Unknown

Dataset Information

0

CLIP Test: a new fast, simple and powerful method to distinguish between linked or pleiotropic quantitative trait loci in linkage disequilibria analysis.


ABSTRACT: An important question arises when mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for genetically correlated traits: is the correlation due to pleiotropy (a single QTL affecting more than one trait) and/or close linkage (different QTLs that are physically close to each other and influence the traits)? In this article, we propose the Close Linkage versus Pleiotropism (CLIP) test, a fast, simple and powerful method to distinguish between these two situations. The CLIP test is based on the comparison of the square of the observed correlation between a combination of apparent effects at the marker level to the minimal value it can take under the pleiotropic assumption. A simulation study was performed to estimate the power and alpha risk of the CLIP test and compare it to a test that evaluated whether the confidence intervals of the two QTLs overlapped or not (CI test). On average, the CLIP test showed a higher power (68%) to detect close-linked QTLs than the CI test (43%) and a same alpha risk (4%).

SUBMITTER: David I 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3668649 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

CLIP Test: a new fast, simple and powerful method to distinguish between linked or pleiotropic quantitative trait loci in linkage disequilibria analysis.

David I I   Elsen J-M JM   Concordet D D  

Heredity 20121219 3


An important question arises when mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for genetically correlated traits: is the correlation due to pleiotropy (a single QTL affecting more than one trait) and/or close linkage (different QTLs that are physically close to each other and influence the traits)? In this article, we propose the Close Linkage versus Pleiotropism (CLIP) test, a fast, simple and powerful method to distinguish between these two situations. The CLIP test is based on the comparison of the  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2984198 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2784197 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC379157 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8633382 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC384993 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6381792 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7860582 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4015628 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8476167 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4464510 | biostudies-literature