Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Viral nucleic acid detection by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is the current standard method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, due to low viral load in some COVID-19 patients, false negative results from this method have been repeatedly reported.Method
In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of digital PCR (dPCR) in simulated samples and clinical samples with qPCR assay through a series of vigorous tests.Results
The results showed that dPCR was more sensitive than qPCR especially for samples with low viral load (≤3 copies). In addition, dPCR had similar specificity as qPCR and could effectively distinguish other human coronaviruses and influenza virus from SARS-CoV-2. More importantly, dPCR was more sensitive than qPCR in detecting the virus in the "negative" samples from recurrent COVID-19 patients.Conclusions
In summary, dPCR could serve as a powerful complement to the current qPCR method for SARS-CoV-2 detection, especially for the samples with extremely low viral load, such as recurrent COVID-19 patients.
SUBMITTER: Sun Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8149472 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Sun Yong Y Ding Chengchao C Chen Qingqing Q Xie Jiajia J Yu Junling J Shi Yonglin Y Jiang Chengcheng C Zhang Zhuhui Z He Hongliang H Ge Yinglu Y Li Wenting W He Jun J Gao Yong Y
Journal of virological methods 20210526
<h4>Objective</h4>Viral nucleic acid detection by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is the current standard method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, due to low viral load in some COVID-19 patients, false negative results from this method have been repeatedly reported.<h4>Method</h4>In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of digital PCR (dPCR) in simulated samples and clinical samples with qPCR assay through a series of vigorous test ...[more]