Dataset Information

Application of Operational Tolerance Signatures Are Limited by Variability and Type of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) frequently develop complications relating to chronic immunosuppression. Identifying RTR who could safely reduce immunosuppression is therefore highly desirable. We hypothesized that "signatures" described in RTR who have stopped immunosuppression but maintained stable graft function ("operational tolerance") may enable identification of immunosuppressed RTR who are candidates for immunosuppression minimization. However, the effect of immunosuppression itself on these signatures and circulating B-cell populations is currently unknown.

Methods

We undertook a cross-sectional study of 117 RTR to assess the effect of immunosuppression upon circulating B cell populations, humoral alloresponse and 2 previously published "signatures" of operational tolerance.

Results

Immunosuppression associated with alterations in both published "signatures." Azathioprine associated with a decrease in transitional and naive B-cell numbers and calcineurin inhibition associated with an increase in the number of circulating plasmablasts. However, only azathioprine use associated with the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA IgG antibodies. Calcineurin inhibition associated with an increase in total serum IgM but not IgG. Data were corrected for age, time since last transplant, and other immunosuppression.

Conclusions

Current signatures of operational tolerance may be significantly affected by immunosuppressive regimen, which may hinder use in their current form in clinical practice. Calcineurin inhibition may prevent the development of long-lasting humoral alloresponses, whereas azathioprine therapy may be associated with donor specific antibody development.

SUBMITTER: Bottomley MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5361564 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Application of Operational Tolerance Signatures Are Limited by Variability and Type of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Bottomley Matthew J MJ Chen Mian M Fuggle Sue S Harden Paul N PN Wood Kathryn J KJ

Transplantation direct 20161221 1

<h4>Background</h4>Renal transplant recipients (RTR) frequently develop complications relating to chronic immunosuppression. Identifying RTR who could safely reduce immunosuppression is therefore highly desirable. We hypothesized that "signatures" described in RTR who have stopped immunosuppression but maintained stable graft function ("operational tolerance") may enable identification of immunosuppressed RTR who are candidates for immunosuppression minimization. However, the effect of immunosup ...[more]

PMID: 28349125

Similar Datasets

Project description:Survival of solid organ grafts depends on life-long immunosuppression, which results in increased rates of infection and malignancy. Induction of tolerance to allografts would represent the optimal solution for controlling both chronic rejection (CR) and side effects of immunosuppression. Although spontaneous ‘‘operational tolerance’’ can occur in human kidney transplantation, the lack of noninvasive peripheral blood biological markers of this rare phenomenon precludes the identification of potentially tolerant patients in whom immunosuppression could be tapered as well as the development of new tolerance inducing strategies. Here, the potential of high throughput microarray technology to decipher complex pathologies allowed us to study the peripheral blood specific gene expression profile and corresponding EASE molecular pathways associated to operational tolerance in a cohort of human kidney graft recipients. In comparison with patients with CR, tolerant patients displayed a set of 343 differentially expressed genes, mainly immune and defense genes, in their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), of which 223 were also different from healthy volunteers. Using the expression pattern of these 343 genes, we were able to classify correctly >80% of the patients in a cross-validation experiment and classified correctly all of the samples over time. Collectively, this study identifies a unique PBMC gene signature associated with human operational tolerance in kidney transplantation. 250 samples were analyzed, replicates included: some patients from the TOL and CR groups were sampled twice with an interval between the two different time points of at least 16 months (mean 25.8 months, range 16–31 months). All the samples were analyzed in duplicate or quadruplicate. 1. TOL (n = 21). patients with stable graft function (blood creatinemia<150 mmol/L, proteinuria<1 g/24 h) for at least 1 year (mean 6.4 years,range 1.6–17.2 years) after complete interruption of immunosuppressive therapy. 2. STA (n = 190). Patients with stable kidney graft function under immunosuppressive therapy. 3. CR (n = 31). Patients having a progressive degradation of their renal function (blood creatinemia ≥150 mmol/L, proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h). CR was diagnosed on a graft biopsy according to the updated Banff criteria. CR was defined by histological signs of chronic allograft arteriopathy (arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell infiltration) and/or transplant glomerulopathy with glomerular double contours. 4. HV (n = 8). Subjects having normal blood formulae and no infectious or other concomitant pathology for at least 6 months before the study.

Project description:Operational tolerance after solid organ transplantation is defined as stable graft acceptance without immunosuppression while maintaining normal immunocompetence against immunological insults. However, it is not clear yet which cellular and molecular pathways are driving tolerance in these patients and how this state can be induced in order to improve graft survival. Several transcriptomic analysis have shown that transcription signatures in blood can reflect the immunological state associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplant. Nonetheless, epigenetic dynamics orchestrating these transcription signatures have not yet been studied. Here, we performed genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation of kidney transplant recipients with chronic rejection and operational tolerance. Our data showed that chronic rejection and operational tolerance recipients have differential DNA methylation in 2737 genes, indicating that each patient group has a specific epigenetic signature associated with transplant outcome. In addition, we observed that operational tolerance is associated with DNA demethylation in genes involved in immune function, including B cell activation (e.g. ST6GAL1, MS4A1 and MEF2C) and the Th17 differentiation program (e.g. LY9 and BATF), while in CR patients is mostly associated intracellular signaling and ubiquitination pathways. Finally, we used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to select the more defining epigenetic changes associated with operational tolerance. By this method, we select 12 genomic regions specifically hypomethylated (HIVEP2, HOMER1, UTRN, PTPRO, SP100 and JAZF1) or hypermethylated (EMZ8, EZR-AS, WDR20, NADSYN1, TBCD and MED17) in tolerant patients. Analysis of these genes in stable transplant recipients with immunosuppression showed that these patients have a similar methylation signature to operational tolerance recipients. Overall, these results demonstrate that DNA methylation in blood can mirror the immune status associated with kidney transplant outcome and provides a starting point for understanding the epigenetic mechanisms associated with operational tolerance.

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of minimisation of immunosuppression including early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients treated with Basiliximab induction remains unclear.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study reports the outcomes from 298 consecutive renal transplants performed since 1st July 2010-June 2013 treated with Basiliximab induction and early steroid withdrawal in low immunological risk patients using a simple immunological risk stratification and 3-month protocol biopsy to optimise therapy. The cohort comprised 225 low-risk patients (first transplant or HLA antibody calculated reaction frequency (CRF ≤50% with no donor specific HLA antibodies) who underwent basiliximab induction, steroid withdrawal on day 7 and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 73 high-risk patients who received tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone for the first 3 months followed by long term maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and prednisolone. High-risk patients not undergoing 3-month protocol biopsy were continued on triple immunosuppression.ResultsSteroid withdrawal could be safely achieved in low immunological risk recipients with IL2 receptor antibody induction. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 15.1% in the low-risk and 13.9% in the high-risk group (including sub-clinical rejection detected at protocol biopsy). One- year graft survival was 93.3% and patient survival 98.5% in the low-risk group, and 97.3 and 100% respectively in the high-risk group. Graft function was similar in each group at 1 year (mean eGFR 61.2 ± 23.4 mL/min low-risk and 64.6 ± 19.2 mL/min high-risk).ConclusionsImmunosuppression regimen comprising basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone with early steroid withdrawal in low risk patients and MMF withdrawal in high risk patients following a normal 3-month protocol biopsy is effective in limiting acute rejection episodes and produces excellent rates of patient survival, graft function and complications.

Project description:Immunosuppression is needed in HLA identical sibling renal transplantation. We conducted a tolerance trial in this patient cohort using Alemtuzumab induction, donor hematopoietic stem cells, tacrolimus/mycophenolate immunosuppression converted to sirolimus, planning complete drug withdrawal by 24 months post-transplantation. After an additional 12 months with no immunosuppression, normal biopsies and renal function, recipients were considered tolerant. Twenty recipients were enrolled. Of the first 10 (>36 months post-transplantation), 5 had immunosuppression successfully withdrawn for 16-36 months (tolerant), 2 had disease recurrence and 3 had subclinical rejection in protocol biopsies (non-tolerant). Microchimerism disappeared after 1 year, and CD4+CD25highCD127-FOXP3+ T cells and CD19+IgD/M+CD27- B cells increased to 5 years post-transplantation in both groups, whereas immune/inflammatory gene expression pathways in the peripheral blood and urine were differentially downregulated in tolerant compared to non-tolerant recipients. Therefore, in this HLA identical renal transplant tolerance trial, absent chimerism, Treg and Breg immunophenotypes were indistinguishable between tolerant and non-tolerant recipients, but global genomic changes indicating immunomodulation were observed only in tolerant recipients. A total of 46 PBMC samples representing blood draws from four time points in the first 9 recipients were processed for microarray analysis (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). The analyzed time points were: immediately pre-operatively in the absence of immunosuppression (n=9); post-operatively at 1 year (n=8, range 11-13 months); at 2 years (n=12, range 18-25 months); >3 years (n=17, range 32-48 months). (At year 2 and at > 3 years, repeated samples were obtained from individual subjects, and at one year, one subject had a technically unsatisfactory sample.) To discount the effects of immunosuppression on gene expression, microarray data were included on whole blood from 18 healthy human subjects (controls: GSE40586; NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO] repository).

Dataset Information

Application of Operational Tolerance Signatures Are Limited by Variability and Type of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Application of Operational Tolerance Signatures Are Limited by Variability and Type of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets