Dataset Information

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D₃.

ABSTRACT: The plasma pool of the hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)₂D) is increased throughout most of human pregnancy. Mechanisms behind this adaptation are unclear, in part due to limited data on vitamin D kinetics during pregnancy. Stable isotopes make it possible to study vitamin D kinetics in vulnerable study populations like pregnant women. We conducted a pilot study of vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women. We evaluated a clinical protocol and developed analytical methods to assess the serum appearance and disappearance of trideuterated vitamin D₃ (d3-vitamin D₃) and trideuterated 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (d3-25(OH)D₃) after a single oral dose of 25 μg of [6,19,19-²H]-vitamin D₃ (d3-vitamin D₃). Blood was collected at baseline and 2, 4, 6, 24, 168, 264, and 456 hours post-dosing. We then described the serum kinetic profiles of d3-vitamin D₃ and d3-25(OH)D₃ in nonpregnant and pregnant women. Serum kinetic profiles of d3-vitamin D₃ and d3-25(OH)D₃ followed a time course in line with previous pharmacokinetic studies. There was marked variability between participants in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of d3-25(OH)D₃ over the 20-day study period. This AUC of d3-25(OH)D₃ was positively correlated with the serum vitamin D binding protein (DBP) concentration, which was higher in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women. The mean serum half-life of 25(OH)D₃ was longer but not significantly different in pregnant women (18.8 days) compared with nonpregnant women (13.6 days). Our pilot study demonstrated that a single oral dose of 25 μg of d3-vitamin D₃ can be used to study vitamin D kinetics. Serum DBP concentration is an important predictor of vitamin D kinetics, and more research is needed to fully understand the significance of elevated DBP concentration during pregnancy.

SUBMITTER: Best CM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8749867 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D<sub>3</sub>.

Best Cora M CM Sherwood Robert R Novotny Janet A JA Zhang Sheng S Pressman Eva K EK O'Brien Kimberly O KO

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 20211126

The plasma pool of the hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D) is increased throughout most of human pregnancy. Mechanisms behind this adaptation are unclear, in part due to limited data on vitamin D kinetics during pregnancy. Stable isotopes make it possible to study vitamin D kinetics in vulnerable study populations like pregnant women. We conducted a pilot study of vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women. We evaluated a clinical protocol and developed analytical m ...[more]

PMID: 34843870

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough emerging data during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have demonstrated robust messenger RNA vaccine-induced immunogenicity across populations, including pregnant and lactating individuals, the rapid waning of vaccine-induced immunity and the emergence of variants of concern motivated the use of messenger RNA vaccine booster doses. Whether all populations, including pregnant and lactating individuals, will mount a comparable response to a booster dose is not known.ObjectiveThis study aimed to profile the humoral immune response to a COVID-19 messenger RNA booster dose in a cohort of pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant age-matched women.Study designThis study characterized the antibody response against ancestral Spike and Omicron in a cohort of 31 pregnant, 12 lactating, and 20 nonpregnant age-matched controls who received a BNT162b2 or messenger RNA-1273 booster dose after primary COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, this study examined the vaccine-induced antibody profiles of 15 maternal-to-cord dyads at delivery.ResultsReceiving a booster dose during pregnancy resulted in increased immunoglobulin G1 levels against Omicron Spike (postprimary vaccination vs postbooster dose; P=.03). Pregnant and lactating individuals exhibited equivalent Spike-specific total immunoglobulin G1, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin A levels and neutralizing titers against Omicron compared with nonpregnant women. Subtle differences in Fc receptor binding and antibody subclass profiles were observed in the immune response to a booster dose in pregnant vs nonpregnant individuals. The analysis of maternal and cord antibody profiles at delivery demonstrated equivalent total Spike-specific immunoglobulin G1 in maternal and cord blood, yet higher Spike-specific FcγR3a-binding antibodies in the cord relative to maternal blood (P=.002), consistent with the preferential transfer of highly functional immunoglobulin. Spike-specific immunoglobulin G1 levels in the cord were positively correlated with the time elapsed since receiving the booster dose (Spearman R, .574; P=.035).ConclusionStudy data suggested that receiving a booster dose during pregnancy induces a robust Spike-specific humoral immune response, including against Omicron. If boosting occurs in the third trimester of pregnancy, higher Spike-specific cord immunoglobulin G1 levels are achieved with greater time elapsed between receiving the booster and delivery. Receiving a booster dose has the potential to augment maternal and neonatal immunity.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough mass vaccination against COVID-19 may prove to be the most efficacious end to this deadly pandemic, there remain concern and indecision among the public toward vaccination. Because pregnant and reproductive-aged women account for a large proportion of the population with particular concerns regarding vaccination against COVID-19, this survey aimed at investigating their current attitudes and beliefs within our own institution.ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand vaccine acceptability among pregnant, nonpregnant, and breastfeeding respondents and elucidate factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.Study designWe administered an anonymous online survey to all women (including patients, providers, and staff) at our institution assessing rates of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. Respondents were contacted in 1 of 3 ways: by email, advertisement flyers, and distribution of quick response codes at virtual town halls regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Based on their responses, respondents were divided into 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) nonpregnant respondents, (2) pregnant respondents, and (3) breastfeeding respondents. The primary outcome was acceptance of vaccination. Prevalence ratios were calculated to ascertain the independent effects of multiple patient-level factors on vaccine acceptability.ResultsThe survey was administered from January 7, 2021, to January 29, 2021, with 1012 respondents of whom 466 (46.9%) identified as non-Hispanic White, 108 (10.9%) as non-Hispanic Black, 286 (28.8%) as Hispanic, and 82 (8.2%) as non-Hispanic Asian. The median age was 36 years (interquartile range, 25-47 years). Of all the respondents, 656 respondents (64.8%) were nonpregnant, 216 (21.3%) were pregnant, and 122 (12.1%) were breastfeeding. There was no difference in chronic comorbidities when evaluated as a composite variable (Table 1). A total of 390 respondents (39.2%) reported working in healthcare. Nonpregnant respondents were most likely to accept vaccination (457 respondents, 76.2%; P<.001) with breastfeeding respondents the second most likely (55.2%). Pregnant respondents had the lowest rate of vaccine acceptance (44.3%; P<.001). Prevalence ratios revealed all non-White races except for non-Hispanic Asian respondents, and Spanish-speaking respondents were less likely to accept vaccination (Table 3). Working in healthcare was not found to be associated with vaccine acceptance among our cohort.ConclusionIn this survey study of only women at a single institution, pregnant respondents of non-White or non-Asian races were more likely to decline vaccination than nonpregnant and breastfeeding respondents. Working in healthcare was not associated with vaccine acceptance.

Project description:BackgroundImmune changes that occur during pregnancy may place pregnant women at an increased risk for severe disease following viral infections like SARS-CoV-2. Whether these immunologic changes modify the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is not well understood.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant and nonpregnant women. The immune response following vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 was also explored.Study designIn this cohort study, 24 serum samples from 20 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy were matched by number of days after a positive test with 46 samples from 40 nonpregnant women of reproductive age. Samples from 9 patients who were vaccinated during pregnancy were also examined. Immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M levels were measured. Trends in the log antibody levels over time and mean antibody levels were assessed using generalized estimating equations.ResultsThe median number of days from first positive test to sampling was 6.5 in the pregnant group (range, 3-97) and 6.0 among nonpregnant participants (range, 2-97). No significant differences in demographic or sampling characteristics were noted between the groups. No differences in immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M levels over time or mean antibody levels were noted among pregnant and nonpregnant participants following SARS-CoV-2 infection for any of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen targets examined (spike, spike receptor-binding domain, spike N-terminal domain, and nucleocapsid). Participants who were vaccinated during pregnancy had higher immunoglobulin G levels than pregnant patients who tested positive for all SARS-CoV-2 targets except nucleocapsid antibodies (all P<.001) and had lower immunoglobulin M spike (P<.05) and receptor-binding domain (P<.01) antibody levels.ConclusionThis study suggests that the humoral response following SARS-CoV-2 infection does not seem to differ between pregnant women and their nonpregnant counterparts. These findings should reassure patients and healthcare providers that pregnant patients seem to mount a nondifferential immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Dataset Information

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D₃.

Publications

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D<sub>3</sub>.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D3.

Publications

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D<sub>3</sub>.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Vitamin D kinetics in nonpregnant and pregnant women after a single oral dose of trideuterated vitamin D₃.