Dataset Information

Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Heart failure (HF) is common in both men and women, yet disease pathophysiology, presentation, and progression differ between sexes. Studies addressing whether biomarkers predict new onset HF sex-specifically are scarce. This study therefore aims to test the sex-specificity of 252 protein biomarkers for new-onset HF.

Methods and results

A matched case-control design in patients selected from cohorts within the HOMAGE consortium was used. Cases (new-onset HF, n = 562) and controls (n = 780) were matched for cohort (PREDICTOR, HEALTH-ABC, & PROSPER), follow-up time (defined as time from entry to incident HF), and age. Incident HF was defined as first hospitalization for HF. Targeted plasma proteins (n = 252) were measured using Proximity Extension Assay technology from O-link. To look for sex differences for new onset HF, we adjusted for cohort, age, and baseline clinical parameters. At baseline, women had a biomarker profile reflecting activated metabolism and immune responses. However, none of the biomarkers had a significant interaction with sex in predicting new onset HF, but four biomarkers had a trend towards sex-specificity (P < 0.013). E-selectin and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist were more female-specific, whereas IL17A and CHIT1 tended to be male sex-specific for incident HF.

Conclusions

The majority of biomarkers associated with incident HF did not significantly differ between women and men, despite clear differences in biomarkers at baseline.

SUBMITTER: Raafs A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8497379 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.

Raafs Anne A Verdonschot Job J Ferreira João Pedro JP Wang Ping P Collier Timothy T Henkens Michiel M Björkman Jens J Boccanelli Alessandro A Clark Andrew L AL Delles Christian C Diez Javier J González Arantxa A Girerd Nicolas N Jukema J Wouter JW Pinet Florence F Rossignol Patrick P Thum Thomas T Vodovar Nicolas N de Boer Rudolf A RA van Empel Vanessa V Staessen Jan A JA Hazebroek Mark M Cleland John J Zannad Faiez F Heymans Stephane S

ESC heart failure 20210622 5

<h4>Aims</h4>Heart failure (HF) is common in both men and women, yet disease pathophysiology, presentation, and progression differ between sexes. Studies addressing whether biomarkers predict new onset HF sex-specifically are scarce. This study therefore aims to test the sex-specificity of 252 protein biomarkers for new-onset HF.<h4>Methods and results</h4>A matched case-control design in patients selected from cohorts within the HOMAGE consortium was used. Cases (new-onset HF, n = 562) and cont ...[more]

PMID: 34156155

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimWe present the baseline characteristics of the PREFERS Stockholm epidemiological study on the natural history and course of new onset heart failure (HF) aiming to improve phenotyping focusing on HF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) pathophysiology.Methods and resultsNew onset HF patients diagnosed in hospital or at outpatient HF clinics were included at five Stockholm hospitals 2015-2018 and characterized by N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), biomarkers, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (subset). HFpEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%] was compared with HF with mildly reduced LVEF (HFmrEF; LVEF 41-49%) and with HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF; LVEF ≤ 40%). We included 547 patients whereof HFpEF (n = 137; 25%), HFmrEF (n = 61; 11%), and HFrEF (n = 349; 64%). HFpEF patients were older (76; 70-81 years; median; interquartile range) than HFrEF (67; 58-74; P < 0.001), more often women (49% vs. 30%; P < 0.001), and had significantly higher comorbidity burden. They more often had atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and renal dysfunction. NT-proBNP was lower in HFpEF (896; 462-1645 ng/L) than in HFrEF (1160; 563-2370; P = 0.005). In HFpEF, left ventricular (LV) diameters and volumes were smaller (P < 0.001) and septal and posterior wall thickness and relative wall thickness higher (P < 0.001). E/é ≥ 14 was present in 26% of HFpEF vs. 32% of HFrEF (P = 0.017) and left atrial volume index > 34 mL/m2 in 57% vs. 61% (P = 0.040). HFmrEF patients were intermediary between HFpEF and HFrEF for LV mass, LV volumes, and RV volumes but had the highest proportion of left ventricular hypertrophy and the lowest proportion of elevated E/é.ConclusionsPhenotype data in new onset HF patients recruited in a broad clinical setting showed that 25% had HFpEF, were older, more often women, and had greater comorbidity burden. PREFERS is well suited to further explore biomarker and imaging components of HFpEF pathophysiology and may contribute to the emerging knowledge of HF epidemiology.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03671122.

Project description:AimsIron deficiency (ID) is prevalent in chronic heart failure (HF) but lacks a consensus definition. This study evaluates the prevalence and the prognostic impact of ID using different criteria on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as first hospitalization for HF in patients with new-onset chronic HF.MethodsIn this nationwide registry-based cohort, we explored four definitions of ID: the current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines [ferritin <100 ng/mL or ferritin 100-299 ng/mL and transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%], ferritin level <100 ng/mL, TSAT < 20% and serum iron ≤13 μmol/L. Patients were identified through the Danish Heart Failure Registry.ResultsOf 9477 new-onset chronic HF patients registered in the Danish Heart Failure Registry from April 2003 to December 2019, we observed ID prevalence rates ranging from 35.8% to 64.3% depending on the ID definition used. Among patients with ID defined by iron ≤13 μmol/L or TSAT < 20%, 26% and 15.5%, respectively, did not meet the ESC guidelines definition for ID. Conversely, 11% of patients meeting the ESC criteria exhibited serum iron >13 μmol/L and TSAT > 20%. Regardless of anaemia status, ID defined by TSAT < 20% or serum iron ≤13 μmol/L was associated with all-cause mortality [non-anaemic, hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.89 and HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24-1.73; anaemic, HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.38 and HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.44, respectively] and cardiovascular mortality (non-anaemic, HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.59-3.06 and HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.95; anaemic, HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.11-1.69 and HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02-1.61, respectively), as well as increased risk of first hospitalization for HF (non-anaemic, HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.1.50 and HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.46; anaemic, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.44 and HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.42, respectively). ID defined by ESC guidelines was associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality only in non-anaemic patients (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.1.70 and HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.18-2.12.). Furthermore, the ESC guideline definition was associated with increased risk of first hospitalization for HF, regardless of anaemia status (non-anaemic, HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.1.47; anaemic, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.17-1.53).ConclusionsID, when defined by TSAT < 20% or serum iron ≤13 μmol/L, is associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as first hospitalization for HF in patients with new-onset chronic HF, regardless of anaemia status. Conversely, ID defined as ESC guidelines is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality only in non-anaemic patients.

Dataset Information

Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.

Aims

Methods and results

Conclusions

Publications

Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets