Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Head-to-head comparison of image quality between brain 18F-FDG images recorded with a fully digital versus a last-generation analog PET camera.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The quality of phantom images was previously shown to be higher on digital (Vereos Philips®) compared to analog PET (Ingenuity Philips®) cameras. This study aimed to determine the extent to which this difference still remains significant on normal brain 18F-FDG PET images.

Methods

Relative noise and contrast as well as border sharpness (a spatial resolution index) of central (striata) and peripheral (occiput) gray-matter structures were compared between 10 sets of normal brain 18F-FDG PET images recorded and reconstructed on digital and analog last-generation PET cameras, together with a subjective visual analysis of image quality provided by experienced physicians.

Results

Compared with analog PET, digital PET provided marked improvements in image quality parameters. The median relative noise was decreased (- 22%), while gray/white-matter contrast was increased (+ 27%/+ 41% for central/peripheral gray-matter structures), with these results being consistent with visual analysis. In addition, a clear enhancement in image sharpness was further documented for digital PET owing to the possible use of a 1-mm3 voxel size (+ 24%/+ 21%).

Conclusions

On normal brain 18F-FDG images and compared with a last-generation analog PET, the fully digital PET camera offers marked improvements in image noise and contrast, as well as significant potential for further enhancing spatial resolution.

SUBMITTER: Salvadori J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6626093 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Head-to-head comparison of image quality between brain <sup>18</sup>F-FDG images recorded with a fully digital versus a last-generation analog PET camera.

Salvadori Julien J   Imbert Laetitia L   Perrin Mathieu M   Karcher Gilles G   Lamiral Zohra Z   Marie Pierre-Yves PY   Verger Antoine A  

EJNMMI research 20190712 1


<h4>Background</h4>The quality of phantom images was previously shown to be higher on digital (Vereos Philips®) compared to analog PET (Ingenuity Philips®) cameras. This study aimed to determine the extent to which this difference still remains significant on normal brain <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET images.<h4>Methods</h4>Relative noise and contrast as well as border sharpness (a spatial resolution index) of central (striata) and peripheral (occiput) gray-matter structures were compared between 10 se  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9730926 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8049349 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10715853 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10614420 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8455448 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10407010 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11769939 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11445334 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9296390 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10216510 | biostudies-literature