterogeneous characteristics that may be challenging to assess clinically. We prospectively studied the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel (T1, T2 mapping) and 1 established (T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery [T2W-STIR]) magnetic resonance imaging methods for imaging the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in 73 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (mean age 57±10 years, 78% male) at 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging within 6.5±3.5 days of invasive management. The infarct-related territory was identified independently using a combination of angiographic, ECG, and clinical findings. The presence and extent of infarction was assessed with late gadolinium enhancement imaging (gadobutrol, 0.1 mmol/kg). The extent of acutely injured myocardium was independently assessed with native T1, T2, and T2W-STIR methods. The mean infarct size was 5.9±8.0% of left ventricular mass. The infarct zone T1 and T2 times were 1323±68 and 57±5 ms, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies of T1 and T2 mapping for identification of the infarct-related artery were similar (P=0.125), and both were superior to T2W-STIR (P<0.001). The extent of myocardial injury (percentage of left ventricular volume) estimated with T1 (15.8±10.6%) and T2 maps (16.0±11.8%) was similar (P=0.838) and moderately well correlated (r=0.82, P<0.001). Mean extent of acute injury estimated with T2W-STIR (7.8±11.6%) was lower than that estimated with T1 (P<0.001) or T2 maps (P<0.001). In patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging mapping have higher diagnostic performance than T2W-STIR for identifying the infarct-related artery. Compared with conventional STIR, T1 and T2 maps have superior value to inform diagnosis and revascularization planning in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02073422.

Project description:BackgroundIntramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poor prognosis. In cardiac magnetic resonance (MR), T2* mapping is the reference standard for detecting IMH while cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) can characterize myocardial architecture via fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of water molecules. The value of cDTI in the detection of IMH is not currently known.HypothesiscDTI can detect IMH post-STEMI.Study typeProspective.SubjectsA total of 50 patients (20% female) scanned at 1-week (V1) and 3-month (V2) post-STEMI.Field strength/sequenceA 3.0 T; inversion-recovery T1-weighted-imaging, multigradient-echo T2* mapping, spin-echo cDTI.AssessmentT2* maps were analyzed to detect IMH (defined as areas with T2* < 20 msec within areas of infarction). cDTI images were co-registered to produce averaged diffusion-weighted-images (DWIs), MD, and FA maps; hypointense areas were manually planimetered for IMH quantification.StatisticsOn averaged DWI, the presence of hypointense signal in areas matching IMH on T2* maps constituted to true-positive detection of iron. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare regional cDTI values. Results were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05.ResultsAt V1, 24 patients had IMH on T2*. On averaged DWI, all 24 patients had hypointense signal in matching areas. IMH size derived using averaged-DWI was nonsignificantly greater than from T2* (2.0 ± 1.0 cm2 vs 1.89 ± 0.96 cm2 , P = 0.69). Compared to surrounding infarcted myocardium, MD was significantly reduced (1.29 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2 /sec vs 1.75 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2 /sec) and FA was significantly increased (0.40 ± 0.07 vs 0.23 ± 0.03) within areas of IMH. By V2, all 24 patients with acute IMH continued to have hypointense signals on averaged-DWI in the affected area. T2* detected IMH in 96% of these patients. Overall, averaged-DWI had 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the detection of IMH.Data conclusionThis study demonstrates that the parameters MD and FA are susceptible to the paramagnetic properties of iron, enabling cDTI to detect IMH.Evidence level1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Dataset Information

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: comparison between susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping techniques.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging detection of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: comparison between susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1/T2 mapping techniques.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets